Trust in Traditional Finance and Consumer Fintech Adoption

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Review of Corporate Finance Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1093/rcfs/cfae011
Deniz Okat, Mikael Paaso, Vesa Pursiainen
{"title":"Trust in Traditional Finance and Consumer Fintech Adoption","authors":"Deniz Okat, Mikael Paaso, Vesa Pursiainen","doi":"10.1093/rcfs/cfae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the role of trust in traditional finance in the consumer adoption of various fintech products, including cryptocurrencies, peer-to-peer lending, other crowdfunding, roboadvisors, and alternative payment solutions. Using an online lab experiment, an experiment on an investment website, and a representative survey of Dutch households, we find no consistent evidence that trust in banks affects fintech adoption in any of the product categories, although we find weak evidence suggesting that trust in banks positively affects interest in alternative payment apps. Our results do not support the narrative that trust in traditional finance is a major driver of fintech adoption. (JEL D14, G23, G41, G50)","PeriodicalId":44656,"journal":{"name":"Review of Corporate Finance Studies","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Corporate Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfae011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the role of trust in traditional finance in the consumer adoption of various fintech products, including cryptocurrencies, peer-to-peer lending, other crowdfunding, roboadvisors, and alternative payment solutions. Using an online lab experiment, an experiment on an investment website, and a representative survey of Dutch households, we find no consistent evidence that trust in banks affects fintech adoption in any of the product categories, although we find weak evidence suggesting that trust in banks positively affects interest in alternative payment apps. Our results do not support the narrative that trust in traditional finance is a major driver of fintech adoption. (JEL D14, G23, G41, G50)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对传统金融的信任与消费者对金融科技的采用
我们研究了对传统金融的信任在消费者采用各种金融科技产品(包括加密货币、点对点借贷、其他众筹、机器人顾问和替代支付解决方案)中所起的作用。通过在线实验室实验、投资网站实验和对荷兰家庭的代表性调查,我们没有发现一致的证据表明对银行的信任会影响金融科技在任何产品类别中的应用,尽管我们发现了微弱的证据表明对银行的信任会积极影响对替代支付应用程序的兴趣。我们的结果并不支持对传统金融的信任是金融科技应用的主要驱动力这一说法。(JEL D14, G23, G41, G50)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
1.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Review of Corporate Finance Studies (RCFS) is dedicated to publishing high-quality research in the expansive field of Corporate Finance. The journal seeks original contributions, reviewing papers based on their unique insights into Corporate Finance. This encompasses a wide spectrum, including a firm's interactions with stakeholders, capital markets, internal organization structure, compensation mechanisms, corporate governance, and capital management. RCFS also welcomes research in financial intermediation, financial institutions, microstructure, and the implications of asset pricing for Corporate Finance. The journal considers theoretical, empirical, and experimental papers for review.
期刊最新文献
Product Market Competition, Mergers and Acquisitions, and Covenant Redesign Higher Purpose, Employees, and the Firm Employer Dominance and Worker Earnings in Finance The Geography of Investor Attention Human Capital Reallocation across Firms: Evidence from Idiosyncratic Shocks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1