Characterizing alcohol cue reactive and non-reactive individuals with alcohol use disorder

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108028
Dylan E. Kirsch , Erica N. Grodin , Lara A. Ray
{"title":"Characterizing alcohol cue reactive and non-reactive individuals with alcohol use disorder","authors":"Dylan E. Kirsch ,&nbsp;Erica N. Grodin ,&nbsp;Lara A. Ray","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Exposure to alcohol-related cues is thought to elicit a conditional response characterized by increased craving in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). In the context of AUD research, it is important to consider that not all individuals with an AUD are alcohol cue reactive. This study systematically examined subjective alcohol cue reactivity and its clinical and drinking correlates in individuals with an AUD enrolled in a human laboratory pharmacotherapy trial.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Individuals with current moderate-to-severe AUD (N = 52) completed a standard alcohol cue exposure paradigm and individual difference assessments as part of a human laboratory pharmacotherapy trial (NCT04249882). We classified participants as cue reactive (CR+) and cue non-reactive (CR-), as indicated by self-reported, subjective alcohol urge, and examined group differences in baseline clinical characteristics and drinking outcomes over the course of the trial.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty participants (38%) were identified as CR+, while 32 participants (62%) were identified as CR-. The CR+ and CR− groups did not differ in baseline drinking and AUD clinical characteristics, but the groups differed in race composition (p = 0.02) and smoking prevalence (p = 0.04) such that the CR+ group had lower prevalence of smokers. The CR+, compared with the CR-, group drank more during the trial titration period (p = 0.03). Both groups reduced drinking across the trial (p’s &lt; 0.001), but the CR+ group exhibited a smaller reduction in drinking, compared with the CR- group (time x group, p = 0.029; CR-, p &lt; 0.0001; CR+: p = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results indicate that cue reactivity is a heterogenous construct. Recognizing this heterogeneity, and the clinical factors associated with it, is critical to advancing this paradigm as an early efficacy marker in AUD research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324000777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Exposure to alcohol-related cues is thought to elicit a conditional response characterized by increased craving in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). In the context of AUD research, it is important to consider that not all individuals with an AUD are alcohol cue reactive. This study systematically examined subjective alcohol cue reactivity and its clinical and drinking correlates in individuals with an AUD enrolled in a human laboratory pharmacotherapy trial.

Methods

Individuals with current moderate-to-severe AUD (N = 52) completed a standard alcohol cue exposure paradigm and individual difference assessments as part of a human laboratory pharmacotherapy trial (NCT04249882). We classified participants as cue reactive (CR+) and cue non-reactive (CR-), as indicated by self-reported, subjective alcohol urge, and examined group differences in baseline clinical characteristics and drinking outcomes over the course of the trial.

Results

Twenty participants (38%) were identified as CR+, while 32 participants (62%) were identified as CR-. The CR+ and CR− groups did not differ in baseline drinking and AUD clinical characteristics, but the groups differed in race composition (p = 0.02) and smoking prevalence (p = 0.04) such that the CR+ group had lower prevalence of smokers. The CR+, compared with the CR-, group drank more during the trial titration period (p = 0.03). Both groups reduced drinking across the trial (p’s < 0.001), but the CR+ group exhibited a smaller reduction in drinking, compared with the CR- group (time x group, p = 0.029; CR-, p < 0.0001; CR+: p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Results indicate that cue reactivity is a heterogenous construct. Recognizing this heterogeneity, and the clinical factors associated with it, is critical to advancing this paradigm as an early efficacy marker in AUD research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精线索反应型和非反应型酒精使用障碍患者的特征
目的暴露于酒精相关线索被认为会引起条件反应,其特点是酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者的渴求增加。在 AUD 研究中,重要的是要考虑到并非所有 AUD 患者都对酒精线索有反应。本研究对参加人类实验室药物疗法试验的 AUD 患者的主观酒精线索反应性及其临床和饮酒相关性进行了系统研究。方法目前患有中度至重度 AUD 的患者(N = 52)完成了标准酒精线索暴露范式和个体差异评估,这是人类实验室药物疗法试验(NCT04249882)的一部分。根据自我报告的主观饮酒冲动,我们将参与者分为线索反应型(CR+)和线索非反应型(CR-),并考察了试验过程中基线临床特征和饮酒结果的组间差异。CR+ 组和 CR- 组在基线饮酒和 AUD 临床特征方面没有差异,但在种族构成(P = 0.02)和吸烟率(P = 0.04)方面存在差异,因此 CR+ 组吸烟率较低。与 CR- 组相比,CR+ 组在试验滴定期间饮酒更多(p = 0.03)。两组在整个试验期间的饮酒量都有所减少(p's < 0.001),但与 CR- 组相比,CR+ 组的饮酒量减少幅度较小(时间 x 组,p = 0.029;CR-,p < 0.0001;CR+:p = 0.01)。认识到这种异质性以及与之相关的临床因素,对于推动这一范例成为 AUD 研究中的早期疗效标志至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
Exposure to Bupropion-SR vs. Placebo is associated with reductions in smoking among persons receiving methadone with no stated interest in smoking cessation The transition from cigarette smoking to the exclusive or partial use of e-cigarettes: A multi-stage mixed methods study among French university students Preventing the transitions in poly-tobacco use among young adults: A latent transition analysis of a smoking reduction intervention trial Cannabis use and associated longitudinal transitions in electronic nicotine delivery systems use among young adults in the United States A novel smoking cessation behavior based on quit attempts may identify new genes associated with long-term abstinence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1