Understanding current antenatal Hepatitis C testing and care in maternity services in England

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2023-0508
Amoolya Vusirikala, Georgia Threadgold, Rachel Roche, Matthew Hibbert, Ruth Simmons, Sharon Webb, Mark Gillyon-Powell, Monica Desai, Sema Mandal
{"title":"Understanding current antenatal Hepatitis C testing and care in maternity services in England","authors":"Amoolya Vusirikala, Georgia Threadgold, Rachel Roche, Matthew Hibbert, Ruth Simmons, Sharon Webb, Mark Gillyon-Powell, Monica Desai, Sema Mandal","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2023-0508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Universal opt-out antenatal screening for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not currently recommened and it is recommended that maternity services offer risk-based testing. We aimed to investigate antenatal HCV testing and adherence to testing guidance. Methods A cross-sectional survey was circulated to maternity service providers between November–December 2020 which included testing policy, training for healthcare staff, and management of women found to be HCV positive. Descriptive data are presented. Results 75 questionnaires were returned, representing 48 % of English maternity service providers. 87 % of providers reported offering antenatal HCV risk-based testing. Risk factors used to identify pregnant women for testing varied. Less than 15 % of respondents considered women that were ever homeless or with history of incarceraton or from higher HCV prevalence areas as high risk. Conclusions Current antenatal HCV testing practices are inadequate and HCV infection likely goes undiagnosed in pregnancy, especially among vulnerable population groups. In the absence of universal antenatal screening, re-framing antenatal HCV risk-based testing and management as a quality improvement initiative and developing HCV specific pathway guidance for maternity units is required.","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Universal opt-out antenatal screening for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not currently recommened and it is recommended that maternity services offer risk-based testing. We aimed to investigate antenatal HCV testing and adherence to testing guidance. Methods A cross-sectional survey was circulated to maternity service providers between November–December 2020 which included testing policy, training for healthcare staff, and management of women found to be HCV positive. Descriptive data are presented. Results 75 questionnaires were returned, representing 48 % of English maternity service providers. 87 % of providers reported offering antenatal HCV risk-based testing. Risk factors used to identify pregnant women for testing varied. Less than 15 % of respondents considered women that were ever homeless or with history of incarceraton or from higher HCV prevalence areas as high risk. Conclusions Current antenatal HCV testing practices are inadequate and HCV infection likely goes undiagnosed in pregnancy, especially among vulnerable population groups. In the absence of universal antenatal screening, re-framing antenatal HCV risk-based testing and management as a quality improvement initiative and developing HCV specific pathway guidance for maternity units is required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解英格兰产前丙肝检测和产科服务的现状
目的 目前尚未建议进行普遍的选择性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)产前筛查,建议产科服务机构提供基于风险的检测。我们旨在调查产前丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)检测和检测指南的遵守情况。方法 我们在 2020 年 11 月至 12 月期间向产科服务提供者分发了一份横断面调查表,内容包括检测政策、医护人员培训以及对发现 HCV 阳性产妇的管理。本报告提供了描述性数据。结果 共收回 75 份问卷,占英国产科服务提供者的 48%。87% 的医疗机构表示提供产前基于风险的 HCV 检测。用于确定孕妇接受检测的风险因素各不相同。不到 15% 的受访者认为曾无家可归、有监禁史或来自 HCV 感染率较高地区的妇女属于高危人群。结论 目前的产前 HCV 检测方法不够完善,妊娠期 HCV 感染很可能得不到诊断,尤其是在易感人群中。在没有普及产前筛查的情况下,有必要将基于风险的产前HCV检测和管理作为一项质量改进措施,并为产科制定HCV具体路径指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Placental fetal vascular malperfusion in maternal diabetes mellitus. Effects of a respiratory function indicator light on visual attention and ventilation quality during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised controlled crossover simulation trial. External validation of a non-invasive vaginal tool to assess the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation in pregnant women with preterm labor and intact membranes. The value of ultrasound spectra of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery blood flow in adverse pregnancy outcomes. A family-centric, comprehensive nurse-led home oxygen programme for neonatal chronic lung disease: home oxygen policy evaluation (HOPE) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1