Enhancing outcome prediction by applying the 2019 WHO DM classification to adults with hyperglycemic crises: A single-center cohort in Thailand

IF 4.3 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103012
Chatchon Kaewkrasaesin , Weerapat Kositanurit , Phawinpon Chotwanvirat , Nitchakarn Laichuthai
{"title":"Enhancing outcome prediction by applying the 2019 WHO DM classification to adults with hyperglycemic crises: A single-center cohort in Thailand","authors":"Chatchon Kaewkrasaesin ,&nbsp;Weerapat Kositanurit ,&nbsp;Phawinpon Chotwanvirat ,&nbsp;Nitchakarn Laichuthai","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>Hyperglycemic crisis is a metabolic catastrophe which can occur in any type of diabetes. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) revised the classification of diabetes mellitus (DM) and established two new hybrid forms, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) and ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to determine clinical outcomes after a hyperglycemic crisis event in people with diabetes classified subtypes by 2019 WHO DM classification.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A five-year (2015–2019) retrospective study of adult patients admitted with hyperglycemic crises was conducted. Types of diabetes were recategorized based on the 2019 WHO DM classification. Clinical characteristics, in-admission treatment and complications, long-term follow-up outcomes, and mortality were collected, analyzed, and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 185 admissions occurred in 136 patients. The mean age was 50.6 ± 18.4 years (49.3 % men). The annual average incidence of hyperglycemic crises was 5.2 events/1000 persons. The proportion of type 1 diabetes, T2D, LADA, ketosis-prone T2D, and pancreatic DM were 15.4 %, 69.1 %, 2.2 %, 11 %, and 2.2 %, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 3.7 % while cumulative mortality totaled 19.1 %. During the 24-month follow-up, ketosis-prone T2D had the highest success of insulin discontinuation (HR 6.59; 95 % CI 6.69–319.4; p &lt; 0.001), while T2D demonstrated the highest mortality compared to others (HR, 2.89; 95%CI 1.15–6.27; p = 0.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The reclassification of diabetes based on 2019 WHO DM classification helped elucidate differences in long-term outcomes and mortality among DM types. The new classification, which separates ketosis-prone T2D from standard T2D, should be encouraged in clinical practice for precise and individualized management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"18 4","pages":"Article 103012"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124000730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Hyperglycemic crisis is a metabolic catastrophe which can occur in any type of diabetes. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) revised the classification of diabetes mellitus (DM) and established two new hybrid forms, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) and ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to determine clinical outcomes after a hyperglycemic crisis event in people with diabetes classified subtypes by 2019 WHO DM classification.

Methods

A five-year (2015–2019) retrospective study of adult patients admitted with hyperglycemic crises was conducted. Types of diabetes were recategorized based on the 2019 WHO DM classification. Clinical characteristics, in-admission treatment and complications, long-term follow-up outcomes, and mortality were collected, analyzed, and compared.

Results

A total of 185 admissions occurred in 136 patients. The mean age was 50.6 ± 18.4 years (49.3 % men). The annual average incidence of hyperglycemic crises was 5.2 events/1000 persons. The proportion of type 1 diabetes, T2D, LADA, ketosis-prone T2D, and pancreatic DM were 15.4 %, 69.1 %, 2.2 %, 11 %, and 2.2 %, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 3.7 % while cumulative mortality totaled 19.1 %. During the 24-month follow-up, ketosis-prone T2D had the highest success of insulin discontinuation (HR 6.59; 95 % CI 6.69–319.4; p < 0.001), while T2D demonstrated the highest mortality compared to others (HR, 2.89; 95%CI 1.15–6.27; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

The reclassification of diabetes based on 2019 WHO DM classification helped elucidate differences in long-term outcomes and mortality among DM types. The new classification, which separates ketosis-prone T2D from standard T2D, should be encouraged in clinical practice for precise and individualized management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将 2019 年世界卫生组织 DM 分类应用于成人高血糖危象,加强预后预测:泰国单中心队列
背景和目的高血糖危象是一种代谢灾难,可发生于任何类型的糖尿病。2019年,世界卫生组织(WHO)修订了糖尿病(DM)的分类,并确立了两种新的混合形式,即成人潜伏性自身免疫性糖尿病(LADA)和酮症易发型2型糖尿病(T2D)。本研究旨在确定按2019年WHO DM分类法划分为亚型的糖尿病患者发生高血糖危象事件后的临床结果。方法对因高血糖危象入院的成年患者进行了为期五年(2015-2019年)的回顾性研究。根据 2019 年 WHO DM 分类对糖尿病类型进行了重新分类。收集、分析和比较了临床特征、入院治疗和并发症、长期随访结果和死亡率。平均年龄为 50.6 ± 18.4 岁(49.3% 为男性)。高血糖危象的年平均发生率为 5.2 次/1000 人。1型糖尿病、T2D、LADA、酮症易发T2D和胰腺DM的比例分别为15.4%、69.1%、2.2%、11%和2.2%。院内死亡率为3.7%,累计死亡率为19.1%。在24个月的随访期间,容易发生酮病的T2D患者停用胰岛素的成功率最高(HR 6.59;95%CI 6.69-319.4;p <;0.001),而T2D患者的死亡率与其他患者相比最高(HR,2.89;95%CI 1.15-6.27;p = 0.02)。新分类将易酮症化 T2D 与标准 T2D 区分开来,应在临床实践中加以推广,以便进行精确的个体化管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care. Types of Publications: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.
期刊最新文献
Modifying the timing of breakfast improves postprandial glycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial Rising trends of diabetes in South Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Nanotechnology as a potential treatment for diabetes and its complications: A review Association of dietary manganese intake with new-onset chronic kidney disease in participants with diabetes The effectiveness of delivery modalities of non-pharmacological diabetes prevention programs: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1