Disability and pain after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: A group-based trajectory analysis

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1177/14574969241241969
Sara S. Widbom-Kolhanen, Katri I. Pernaa, Roosa E. Lintuaho, Anna Kotkansalo, Mikhail Saltychev
{"title":"Disability and pain after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: A group-based trajectory analysis","authors":"Sara S. Widbom-Kolhanen, Katri I. Pernaa, Roosa E. Lintuaho, Anna Kotkansalo, Mikhail Saltychev","doi":"10.1177/14574969241241969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives:This study aimed to identify the clusters of patients with different developmental trajectories of pain and disability after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF).Methods:Group-based trajectory analysis among 318 patients undergoing the ACDF.Results:Three developmental trajectories of disability were identified: “Steadily good functioning,” “Improved functioning,” and “Steadily poor functioning.” Three developmental trajectories of neck pain were identified: “Worsened pain,” “Pain relief,” and “Steadily severe pain.” Two developmental trajectories of arm pain were identified: “Decreased arm pain” and “Severe arm pain with only short-term relief.” No associations were found between sex, preoperative pain duration, or body weight and probability to be classified into a particular disability trajectory group. Female sex (relative risk ratio (RRR) 1.78) and longer history of preoperative pain (RRR 2.31–2.68) increased the probability to be classified into a group with steadily severe neck pain. Longer history of preoperative pain increased the probability to be classified into group with severe arm pain with only short-term pain relief (RRR 2.68).Conclusion:After the ACDF, dissimilar developmental trajectories of pain and disability were identified between the patient clusters. While sex, preoperative pain duration, and body weight were not associated with differences in improvement in disability level, female sex and longer duration of preoperative pain were correlated with more severe neck and arm pain after surgery.","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241241969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives:This study aimed to identify the clusters of patients with different developmental trajectories of pain and disability after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF).Methods:Group-based trajectory analysis among 318 patients undergoing the ACDF.Results:Three developmental trajectories of disability were identified: “Steadily good functioning,” “Improved functioning,” and “Steadily poor functioning.” Three developmental trajectories of neck pain were identified: “Worsened pain,” “Pain relief,” and “Steadily severe pain.” Two developmental trajectories of arm pain were identified: “Decreased arm pain” and “Severe arm pain with only short-term relief.” No associations were found between sex, preoperative pain duration, or body weight and probability to be classified into a particular disability trajectory group. Female sex (relative risk ratio (RRR) 1.78) and longer history of preoperative pain (RRR 2.31–2.68) increased the probability to be classified into a group with steadily severe neck pain. Longer history of preoperative pain increased the probability to be classified into group with severe arm pain with only short-term pain relief (RRR 2.68).Conclusion:After the ACDF, dissimilar developmental trajectories of pain and disability were identified between the patient clusters. While sex, preoperative pain duration, and body weight were not associated with differences in improvement in disability level, female sex and longer duration of preoperative pain were correlated with more severe neck and arm pain after surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎前路减压融合术后的残疾和疼痛:基于群体的轨迹分析
目的:本研究旨在确定颈椎前路减压与融合术(ACDF)后出现不同疼痛和残疾发展轨迹的患者群。方法:对318名接受ACDF的患者进行基于组别的轨迹分析:结果:确定了三种残疾发展轨迹:"功能稳定良好"、"功能改善 "和 "功能稳定不良"。颈部疼痛有三种发展轨迹:"疼痛加剧"、"疼痛缓解 "和 "疼痛严重"。手臂疼痛有两种发展轨迹:"手臂疼痛减轻 "和 "手臂疼痛严重,但仅得到短期缓解"。在性别、术前疼痛持续时间或体重与被归入特定残疾轨迹组的概率之间没有发现任何关联。女性(相对风险比为 1.78)和较长的术前疼痛史(相对风险比为 2.31-2.68)增加了被归入持续严重颈部疼痛组的概率。结论:ACDF术后,各组患者的疼痛和残疾发展轨迹不同。虽然性别、术前疼痛持续时间和体重与残疾程度改善的差异无关,但女性性别和术前疼痛持续时间较长与术后颈部和手臂疼痛更严重相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
期刊最新文献
A randomized double-blind noninferiority clinical multicenter trial on oral moxifloxacin versus placebo in the outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: APPAC IV study protocol. Modern surgical treatments for lymphedema. Impact of oral administration of calcitriol to prevent symptomatic hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. 16-year outcomes of blunt thoracic aortic injury treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A single-institution experience. Reducing the risk of cancer with bariatric surgery: The need for evidence to guide practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1