Improving the Detection, Assessment, Management and Prevention of Delirium in Hospices (the DAMPen-D study): Feasibility study of a flexible and scalable implementation strategy to deliver guideline-adherent delirium care

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1177/02692163241236325
Gillian P Jackson, Catriona E Jackson, Jason W Boland, Imogen Featherstone, Chao Huang, Margaret Ogden, Kathryn Sartain, Najma Siddiqi, Maureen Twiddy, Mark Pearson, Miriam J Johnson
{"title":"Improving the Detection, Assessment, Management and Prevention of Delirium in Hospices (the DAMPen-D study): Feasibility study of a flexible and scalable implementation strategy to deliver guideline-adherent delirium care","authors":"Gillian P Jackson, Catriona E Jackson, Jason W Boland, Imogen Featherstone, Chao Huang, Margaret Ogden, Kathryn Sartain, Najma Siddiqi, Maureen Twiddy, Mark Pearson, Miriam J Johnson","doi":"10.1177/02692163241236325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Delirium is a complex condition, stressful for all involved. Although highly prevalent in palliative care settings, it remains underdiagnosed and associated with poor outcomes. Guideline-adherent delirium care may improve its detection, assessment and management.Aim:To inform a future definitive study that tests whether an implementation strategy designed to improve guideline-adherent delirium care in palliative care settings improves patient outcomes (reduced proportion of in-patient days with delirium).Design:With Patient Involvement members, we conducted a feasibility study to assess the acceptability of and engagement with the implementation strategy by hospice staff (intervention), and whether clinical record data collection of process (e.g. guideline-adherent delirium care) and clinical outcomes (evidence of delirium using a validated chart-based instrument;) pre- and 12-weeks post-implementation of the intervention would be possible.Setting/participants:In-patient admissions in three English hospices.Results:Between June 2021 and December 2022, clinical record data were extracted from 300 consecutive admissions. Despite data collection during COVID-19, target clinical record data collection ( n = 300) was achieved. Approximately two-thirds of patients had a delirium episode during in-patient stay at both timepoints. A 6% absolute reduction in proportion of delirium days in those with a delirium episode was observed. Post-implementation improvements in guideline-adherent metrics include: clinical delirium diagnosis 15%–28%; delirium risk assessment 0%–16%; screening on admission 7%–35%.Conclusions:Collection of data on delirium outcomes and guideline-adherence from clinical records is feasible. The signal of patient benefit supports formal evaluation in a large-scale study.","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241236325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Delirium is a complex condition, stressful for all involved. Although highly prevalent in palliative care settings, it remains underdiagnosed and associated with poor outcomes. Guideline-adherent delirium care may improve its detection, assessment and management.Aim:To inform a future definitive study that tests whether an implementation strategy designed to improve guideline-adherent delirium care in palliative care settings improves patient outcomes (reduced proportion of in-patient days with delirium).Design:With Patient Involvement members, we conducted a feasibility study to assess the acceptability of and engagement with the implementation strategy by hospice staff (intervention), and whether clinical record data collection of process (e.g. guideline-adherent delirium care) and clinical outcomes (evidence of delirium using a validated chart-based instrument;) pre- and 12-weeks post-implementation of the intervention would be possible.Setting/participants:In-patient admissions in three English hospices.Results:Between June 2021 and December 2022, clinical record data were extracted from 300 consecutive admissions. Despite data collection during COVID-19, target clinical record data collection ( n = 300) was achieved. Approximately two-thirds of patients had a delirium episode during in-patient stay at both timepoints. A 6% absolute reduction in proportion of delirium days in those with a delirium episode was observed. Post-implementation improvements in guideline-adherent metrics include: clinical delirium diagnosis 15%–28%; delirium risk assessment 0%–16%; screening on admission 7%–35%.Conclusions:Collection of data on delirium outcomes and guideline-adherence from clinical records is feasible. The signal of patient benefit supports formal evaluation in a large-scale study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善临终关怀医院谵妄的检测、评估、管理和预防(DAMPen-D 研究):提供符合指南的谵妄护理的灵活、可扩展实施策略的可行性研究
背景:谵妄是一种复杂的病症,对所有相关人员都会造成压力。尽管谵妄在姑息关怀环境中非常普遍,但其诊断率仍然偏低,且与不良预后相关。目的:为未来的一项确定性研究提供信息,该研究将检验姑息关怀环境中旨在改善谵妄护理指南的实施策略是否能改善患者预后(减少谵妄住院天数比例)。设计:我们与患者参与成员一起开展了一项可行性研究,以评估安宁疗护人员(干预)对实施策略的接受度和参与度,以及临床记录数据收集过程(如谵妄护理指南)是否能改善患者预后。结果:2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 12 月期间,我们从 300 例连续入院患者中提取了临床记录数据。尽管数据收集工作在 COVID-19 期间进行,但临床记录数据收集目标(n = 300)已经实现。在这两个时间点,约有三分之二的患者在住院期间出现过谵妄。谵妄发作患者的谵妄天数比例绝对值减少了 6%。实施后,指南依从性指标的改善包括:临床谵妄诊断15%-28%;谵妄风险评估0%-16%;入院筛查7%-35%。结论:从临床记录中收集谵妄结果和指南依从性数据是可行的。结论:从临床记录中收集谵妄结果和指南遵循情况的数据是可行的,患者获益的信号支持在大规模研究中进行正式评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Utilizing intricate care networks: An ethnography of patients and families navigating palliative care in a resource-limited setting. Definition and recommendations of advance care planning: A Delphi study in five Asian sectors. Pharmacological treatment of pain, dyspnea, death rattle, fever, nausea, and vomiting in the last days of life in older people: A systematic review. A pragmatic approach to selecting a grading system for clinical practice recommendations in palliative care. 'A good ending but not the end': Exploring family preparations surrounding a relative's death and the Afterlife - A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1