Emotional reactivity and its impact on neural circuitry for attention-emotion interaction through regression-based machine learning model

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Cognitive Neurodynamics Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z
Raghavendra Prasad, Shashikanta Tarai, Arindam Bit
{"title":"Emotional reactivity and its impact on neural circuitry for attention-emotion interaction through regression-based machine learning model","authors":"Raghavendra Prasad, Shashikanta Tarai, Arindam Bit","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attentional paradigm can have a significant influence on the processing and experience of positive and negative emotions. Attentional mechanism refers to the tendency to selectively attend to a particular stimulus while ignoring others. In the context of emotions, individuals may exhibit attentional biases towards either positive or negative emotional stimuli. By directing attention towards a specific stimulus, individuals can modulate their emotional responses. When attention is directed towards negative or threatening stimuli, it can intensify negative emotions such as fear, sadness, anger and anxiety. Conversely, directing attention away from negative stimuli can reduce emotional reactivity and promote emotional regulation. Similarly, paying attention to positive stimuli can amplify positive emotions and facilitate positive emotional experiences. Attentional paradigms are also responsible for cognitive appraisal of emotional stimuli. The allocation of attention can shape how emotional stimuli are evaluated and categorized, influencing the subsequent emotional response. Since the relationship between attention and emotions is complex and can vary across individuals and contexts, it is important to understand the underlying cognitive neural dynamics of the same. Custom rank allocation model (CRAM) was used to decode the underlying neural dynamics of cognitive and emotional resource sharing through the non-significant EEG channels. During the main effect of global–local (GL), CRAM ranks and scores indicated that the EEG channels C4, PZ, OZ, and P4 were found to be the most non-significant channels. Similarly, CRAM ranks and scores of the interaction effects between global–local and positive emotion-negative emotion and the interaction effects between global–local and frequent-deviant-equal indicated midline central EEG channels CZ, PZ, FZ and OZ to be the main contributor of the cognitive and emotional resources to others. Understanding the dynamics of attention-emotion conflicts with reference to significant and non-significant channels is important to gain insights into the complex computational interplay between attention and emotion, leading to a deeper understanding of human cognition and emotion regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"251 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attentional paradigm can have a significant influence on the processing and experience of positive and negative emotions. Attentional mechanism refers to the tendency to selectively attend to a particular stimulus while ignoring others. In the context of emotions, individuals may exhibit attentional biases towards either positive or negative emotional stimuli. By directing attention towards a specific stimulus, individuals can modulate their emotional responses. When attention is directed towards negative or threatening stimuli, it can intensify negative emotions such as fear, sadness, anger and anxiety. Conversely, directing attention away from negative stimuli can reduce emotional reactivity and promote emotional regulation. Similarly, paying attention to positive stimuli can amplify positive emotions and facilitate positive emotional experiences. Attentional paradigms are also responsible for cognitive appraisal of emotional stimuli. The allocation of attention can shape how emotional stimuli are evaluated and categorized, influencing the subsequent emotional response. Since the relationship between attention and emotions is complex and can vary across individuals and contexts, it is important to understand the underlying cognitive neural dynamics of the same. Custom rank allocation model (CRAM) was used to decode the underlying neural dynamics of cognitive and emotional resource sharing through the non-significant EEG channels. During the main effect of global–local (GL), CRAM ranks and scores indicated that the EEG channels C4, PZ, OZ, and P4 were found to be the most non-significant channels. Similarly, CRAM ranks and scores of the interaction effects between global–local and positive emotion-negative emotion and the interaction effects between global–local and frequent-deviant-equal indicated midline central EEG channels CZ, PZ, FZ and OZ to be the main contributor of the cognitive and emotional resources to others. Understanding the dynamics of attention-emotion conflicts with reference to significant and non-significant channels is important to gain insights into the complex computational interplay between attention and emotion, leading to a deeper understanding of human cognition and emotion regulation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基于回归的机器学习模型研究情绪反应及其对注意力-情绪互动神经回路的影响
注意范式会对积极和消极情绪的处理和体验产生重大影响。注意机制指的是有选择地注意某一特定刺激而忽略其他刺激的倾向。在情绪方面,个体可能会对积极或消极的情绪刺激表现出注意偏差。通过将注意力引向特定的刺激,个体可以调节自己的情绪反应。当注意力指向负面或威胁性刺激时,会加剧恐惧、悲伤、愤怒和焦虑等负面情绪。相反,将注意力从负面刺激上转移开,可以降低情绪反应,促进情绪调节。同样,注意积极的刺激可以放大积极情绪,促进积极的情绪体验。注意范式也负责对情绪刺激进行认知评估。注意力的分配会影响对情绪刺激的评价和分类,从而影响随后的情绪反应。由于注意力与情绪之间的关系很复杂,而且会因个体和情境的不同而有所差异,因此了解其背后的认知神经动态非常重要。研究人员使用自定义等级分配模型(CRAM),通过非显著脑电图通道解码认知和情绪资源共享的潜在神经动态。在全局-局部(GL)主效应期间,CRAM 的等级和得分表明,脑电图通道 C4、PZ、OZ 和 P4 是最不显著的通道。同样,全局-局部与积极情绪-消极情绪之间的交互效应以及全局-局部与频繁-偏差-平等之间的交互效应的 CRAM 等级和得分表明,中线中心脑电图通道 CZ、PZ、FZ 和 OZ 是认知和情绪资源对他人的主要贡献者。参照重要通道和非重要通道了解注意力-情绪冲突的动态,对于深入了解注意力和情绪之间复杂的计算相互作用非常重要,从而加深对人类认知和情绪调节的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Cognitive Neurodynamics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models. The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome. The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged. 1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics. 2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages. 3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
A memristor-based circuit design of avoidance learning with time delay and its application Perceptual information processing in table tennis players: based on top-down hierarchical predictive coding EEG-based deception detection using weighted dual perspective visibility graph analysis The dynamical behavior effects of different numbers of discrete memristive synaptic coupled neurons Advancements in automated diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder through deep learning and resting-state functional mri biomarkers: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1