The Power of Proximity: Toward an Ethic of Accompaniment in Surgical Care

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1002/hast.1575
C. Phifer Nicholson Jr., Monica H. Bodd, Ellery Sarosi, Martha C. Carlough, M. Therese Lysaught, Farr A. Curlin
{"title":"The Power of Proximity: Toward an Ethic of Accompaniment in Surgical Care","authors":"C. Phifer Nicholson Jr.,&nbsp;Monica H. Bodd,&nbsp;Ellery Sarosi,&nbsp;Martha C. Carlough,&nbsp;M. Therese Lysaught,&nbsp;Farr A. Curlin","doi":"10.1002/hast.1575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Although the field of surgical ethics focuses primarily on informed consent, surgical decision-making, and research ethics, some surgeons have started to consider ethical questions regarding justice and solidarity with poor and minoritized populations. To date, those calling for social justice in surgical care have emphasized increased diversity within the ranks of the surgical profession. This article, in contrast, foregrounds the agency of those most affected by injustice by bringing to bear an ethic of accompaniment. The ethic of accompaniment is born from a theological tradition that has motivated work to improve health outcomes in those at the margins through its emphasis on listening, solidarity against systemic drivers of disease, and proximity to individuals and communities. Through a review of surgical ethics and exploration of a central patient case, we argue for applying an ethic of accompaniment to the care of surgical patients and their communities</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 2","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the field of surgical ethics focuses primarily on informed consent, surgical decision-making, and research ethics, some surgeons have started to consider ethical questions regarding justice and solidarity with poor and minoritized populations. To date, those calling for social justice in surgical care have emphasized increased diversity within the ranks of the surgical profession. This article, in contrast, foregrounds the agency of those most affected by injustice by bringing to bear an ethic of accompaniment. The ethic of accompaniment is born from a theological tradition that has motivated work to improve health outcomes in those at the margins through its emphasis on listening, solidarity against systemic drivers of disease, and proximity to individuals and communities. Through a review of surgical ethics and exploration of a central patient case, we argue for applying an ethic of accompaniment to the care of surgical patients and their communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲近的力量:实现外科护理中的陪伴伦理
尽管外科伦理学领域主要关注知情同意、手术决策和研究伦理学,但一些外科医生已开始考虑与贫困和少数群体的正义和团结有关的伦理学问题。迄今为止,呼吁在外科护理中实现社会正义的人一直在强调增加外科专业队伍的多样性。与此相反,本文通过提出陪伴伦理,强调受不公正影响最严重者的能动性。陪伴伦理源于神学传统,它强调倾听、团结一致对抗疾病的系统性驱动因素以及贴近个人和社区,从而推动改善边缘人群健康状况的工作。通过对外科伦理学的回顾和对一个核心病例的探讨,我们主张将陪伴伦理应用于外科患者及其社区的护理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
期刊最新文献
Adam Omelianchuk, Alexander Morgan Capron, Lainie Friedman Ross, Arthur R. Derse, James L. Bernat, and David Magnus reply: Gender, Pediatric Care, and Evidence Johan C. Bester replies: Language Matters: The Semantics and Politics of “Assisted Dying” On Normothermic Regional Perfusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1