Hemanshu Kaul, Rogers Mathew, Jeffrey A. Mudrock, Michael J. Pelsmajer
{"title":"Flexible list colorings: Maximizing the number of requests satisfied","authors":"Hemanshu Kaul, Rogers Mathew, Jeffrey A. Mudrock, Michael J. Pelsmajer","doi":"10.1002/jgt.23103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flexible list coloring was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle in 2019. Suppose <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>0</mn>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow></math>, <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> is a graph, <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow></math> is a list assignment for <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math>, and <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow></math> is a function with nonempty domain <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>D</mi>\n \n <mo>⊆</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math> such that <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>v</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∈</mo>\n \n <mi>L</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>v</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math> for each <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>v</mi>\n \n <mo>∈</mo>\n \n <mi>D</mi>\n </mrow></math> (<span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow></math> is called a request of <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow></math>). The triple <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>L</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math> is <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow></math>-satisfiable if there exists a proper <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow></math>-coloring <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>f</mi>\n </mrow></math> of <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> such that <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>f</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>v</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>v</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math> for at least <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n \n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mi>D</mi>\n \n <mo>∣</mo>\n </mrow></math> vertices in <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>D</mi>\n </mrow></math>. We say <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> is <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>-flexible if <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n \n <mo>′</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>′</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math> is <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow></math>-satisfiable whenever <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n \n <mo>′</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> is a <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow></math>-assignment for <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> and <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>′</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> is a request of <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n \n <mo>′</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math>. It was shown by Dvořák et al. that if <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>d</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow></math> is prime, <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> is a <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </mrow></math>-degenerate graph, and <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow></math> is a request for <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> with domain of size 1, then <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>L</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math> is 1-satisfiable whenever <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow></math> is a <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>d</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>-assignment. In this paper, we extend this result to all <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </mrow></math> for bipartite <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </mrow></math>-degenerate graphs.</p><p>The literature on flexible list coloring tends to focus on showing that for a fixed graph <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> and <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>∈</mo>\n \n <mi>N</mi>\n </mrow></math> there exists an <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n \n <mo>></mo>\n \n <mn>0</mn>\n </mrow></math> such that <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> is <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>-flexible, but it is natural to try to find the largest possible <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow></math> for which <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> is <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>-flexible. In this vein, we improve a result of Dvořák et al., by showing <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </mrow></math>-degenerate graphs are <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>d</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n \n <mo>∕</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>d</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>-flexible. In pursuit of the largest <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow></math> for which a graph is <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>-flexible, we observe that a graph <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> is not <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>-flexible for any <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow></math> if and only if <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n \n <mo>></mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n \n <mo>∕</mo>\n \n <mi>ρ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>, where <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>ρ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math> is the Hall ratio of <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math>, and we initiate the study of the <i>list flexibility number of a graph</i> <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math>, which is the smallest <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow></math> such that <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow></math> is <span></span><math>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n \n <mo>∕</mo>\n \n <mi>ρ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow></math>-flexible. We study relationships and connections between the list flexibility number, list chromatic number, list packing number, and degeneracy of a graph.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgt.23103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flexible list coloring was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle in 2019. Suppose , is a graph, is a list assignment for , and is a function with nonempty domain such that for each ( is called a request of ). The triple is -satisfiable if there exists a proper -coloring of such that for at least vertices in . We say is -flexible if is -satisfiable whenever is a -assignment for and is a request of . It was shown by Dvořák et al. that if is prime, is a -degenerate graph, and is a request for with domain of size 1, then is 1-satisfiable whenever is a -assignment. In this paper, we extend this result to all for bipartite -degenerate graphs.
The literature on flexible list coloring tends to focus on showing that for a fixed graph and there exists an such that is -flexible, but it is natural to try to find the largest possible for which is -flexible. In this vein, we improve a result of Dvořák et al., by showing -degenerate graphs are -flexible. In pursuit of the largest for which a graph is -flexible, we observe that a graph is not -flexible for any if and only if , where is the Hall ratio of , and we initiate the study of the list flexibility number of a graph , which is the smallest such that is -flexible. We study relationships and connections between the list flexibility number, list chromatic number, list packing number, and degeneracy of a graph.