Disrupting B and T cell Collaboration in Autoimmune Disease: T cell engagers versus CAR T cell therapy?

Kavina Shah, Maria Leandro, Mark Cragg, Florian Kollert, Franz Schuler, Christian Klein, Venkat Reddy
{"title":"Disrupting B and T cell Collaboration in Autoimmune Disease: T cell engagers versus CAR T cell therapy?","authors":"Kavina Shah, Maria Leandro, Mark Cragg, Florian Kollert, Franz Schuler, Christian Klein, Venkat Reddy","doi":"10.1093/cei/uxae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary B and T cells collaborate to drive autoimmune disease (AID). Historically, B and T cell (B-T cell) co-interaction was targeted through different pathways such as alemtuzumab, abatacept, and dapirolizumab with variable impact on B cell depletion (BCD), whereas the majority of patients with AID including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis and organ transplantation benefit from targeted BCD with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab, ocrelizumab or ofatumumab. Refractory AID is a significant problem for patients with incomplete BCD with a greater frequency of IgD-CD27+ switched memory B cells, CD19+CD20- B cells and plasma cells that are not directly targeted by anti-CD20 antibodies, whereas most lymphoid tissue plasma cells express CD19. Furthermore, B-T cell collaboration is predominant in lymphoid tissues and at sites of inflammation such as the joint and kidney, where BCD may be inefficient, due to limited access to key effector cells. In the treatment of cancer, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and T cell engagers (TCE) that recruit T cells to induce B cell cytotoxicity have delivered promising results for anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapies, the CD19 TCE blinatumomab and CD20 TCE such as mosunetuzumab, glofitamab or epcoritamab. Limited evidence suggests that anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy may be effective in managing refractory AID whereas we await evaluation of TCE for use in non-oncological indications. Therefore, here, we discuss the potential mechanistic advantages of novel therapies that rely on T cells as effector cells to disrupt B-T cell collaboration toward overcoming rituximab-resistant AID.","PeriodicalId":10179,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Immunology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cei/uxae031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary B and T cells collaborate to drive autoimmune disease (AID). Historically, B and T cell (B-T cell) co-interaction was targeted through different pathways such as alemtuzumab, abatacept, and dapirolizumab with variable impact on B cell depletion (BCD), whereas the majority of patients with AID including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis and organ transplantation benefit from targeted BCD with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab, ocrelizumab or ofatumumab. Refractory AID is a significant problem for patients with incomplete BCD with a greater frequency of IgD-CD27+ switched memory B cells, CD19+CD20- B cells and plasma cells that are not directly targeted by anti-CD20 antibodies, whereas most lymphoid tissue plasma cells express CD19. Furthermore, B-T cell collaboration is predominant in lymphoid tissues and at sites of inflammation such as the joint and kidney, where BCD may be inefficient, due to limited access to key effector cells. In the treatment of cancer, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and T cell engagers (TCE) that recruit T cells to induce B cell cytotoxicity have delivered promising results for anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapies, the CD19 TCE blinatumomab and CD20 TCE such as mosunetuzumab, glofitamab or epcoritamab. Limited evidence suggests that anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy may be effective in managing refractory AID whereas we await evaluation of TCE for use in non-oncological indications. Therefore, here, we discuss the potential mechanistic advantages of novel therapies that rely on T cells as effector cells to disrupt B-T cell collaboration toward overcoming rituximab-resistant AID.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破坏自身免疫性疾病中的 B 细胞和 T 细胞协作:T 细胞吸引器与 CAR T 细胞疗法?
摘要 B 细胞和 T 细胞共同作用,导致自身免疫性疾病(AID)。而大多数自身免疫性疾病(包括类风湿性关节炎、系统性红斑狼疮、多发性硬化症和器官移植)患者都受益于使用抗CD20单克隆抗体(如利妥昔单抗、奥克利珠单抗或ofatumumab)进行的靶向BCD(B-T细胞)治疗。难治性 AID 是不完全 BCD 患者面临的一个重要问题,这些患者体内存在更多的 IgD-CD27+ 交换记忆 B 细胞、CD19+CD20- B 细胞以及抗 CD20 抗体不能直接靶向的浆细胞,而大多数淋巴组织浆细胞都表达 CD19。此外,B-T 细胞合作主要存在于淋巴组织以及关节和肾脏等炎症部位,在这些部位,由于接触关键效应细胞的机会有限,BCD 的效果可能不佳。在治疗癌症方面,嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法和T细胞诱导剂(TCE)能招募T细胞诱导B细胞细胞毒性,在抗CD19 CAR T细胞疗法、CD19 TCE blinatumomab和CD20 TCE(如mosunetuzumab、glofitamab或epcoritamab)方面取得了令人鼓舞的成果。有限的证据表明,抗 CD19 CAR T 细胞疗法可有效治疗难治性 AID,而我们正在等待对 TCE 用于非肿瘤适应症的评估。因此,我们在此讨论新型疗法的潜在机制优势,即依靠 T 细胞作为效应细胞来破坏 B-T 细胞协作,从而克服利妥昔单抗耐药的 AID。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Redundant role of PAD2 and PAD4 in the development of cardiovascular lesions in a mouse model of Kawasaki Disease vasculitis CpG Oligodeoxynucleotide-Coated Chitosan Nanoparticles Enhance Macrophage Proinflammatory Phenotype In Vitro Follow-up of Immune Response in Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Immune profiling reveals umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells from South India display an IL-8 dominant, CXCL-10 deficient polyfunctional monocyte response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that is distinct from adult blood cells NKG2C+CD57+ natural killer with senescent features cells are induced in cutaneous leishmaniasis and accumulate in patients with lesional healing impairment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1