The development of tissue handling skills is sufficient and comparable after training in virtual reality or on a surgical robotic system: a prospective randomized trial

Felix von Bechtolsheim, Andreas Franz, Sofia Schmidt, Alfred Schneider, Felicitas La Rosée, Olga Radulova-Mauersberger, Grit Krause-Jüttler, Anja Hümpel, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Stefanie Speidel, Jürgen Weitz, Marius Distler, Florian Oehme
{"title":"The development of tissue handling skills is sufficient and comparable after training in virtual reality or on a surgical robotic system: a prospective randomized trial","authors":"Felix von Bechtolsheim, Andreas Franz, Sofia Schmidt, Alfred Schneider, Felicitas La Rosée, Olga Radulova-Mauersberger, Grit Krause-Jüttler, Anja Hümpel, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Stefanie Speidel, Jürgen Weitz, Marius Distler, Florian Oehme","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10842-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Virtual reality is a frequently chosen method for learning the basics of robotic surgery. However, it is unclear whether tissue handling is adequately trained in VR training compared to training on a real robotic system.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this randomized controlled trial, participants were split into two groups for “Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS)” training on either a DaVinci VR simulator (VR group) or a DaVinci robotic system (Robot group). All participants completed four tasks on the DaVinci robotic system before training (Baseline test), after proficiency in three FRS tasks (Midterm test), and after proficiency in all FRS tasks (Final test). Primary endpoints were forces applied across tests.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>This trial included 87 robotic novices, of which 43 and 44 participants received FRS training in VR group and Robot group, respectively. The Baseline test showed no significant differences in force application between the groups indicating a sufficient randomization. In the Midterm and Final test, the force application was not different between groups. Both groups displayed sufficient learning curves with significant improvement of force application. However, the Robot group needed significantly less repetitions in the three FRS tasks Ring tower (Robot: 2.48 vs. VR: 5.45; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), Knot Tying (Robot: 5.34 vs. VR: 8.13; <i>p</i> = 0.006), and Vessel Energy Dissection (Robot: 2 vs. VR: 2.38; <i>p</i> = 0.001) until reaching proficiency.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Robotic tissue handling skills improve significantly and comparably after both VR training and training on a real robotic system, but training on a VR simulator might be less efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10842-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Virtual reality is a frequently chosen method for learning the basics of robotic surgery. However, it is unclear whether tissue handling is adequately trained in VR training compared to training on a real robotic system.

Methods

In this randomized controlled trial, participants were split into two groups for “Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS)” training on either a DaVinci VR simulator (VR group) or a DaVinci robotic system (Robot group). All participants completed four tasks on the DaVinci robotic system before training (Baseline test), after proficiency in three FRS tasks (Midterm test), and after proficiency in all FRS tasks (Final test). Primary endpoints were forces applied across tests.

Results

This trial included 87 robotic novices, of which 43 and 44 participants received FRS training in VR group and Robot group, respectively. The Baseline test showed no significant differences in force application between the groups indicating a sufficient randomization. In the Midterm and Final test, the force application was not different between groups. Both groups displayed sufficient learning curves with significant improvement of force application. However, the Robot group needed significantly less repetitions in the three FRS tasks Ring tower (Robot: 2.48 vs. VR: 5.45; p < 0.001), Knot Tying (Robot: 5.34 vs. VR: 8.13; p = 0.006), and Vessel Energy Dissection (Robot: 2 vs. VR: 2.38; p = 0.001) until reaching proficiency.

Conclusion

Robotic tissue handling skills improve significantly and comparably after both VR training and training on a real robotic system, but training on a VR simulator might be less efficient.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在虚拟现实或手术机器人系统上接受培训后,组织处理技能的发展是否充分且具有可比性:一项前瞻性随机试验
背景虚拟现实技术是学习机器人手术基础知识的常用方法。方法在这项随机对照试验中,参与者被分成两组,分别在 DaVinci VR 模拟器(VR 组)或 DaVinci 机器人系统(机器人组)上接受 "机器人手术基础(FRS)"培训。所有参与者分别在培训前(基线测试)、熟练掌握三项 FRS 任务后(中期测试)和熟练掌握所有 FRS 任务后(最终测试)在 DaVinci 机器人系统上完成四项任务。该试验包括 87 名机器人新手,其中 43 人和 44 人分别在虚拟现实组和机器人组接受了 FRS 培训。基线测试显示,各组之间的施力没有明显差异,这表明随机化程度足够高。在中期和最终测试中,各组的用力情况也没有差异。两组都显示出充分的学习曲线,在用力方面都有明显改善。不过,机器人组在三项 FRS 任务中的重复次数明显较少:环形塔(机器人:2.48 vs. VR:5.45;p = 0.001)、打结(机器人:5.34 vs. VR:8.13;p = 0.006)和血管能量剖析(机器人:2 vs. VR:2.38;p = 0.001)。38; p = 0.001),直到达到熟练程度。结论机器人组织处理技能在经过 VR 培训和在真实机器人系统上培训后都有显著提高,且效果相当,但在 VR 模拟器上培训的效率可能较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-term gut microbiota’s shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population Retrospective study on endoscopic treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1