Combined hip arthroscopy with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia: a systematic review

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnae016
Kenneth J Lukas, Reza Ojaghi, Kednapa Thavorn, Sasha Carsen, Kevin Smit, Paul E Beaulé
{"title":"Combined hip arthroscopy with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia: a systematic review","authors":"Kenneth J Lukas, Reza Ojaghi, Kednapa Thavorn, Sasha Carsen, Kevin Smit, Paul E Beaulé","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnae016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a surgical procedure that corrects acetabular dysplasia without necessarily addressing intra-articular pathology. Hip arthroscopy is being increasingly used to address soft tissue pathologies at the time of a PAO. This review aims to determine patient-reported outcome measure scores (PROMs) of combining hip arthroscopy and PAO. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify English studies that reported upon patient populations that had PAO’s performed with arthroscopy at the time of surgery for correcting developmental hip dysplasia. We identified 428 articles; 14 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. Between 2011 and 2022, 1083 hips from the selected articles underwent a combined PAO and arthroscopic procedure, with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Of the studies that reported it, 63% of the evaluated population were found to have labral tears that required either labral repair (49%), labral debridement (12%) or combined procedure. Multiple PROMs were identified in the literature, with no standardized reporting system used between articles. All articles reported statistically improved patient-reported outcomes from a combined PAO and arthroscopy procedure. There was no difference in PROMs when comparing PAO performed with or without arthroscopy. One study suggested superior outcomes for active individuals who underwent PAO and arthroscopy. Patient-reported outcome scores improve significantly after PAO with or without arthroscopy, with no differences in adverse events, and only limited evidence that active individuals benefit from labral repair.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnae016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a surgical procedure that corrects acetabular dysplasia without necessarily addressing intra-articular pathology. Hip arthroscopy is being increasingly used to address soft tissue pathologies at the time of a PAO. This review aims to determine patient-reported outcome measure scores (PROMs) of combining hip arthroscopy and PAO. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify English studies that reported upon patient populations that had PAO’s performed with arthroscopy at the time of surgery for correcting developmental hip dysplasia. We identified 428 articles; 14 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. Between 2011 and 2022, 1083 hips from the selected articles underwent a combined PAO and arthroscopic procedure, with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Of the studies that reported it, 63% of the evaluated population were found to have labral tears that required either labral repair (49%), labral debridement (12%) or combined procedure. Multiple PROMs were identified in the literature, with no standardized reporting system used between articles. All articles reported statistically improved patient-reported outcomes from a combined PAO and arthroscopy procedure. There was no difference in PROMs when comparing PAO performed with or without arthroscopy. One study suggested superior outcomes for active individuals who underwent PAO and arthroscopy. Patient-reported outcome scores improve significantly after PAO with or without arthroscopy, with no differences in adverse events, and only limited evidence that active individuals benefit from labral repair.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节镜联合髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋关节发育不良:系统性综述
髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)是一种矫正髋臼发育不良的手术方法,但不一定要治疗关节内病变。髋关节镜越来越多地用于治疗 PAO 时的软组织病变。本综述旨在确定结合髋关节镜和 PAO 的患者报告结果测量评分 (PROM)。本系统性综述遵循《系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses)指南,以鉴别那些报告了在矫正发育性髋关节发育不良手术时进行 PAO 和关节镜手术的患者群体的英文研究。我们确定了 428 篇文章,其中 14 篇全文符合纳入标准。2011 年至 2022 年间,所选文章中有 1083 例髋关节接受了 PAO 和关节镜联合手术,平均随访时间为 3.7 年。在报告的研究中,63%的受评人群被发现有唇裂,需要进行唇裂修补术(49%)、唇裂清创术(12%)或联合手术。文献中发现了多种PROMs,但文章之间没有使用标准化的报告系统。所有文章都报告了 PAO 和关节镜联合手术在统计学上改善了患者报告的结果。在比较PAO与关节镜手术时,PROM没有差异。一项研究表明,接受 PAO 和关节镜手术的活跃患者的疗效更好。无论是否进行了关节镜手术,PAO术后患者报告的结果评分都有明显改善,不良事件方面没有差异,只有有限的证据表明活动量大的患者可从唇瓣修复术中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is core decompression and bone marrow concentrate with demineralized bone matrix and platelet-rich fibrin suitable for treating femoral head osteonecrosis? Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire specifically tailored for greater trochanteric pain syndrome for the Dutch population Self-reported preoperative anxiety and depression associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for periacetabular osteotomy and hip arthroscopy surgery Comparing outcomes of hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of borderline hip dysplasia: a systematic review Hip dysplasia-the Bernese contribution continues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1