Alcohol to-go sales policies at on-premise drinking establishments near large public US universities during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Alcohol and alcoholism Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1093/alcalc/agae023
Erika M Rosen, Andrew Walker, Pamela J Trangenstein, Cassidy R LoParco, Melvin D Livingston, Adam E Barry, Matthew E Rossheim
{"title":"Alcohol to-go sales policies at on-premise drinking establishments near large public US universities during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Erika M Rosen, Andrew Walker, Pamela J Trangenstein, Cassidy R LoParco, Melvin D Livingston, Adam E Barry, Matthew E Rossheim","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agae023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims Sweeping policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic increased alcohol availability through permitted to-go sales, potentially posing unique risks to college students. While to-go sales may make binge drinking more convenient, little remains known about these practices. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether drinking establishments’ to-go sales practices are associated with their other operational practices and state policy. Method This cross-sectional analysis included 221 randomly selected bars, nightclubs, and restaurants within two miles of a large public university. Telephone interviews assessed establishment practices, and the Alcohol Policy Information System provided state alcohol to-go laws. Regression models tested whether establishment to-go sales practices were associated with their business practices (logistic regression) and state policy (generalized estimating equations). Results Nearly one-half (44.8%) of drinking establishments sold alcohol to-go. Establishments with higher vodka prices had nearly 30% higher odds of selling spirits to-go (aOR = 1.29) and establishments offering happy hours specials had more than twice the odds of selling beer (aOR = 2.22), wine (aOR = 2.53), and spirits to-go (aOR = 2.60). Additionally, establishments that implemented physical distance requirements had higher odds of selling wine to-go (aOR = 3.00). State to-go laws were associated with higher odds of selling wine (aOR = 3.99) and spirits to-go (aOR = 5.43) in the full sample and beer to-go (aOR = 4.92) in urban counties. Conclusions Establishments that sell alcohol to-go tend to engage in other practices designed to drive sales. Evaluations of alcohol to-go sales laws on risky consumption among priority populations, including college students, are urgently needed to inform decisions about how to appropriately regulate sales.","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agae023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims Sweeping policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic increased alcohol availability through permitted to-go sales, potentially posing unique risks to college students. While to-go sales may make binge drinking more convenient, little remains known about these practices. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether drinking establishments’ to-go sales practices are associated with their other operational practices and state policy. Method This cross-sectional analysis included 221 randomly selected bars, nightclubs, and restaurants within two miles of a large public university. Telephone interviews assessed establishment practices, and the Alcohol Policy Information System provided state alcohol to-go laws. Regression models tested whether establishment to-go sales practices were associated with their business practices (logistic regression) and state policy (generalized estimating equations). Results Nearly one-half (44.8%) of drinking establishments sold alcohol to-go. Establishments with higher vodka prices had nearly 30% higher odds of selling spirits to-go (aOR = 1.29) and establishments offering happy hours specials had more than twice the odds of selling beer (aOR = 2.22), wine (aOR = 2.53), and spirits to-go (aOR = 2.60). Additionally, establishments that implemented physical distance requirements had higher odds of selling wine to-go (aOR = 3.00). State to-go laws were associated with higher odds of selling wine (aOR = 3.99) and spirits to-go (aOR = 5.43) in the full sample and beer to-go (aOR = 4.92) in urban counties. Conclusions Establishments that sell alcohol to-go tend to engage in other practices designed to drive sales. Evaluations of alcohol to-go sales laws on risky consumption among priority populations, including college students, are urgently needed to inform decisions about how to appropriately regulate sales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,美国大型公立大学附近的店内酒水销售政策
目的 在 COVID-19 大流行期间,大范围的政策变化通过允许外带销售增加了酒精的供应量,这可能会给大学生带来独特的风险。虽然外带销售可能会使狂饮变得更加方便,但人们对这些做法仍然知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在评估饮酒场所的即饮即售行为是否与其他经营行为和国家政策相关。方法 这项横断面分析包括在一所大型公立大学两英里范围内随机抽取的221家酒吧、夜总会和餐馆。电话访谈评估了场所的经营行为,酒精政策信息系统提供了各州的酒精外带法律。回归模型检验了场所的外带酒销售行为是否与其经营行为(逻辑回归)和州政策(广义估计方程)相关。结果 近二分之一(44.8%)的饮酒场所出售外带酒。伏特加价格较高的酒馆出售烈酒外带的几率高出近 30%(aOR = 1.29),提供欢乐时光特价的酒馆出售啤酒(aOR = 2.22)、葡萄酒(aOR = 2.53)和烈酒外带(aOR = 2.60)的几率是其他酒馆的两倍多。此外,实施物理距离要求的场所销售外带葡萄酒的几率更高(aOR = 3.00)。在全部样本中,各州的待售酒类法律与销售葡萄酒(aOR = 3.99)和烈性酒(aOR = 5.43)的几率较高有关,而在城市各县,销售啤酒(aOR = 4.92)的几率较高。结论 出售外带酒类的场所往往会采取其他旨在促进销售的做法。亟需评估酒类外卖销售法律对重点人群(包括大学生)风险消费的影响,以便为如何适当规范酒类外卖销售提供决策依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
期刊最新文献
Comparative effects of topiramate and naltrexone on neural activity during anticipatory anxiety in individuals with alcohol use disorder. Are long-term alcohol health harms overlooked in individuals with illicit drug problems? Alcohol-related morbidity and mortality in a Danish cohort of clients in residential rehabilitation for drug use disorders. Correction to: A rapid literature review of the effect of alcohol marketing on people with, or at increased risk of, an alcohol problem. Prospective changes in drinking during the COVID-19 pandemic among adults with unhealthy alcohol use. Drinking motives link positive and negative life events to problematic alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1