Characterizing Multisystem Barriers to Women’s Residential SUD Treatment: A Multisite Qualitative Analysis in Los Angeles

Dean Rivera, Benjamin F. Henwood, Steve Sussman, Suzanne Wenzel, Anindita Dasgupta, Aimee N. C. Campbell, Elwin Wu, Hortensia Amaro
{"title":"Characterizing Multisystem Barriers to Women’s Residential SUD Treatment: A Multisite Qualitative Analysis in Los Angeles","authors":"Dean Rivera, Benjamin F. Henwood, Steve Sussman, Suzanne Wenzel, Anindita Dasgupta, Aimee N. C. Campbell, Elwin Wu, Hortensia Amaro","doi":"10.1007/s11524-024-00857-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs are challenged by the differing values of the problem-solving court (PSC) and child welfare (CW) systems, along with communication barriers between staff. This study aimed to understand, from the viewpoints of SUD treatment providers, how divergent values and communication barriers adversely affect women’s residential SUD treatment. We conducted qualitative semistructured interviews with 18 SUD treatment clinicians and six directors from four women’s residential SUD treatment programs. Using a thematic analysis framework, we identified salient themes across specified codes. Analysis revealed six main themes, suggesting differing values and communication barriers across the SUD, PSC, and CW systems adversely affect the provision of SUD treatment. For differing values, three main themes emerged: (a) unaddressed trauma and fear of mental health treatment seeking; (b) perceptions of mothers with a SUD; and (c) the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) timeline as a barrier to SUD treatment provision. For communication barriers, three themes emerged: (a) inadequate communication and responsiveness with PSC and CW systems adversely affect treatment coordination, induce patient stress, and treatment disengagement; (b) lack of PSC and CW communication regarding child visitation planning adversely affects treatment motivation and retention; and (c) competing ASFA, PSC, and CW priorities and inadequate cross-system communication adversely affect treatment planning. Treatment providers face significant barriers in providing effective treatment to women simultaneously involved in the CW and PSC systems. Aligning values and addressing communication barriers, changes in policy, and enhanced cross-system training are crucial. Additionally, it is essential to reevaluate the ASFA timeline to align with the long-term treatment needs of mothers with a SUD. Further research should explore the viewpoints of patients, CW, and PSC staff to gain deeper insights into these SUD treatment barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":17506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-024-00857-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs are challenged by the differing values of the problem-solving court (PSC) and child welfare (CW) systems, along with communication barriers between staff. This study aimed to understand, from the viewpoints of SUD treatment providers, how divergent values and communication barriers adversely affect women’s residential SUD treatment. We conducted qualitative semistructured interviews with 18 SUD treatment clinicians and six directors from four women’s residential SUD treatment programs. Using a thematic analysis framework, we identified salient themes across specified codes. Analysis revealed six main themes, suggesting differing values and communication barriers across the SUD, PSC, and CW systems adversely affect the provision of SUD treatment. For differing values, three main themes emerged: (a) unaddressed trauma and fear of mental health treatment seeking; (b) perceptions of mothers with a SUD; and (c) the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) timeline as a barrier to SUD treatment provision. For communication barriers, three themes emerged: (a) inadequate communication and responsiveness with PSC and CW systems adversely affect treatment coordination, induce patient stress, and treatment disengagement; (b) lack of PSC and CW communication regarding child visitation planning adversely affects treatment motivation and retention; and (c) competing ASFA, PSC, and CW priorities and inadequate cross-system communication adversely affect treatment planning. Treatment providers face significant barriers in providing effective treatment to women simultaneously involved in the CW and PSC systems. Aligning values and addressing communication barriers, changes in policy, and enhanced cross-system training are crucial. Additionally, it is essential to reevaluate the ASFA timeline to align with the long-term treatment needs of mothers with a SUD. Further research should explore the viewpoints of patients, CW, and PSC staff to gain deeper insights into these SUD treatment barriers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描述妇女接受 SUD 住院治疗的多系统障碍:洛杉矶多地点定性分析
问题解决法庭(PSC)和儿童福利(CW)系统的不同价值观以及工作人员之间的沟通障碍给住院药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗项目带来了挑战。本研究旨在从 SUD 治疗提供者的角度,了解不同的价值观和沟通障碍是如何对妇女的住院 SUD 治疗产生不利影响的。我们对来自四个女性 SUD 住院治疗项目的 18 名 SUD 治疗临床医生和六名主任进行了半结构化定性访谈。利用主题分析框架,我们确定了特定代码中的突出主题。分析发现了六大主题,表明 SUD、PSC 和 CW 系统中不同的价值观和沟通障碍对提供 SUD 治疗产生了不利影响。在不同的价值观方面,出现了三个主题:(a)未解决的创伤和对寻求心理健康治疗的恐 惧;(b)对患有 SUD 的母亲的看法;以及(c)《收养和安全家庭法》(ASFA)的时间线是提供 SUD 治疗的障碍。在沟通障碍方面,出现了三个主题:(a) 与 PSC 和 CW 系统的沟通和响应不足会对治疗协调产生不利影响,诱发患者压力和治疗脱离;(b) PSC 和 CW 在儿童探视规划方面缺乏沟通会对治疗动机和保留产生不利影响;(c) ASFA、PSC 和 CW 的优先事项相互竞争以及跨系统沟通不足会对治疗规划产生不利影响。治疗提供者在为同时涉及儿童福利和儿童看护服务系统的妇女提供有效治疗时面临重大障碍。统一价值观、消除沟通障碍、改变政策和加强跨系统培训至关重要。此外,必须重新评估 ASFA 时间表,使其与患有 SUD 的母亲的长期治疗需求相一致。进一步的研究应探讨患者、儿童福利机构和 PSC 工作人员的观点,以深入了解这些 SUD 治疗障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sleep Health among Community-Recruited Opioid-Using People Who Inject Drugs in Los Angeles, CA and Denver, CO Assessing the Burden of Electrical, Elevator, Heat, Hot Water, and Water Service Interruptions in New York City Public Housing Considering Residents’ Health and Well-Being in the Process of Social Housing Redevelopment: A Rapid Scoping Literature Review Strategies to Reduce Frequent Emergency Department Use among Persons Experiencing Homelessness with Mental Health Conditions: a Scoping Review Neighborhood Safety Concerns and the Onset of Depressive Symptoms Among Women: A Population-based Prospective Cohort Study in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1