Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Right Ventricular Dysfunction

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.123.013156
Johanna Vogelhuber, Tetsu Tanaka, Refik Kavsur, Tadahiro Goto, Can Öztürk, Miriam Silaschi, Georg Nickenig, Sebastian Zimmer, Marcel Weber, Atsushi Sugiura
{"title":"Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Right Ventricular Dysfunction","authors":"Johanna Vogelhuber, Tetsu Tanaka, Refik Kavsur, Tadahiro Goto, Can Öztürk, Miriam Silaschi, Georg Nickenig, Sebastian Zimmer, Marcel Weber, Atsushi Sugiura","doi":"10.1161/circinterventions.123.013156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND:We assessed the safety profile of tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction.METHODS:We identified patients undergoing TEER to treat tricuspid regurgitation from June 2015 to October 2021 and assessed tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and RV fractional area change (RVFAC). RV dysfunction was defined as TAPSE &lt;17 mm and RVFAC &lt;35%. The primary end point was 30-day mortality after TEER. We also investigated the change in the RV function in the early phase and clinical outcomes at 2 years.RESULTS:The study participants (n=262) were at high surgical risk (EuroSCORE II, 6.2% [interquartile range, 4.0%–10.3%]). Among them, 44 patients met the criteria of RV dysfunction. Thirty-day mortality was 3.2% in patients with normal RV function and 2.3% in patients with RV dysfunction (<i>P</i>=0.99). Tricuspid regurgitation reduction to ≤2+ was consistently achieved irrespective of RV dysfunction (76.5% versus 70.5%; <i>P</i>=0.44). TAPSE and RVFAC declined after TEER in patients with normal RV function (TAPSE, 19.0±4.7 to 17.9±4.5 mm; <i>P</i>=0.001; RVFAC, 46.2%±8.1% to 40.3%±9.7%; <i>P</i>&lt;0.001). In contrast, those parameters were unchanged or tended to increase in patients with RV dysfunction (TAPSE, 13.2±2.3 to 15.3±4.7 mm; <i>P</i>=0.011; RVFAC, 29.6%±4.1% to 31.6%±8.3%; <i>P</i>=0.14). Two years after TEER, compared with patients with normal RV function, patients with RV dysfunction had significantly higher mortality (27.0% versus 56.3%; <i>P</i>&lt;0.001).CONCLUSIONS:TEER was safe and feasible to treat tricuspid regurgitation in patients with RV dysfunction. The decline in the RV function was observed in patients with normal RV function but not in patients with RV dysfunction.","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.123.013156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND:We assessed the safety profile of tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction.METHODS:We identified patients undergoing TEER to treat tricuspid regurgitation from June 2015 to October 2021 and assessed tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and RV fractional area change (RVFAC). RV dysfunction was defined as TAPSE <17 mm and RVFAC <35%. The primary end point was 30-day mortality after TEER. We also investigated the change in the RV function in the early phase and clinical outcomes at 2 years.RESULTS:The study participants (n=262) were at high surgical risk (EuroSCORE II, 6.2% [interquartile range, 4.0%–10.3%]). Among them, 44 patients met the criteria of RV dysfunction. Thirty-day mortality was 3.2% in patients with normal RV function and 2.3% in patients with RV dysfunction (P=0.99). Tricuspid regurgitation reduction to ≤2+ was consistently achieved irrespective of RV dysfunction (76.5% versus 70.5%; P=0.44). TAPSE and RVFAC declined after TEER in patients with normal RV function (TAPSE, 19.0±4.7 to 17.9±4.5 mm; P=0.001; RVFAC, 46.2%±8.1% to 40.3%±9.7%; P<0.001). In contrast, those parameters were unchanged or tended to increase in patients with RV dysfunction (TAPSE, 13.2±2.3 to 15.3±4.7 mm; P=0.011; RVFAC, 29.6%±4.1% to 31.6%±8.3%; P=0.14). Two years after TEER, compared with patients with normal RV function, patients with RV dysfunction had significantly higher mortality (27.0% versus 56.3%; P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS:TEER was safe and feasible to treat tricuspid regurgitation in patients with RV dysfunction. The decline in the RV function was observed in patients with normal RV function but not in patients with RV dysfunction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右心室功能障碍患者经导管三尖瓣边缘到边缘修复术的疗效
背景:我们评估了右心室(RV)功能障碍患者接受三尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修补术(TEER)的安全性。方法:我们确定了2015年6月至2021年10月期间接受TEER治疗三尖瓣反流的患者,并评估了三尖瓣瓣环平面收缩期偏移(TAPSE)和RV分区面积变化(RVFAC)。RV 功能障碍的定义是 TAPSE <17 mm 和 RVFAC <35% 。主要终点是 TEER 后 30 天的死亡率。我们还调查了早期阶段 RV 功能的变化以及 2 年后的临床结果。结果:研究参与者(n=262)的手术风险较高(EuroSCORE II,6.2% [四分位数范围,4.0%-10.3%])。其中,44 名患者符合 RV 功能障碍的标准。RV 功能正常患者的 30 天死亡率为 3.2%,RV 功能障碍患者的 30 天死亡率为 2.3%(P=0.99)。无论 RV 功能障碍与否,三尖瓣反流均能持续减少至≤2+(76.5% 对 70.5%;P=0.44)。RV 功能正常的患者在 TEER 后 TAPSE 和 RVFAC 下降(TAPSE,19.0±4.7 mm 至 17.9±4.5 mm;P=0.001;RVFAC,46.2%±8.1% 至 40.3%±9.7%;P<0.001)。相比之下,RV 功能障碍患者的这些参数没有变化或呈上升趋势(TAPSE,13.2±2.3 至 15.3±4.7 mm;P=0.011;RVFAC,29.6%±4.1% 至 31.6%±8.3%;P=0.14)。结论:TEER治疗RV功能障碍患者的三尖瓣反流是安全可行的。结论:TEER治疗三尖瓣反流在RV功能障碍患者中安全可行,但在RV功能正常的患者中观察到RV功能下降,而在RV功能障碍患者中未观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Coronary Revascularization Decisions: The Promising Role of Large Language Models as a Decision-Support Tool for Multidisciplinary Heart Team. Impact of a Chronic Total Occlusion on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery: A FAME 3 Substudy. Large Language Models and Revascularization Decisions: The Newest Member of Your Multidisciplinary Heart Team? Relative Benefit of Dual Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Oral Anticoagulation According to Time After ACS and PCI: Insights From the AUGUSTUS Trial. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Annular Reduction by Cinching With TEER in the Commissure (ARCTIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1