Settler aesthetics—Theorizing and contesting settler colonialism through art practice

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geography Compass Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1111/gec3.12747
J. Zoe Malot
{"title":"Settler aesthetics—Theorizing and contesting settler colonialism through art practice","authors":"J. Zoe Malot","doi":"10.1111/gec3.12747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growing scholarship on settler colonialism largely understudies aesthetics. Settler colonial logics work not only through the elimination, dispossession, and criminalization of Indigenous populations but also through the erasure of Indigenous narratives and aesthetics. Aesthetics communicate a particular system of knowledge and power that can either refute or perpetuate settler colonial projects. I use the term “settler aesthetics” to foreground an understanding of aesthetics as dynamic socio-spatial practices through which state and non-state actors assert power, construct particular visions of a city, and shape conditions of belonging. Settler aesthetics demonstrate how the logic of elimination and the work of settler memory reproduces and is reproduced through various visual modalities. I argue that as geographers, we must examine both contemporary settler colonial projects that continue codifying cities as purely settler spaces without Indigenous presence and resistance, and spaces that insist on Black, Latinx, and Indigenous presence and livingness. This paper therefore explores how scholarship on decolonizing and anti-colonial art practice and theory can inform emerging scholarship on settler colonial urbanism that centers perspectives and practices of Black and Indigenous presence and resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51411,"journal":{"name":"Geography Compass","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.12747","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography Compass","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12747","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing scholarship on settler colonialism largely understudies aesthetics. Settler colonial logics work not only through the elimination, dispossession, and criminalization of Indigenous populations but also through the erasure of Indigenous narratives and aesthetics. Aesthetics communicate a particular system of knowledge and power that can either refute or perpetuate settler colonial projects. I use the term “settler aesthetics” to foreground an understanding of aesthetics as dynamic socio-spatial practices through which state and non-state actors assert power, construct particular visions of a city, and shape conditions of belonging. Settler aesthetics demonstrate how the logic of elimination and the work of settler memory reproduces and is reproduced through various visual modalities. I argue that as geographers, we must examine both contemporary settler colonial projects that continue codifying cities as purely settler spaces without Indigenous presence and resistance, and spaces that insist on Black, Latinx, and Indigenous presence and livingness. This paper therefore explores how scholarship on decolonizing and anti-colonial art practice and theory can inform emerging scholarship on settler colonial urbanism that centers perspectives and practices of Black and Indigenous presence and resistance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定居者美学--通过艺术实践理论化并质疑定居者殖民主义
关于定居者殖民主义的学术研究日益增多,但在很大程度上对美学研究不足。定居者殖民逻辑不仅通过消灭、剥夺土著居民并将其定罪,还通过抹杀土著叙事和美学来发挥作用。美学传达了一种特殊的知识和权力体系,它既可以反驳定居者殖民项目,也可以使其永久化。我使用 "定居者美学 "一词来强调对美学的理解,即美学是动态的社会空间实践,国家和非国家行为者通过美学来维护权力、构建城市的特殊愿景并塑造归属条件。定居者美学展示了消除的逻辑和定居者记忆的工作是如何通过各种视觉模式复制和被复制的。我认为,作为地理学家,我们必须审视当代殖民定居者项目,这些项目继续将城市编纂为没有土著存在和反抗的纯粹定居者空间,以及坚持黑人、拉美裔和土著存在和生活的空间。因此,本文探讨了有关非殖民化和反殖民艺术实践与理论的学术研究如何为以黑人和原住民存在与反抗的视角和实践为中心的新兴殖民定居城市化学术研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geography Compass
Geography Compass GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Geography Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Geography Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Geography Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
期刊最新文献
Historical Geographies of Engineering: Knowledges, Practices, Identities Big Data (R)evolution in Geography: Complexity Modelling in the Last Two Decades The Legal Geographies of Contracts: A Method on Formation, Substance and Enforcement Disrupting the Chrononormativity of Geographies of Youth and Youth Studies: Learning From Infractions at the Border Defining Climate Finance Justice: Critical Geographies of Justice Amid Financialized Climate Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1