Rosanna S. Kwok, Ihsan Nijem, Ann Brady, Robert Hendricks
{"title":"Implementation of a Three-Way Comparability Assessment for a Bioanalytical Anti-Drug Antibody Method","authors":"Rosanna S. Kwok, Ihsan Nijem, Ann Brady, Robert Hendricks","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00917-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Immunogenicity evaluation is a critical part of drug development. Regulatory guidelines from multiple health agencies provide recommendations for the development and validation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays to assess immunogenicity in clinical trials. These recommendations primarily describe an ADA method run in one bioanalytical laboratory supporting a biotherapeutic molecule; however, there are increasing instances that may necessitate the support of the ADA method being run in more than one laboratory. A program can rapidly expand into multiple clinical studies within one or multiple countries, where the most appropriate way to support the program is by having multiple laboratories perform ADA sample analysis. In addition, there may be certain country-specific challenges that may make it infeasible to transport samples outside of the country for analysis. China for example has a lengthy sample exportation process that has potential to negatively impact study timelines. If multiple laboratories analyze samples using the same ADA method, comparable method performance should be established. Here, we describe a three-way assessment of ADA assay comparability between two US-based bioanalytical laboratories and one based in China.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501692,"journal":{"name":"The AAPS Journal","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00917-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Immunogenicity evaluation is a critical part of drug development. Regulatory guidelines from multiple health agencies provide recommendations for the development and validation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays to assess immunogenicity in clinical trials. These recommendations primarily describe an ADA method run in one bioanalytical laboratory supporting a biotherapeutic molecule; however, there are increasing instances that may necessitate the support of the ADA method being run in more than one laboratory. A program can rapidly expand into multiple clinical studies within one or multiple countries, where the most appropriate way to support the program is by having multiple laboratories perform ADA sample analysis. In addition, there may be certain country-specific challenges that may make it infeasible to transport samples outside of the country for analysis. China for example has a lengthy sample exportation process that has potential to negatively impact study timelines. If multiple laboratories analyze samples using the same ADA method, comparable method performance should be established. Here, we describe a three-way assessment of ADA assay comparability between two US-based bioanalytical laboratories and one based in China.
免疫原性评估是药物开发的关键部分。多个卫生机构的监管指南对开发和验证抗药物抗体 (ADA) 检测方法提出了建议,以评估临床试验中的免疫原性。这些建议主要描述了在一个支持生物治疗分子的生物分析实验室中运行的 ADA 方法;然而,越来越多的情况可能需要在一个以上的实验室中运行 ADA 方法。一项计划可能会迅速扩展到一个或多个国家的多项临床研究,在这种情况下,支持该计划的最适当方式就是由多个实验室执行 ADA 样品分析。此外,某些国家可能会面临特定挑战,无法将样本运送到国外进行分析。例如,中国的样本出口流程较长,有可能对研究时间产生负面影响。如果多个实验室使用相同的 ADA 方法分析样本,则应确定方法性能的可比性。在此,我们介绍了对两家美国生物分析实验室和一家中国生物分析实验室的 ADA 分析可比性进行的三方评估。