Benchmarking of BMDC assay and related QSAR study for identifying sensitizing chemicals

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105623
Lisa Chedik , Shamkhal Baybekov , Gilles Marcou , Frédéric Cosnier , Mélanie Mourot-Bousquenaud , Sandrine Jacquenet , Alexandre Varnek , Fabrice Battais
{"title":"Benchmarking of BMDC assay and related QSAR study for identifying sensitizing chemicals","authors":"Lisa Chedik ,&nbsp;Shamkhal Baybekov ,&nbsp;Gilles Marcou ,&nbsp;Frédéric Cosnier ,&nbsp;Mélanie Mourot-Bousquenaud ,&nbsp;Sandrine Jacquenet ,&nbsp;Alexandre Varnek ,&nbsp;Fabrice Battais","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Bone-Marrow derived Dendritic Cell (BMDC) test is a promising assay for identifying sensitizing chemicals based on the 3Rs (Replace, Reduce, Refine) principle.</p><p>This study expanded the BMDC benchmarking to various <em>in vitro</em>, <em>in chemico</em>, and <em>in silico</em> assays targeting different key events (KE) in the skin sensitization pathway, using common substances datasets. Additionally, a Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) model was developed to predict the BMDC test outcomes for sensitizing or non-sensitizing chemicals. The modeling workflow involved ISIDA (<em>In Silico</em> Design and Data Analysis) molecular fragment descriptors and the SVM (Support Vector Machine) machine-learning method.</p><p>The BMDC model's performance was at least comparable to that of all ECVAM-validated models regardless of the KE considered. Compared with other tests targeting KE3, related to dendritic cell activation, BMDC assay was shown to have higher balanced accuracy and sensitivity concerning both the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) and human labels, providing additional evidence for its reliability. The consensus QSAR model exhibits promising results, correlating well with observed sensitization potential. Integrated into a publicly available web service, the BMDC-based QSAR model may serve as a cost-effective and rapid alternative to lab experiments, providing preliminary screening for sensitization potential, compound prioritization, optimization and risk assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105623"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bone-Marrow derived Dendritic Cell (BMDC) test is a promising assay for identifying sensitizing chemicals based on the 3Rs (Replace, Reduce, Refine) principle.

This study expanded the BMDC benchmarking to various in vitro, in chemico, and in silico assays targeting different key events (KE) in the skin sensitization pathway, using common substances datasets. Additionally, a Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) model was developed to predict the BMDC test outcomes for sensitizing or non-sensitizing chemicals. The modeling workflow involved ISIDA (In Silico Design and Data Analysis) molecular fragment descriptors and the SVM (Support Vector Machine) machine-learning method.

The BMDC model's performance was at least comparable to that of all ECVAM-validated models regardless of the KE considered. Compared with other tests targeting KE3, related to dendritic cell activation, BMDC assay was shown to have higher balanced accuracy and sensitivity concerning both the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) and human labels, providing additional evidence for its reliability. The consensus QSAR model exhibits promising results, correlating well with observed sensitization potential. Integrated into a publicly available web service, the BMDC-based QSAR model may serve as a cost-effective and rapid alternative to lab experiments, providing preliminary screening for sensitization potential, compound prioritization, optimization and risk assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BMDC 分析法的基准和相关 QSAR 研究,用于确定致敏化学品
骨箭头衍生树突状细胞(BMDC)测试是基于 3R(替换、减少、完善)原则识别致敏化学品的一种很有前景的检测方法。本研究利用常见物质数据集,将 BMDC 基准测试扩展到针对皮肤致敏途径中不同关键事件(KE)的各种体外、化学和硅学检测。此外,还开发了一个定量结构-活性关系(QSAR)模型,用于预测致敏或非致敏化学品的 BMDC 测试结果。建模工作流程包括 ISIDA(In Silico Design and Data Analysis,硅设计和数据分析)分子片段描述符和 SVM(Support Vector Machine,支持向量机)机器学习方法。与其他针对与树突状细胞活化有关的 KE3 的测试相比,BMDC 分析法在局部淋巴结分析法(LLNA)和人体标签方面具有更高的平衡准确性和灵敏度,为其可靠性提供了更多证据。一致同意的 QSAR 模型显示出良好的结果,与观察到的致敏潜力有很好的相关性。基于 BMDC 的 QSAR 模型集成到一个公开可用的网络服务中,可作为实验室实验的一种经济、快速的替代方法,提供敏化潜力的初步筛选、化合物优先排序、优化和风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
期刊最新文献
Considerations and derivations of permitted daily exposure limits for impurities from intravitreal pharmaceutical products. Carcinogenicity Assessment of Inotersen in Tg.rasH2 Mice and Sprague-Dawley Rats: Implications for 2'-MOE Antisense Oligonucleotides. Enhancing reliability of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies: A proposed design of replicate studies. Target organ toxicity in Sprague Dawley rats following oral exposure to complex groundwater mixture: Assessment of dose-response relationships using histopathological and biochemical alterations Minimizing the Risk of Ethylene Glycol and Diethylene Glycol Poisoning in Medications: A Regulatory and Pharmacopoeial Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1