RuralHealthConnect: A network for evidence, innovation and action

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Australian Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1111/ajr.13118
Susi Tegen MBA, BA, DipEd, FAICD, FGIA, GCCM, GCRL
{"title":"RuralHealthConnect: A network for evidence, innovation and action","authors":"Susi Tegen MBA, BA, DipEd, FAICD, FGIA, GCCM, GCRL","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Federal and state governments invest millions of dollars to support the rural health sector to address the myriad of challenges not adequately addressed by the usual funding mechanisms, tools and levers. Rural clinicians, communities, researchers and entities that deliver care in rural Australia currently do not have access to what can learned, trends that are identified and what could be adapted in other communities.</p><p>The National Rural Health Alliance (the Alliance) and the <i>Australian Journal of Rural Health</i> (AJRH), with input from the National Rural Health Commissioner, have developed a proposal to address the challenge of inadequate evidence and information sharing and to promote capacity building, adaptation and innovation in rural health care and investment in education and training. The proposal combines the expertise and reach of all three entities and will draw together key rural health stakeholders in a steering committee.</p><p>With investment, the proposal aims to address the lack of information shared and learning from government funded research and programs that addresses declining medical and health workforce shortages, models of care, health care access discrepancies and health outcomes in rural areas compared with urban centres. Many initiatives have been implemented over past decade or are currently being trialled to achieve these goals, such as Innovative Models of Care (IMOC), Primary care Rural Integrated Multidisciplinary Models (PRIMM), as well as initiatives funded through the Medical Research Futures Fund (MRFF), the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and other bodies. These projects include rural research initiatives, multidisciplinary models of care, various workforce or distribution programs, community-led initiatives, actions by specific professions, quality improvement activities and innovative models of delivery and care.</p><p>Although funding may impact a particular community or individual, there is currently a lack of sharing information about what is being learned, what works, why and what challenges have arisen. Indeed, often individuals or communities are not aware of the array of projects that have been or are funded or where these communities or fund holders are located. This lack of communication means that other rural communities, who may be experiencing similar problems, often do not have access to the findings, lessons and emerging trends. There is insufficient cross-pollination of ideas to build capacity, increase adoption and ensure scale-up for maximum utility and impact on health outcomes.</p><p>Up to now, isolated researchers, policy-makers in government, managers, service users, service providers, not-for-profits, local governments, primary health networks (PHNs), workforce agencies, community members and entities that support communities have not been able to benefit from high-quality, multidimensional synthesise and analysis of what has been learned. This has hampered efforts to amend and develop policy and guidelines, to adapt models and approaches, and influence funding priorities to reflect emerging trends for optimal impact. This challenge is limiting the effectiveness and efficiency of innovative rural health care and education/training investment in Australia and beyond. Information exchange to foster cross-pollination of ideas, adaptation and capacity building in other communities is severely lacking.</p><p>Communities, not-for-profits, researchers and other stakeholders, including PHNs, workforce agencies, and local government, are not aware of the potential lessons of many previous projects.</p><p>The exchange of ideas, practices, resources, frameworks and outcomes fosters evidence-based learning and is fundamental to translational efforts, including scaling projects, especially as initiatives become increasingly community-driven, place-based and participatory.</p><p>However, valuable lessons from service and education initiatives are not being adequately translated, published in a suitable timeframe or applied beyond specific contexts to improve future rural health practice and education.</p><p>There is a pressing need to maximise the value of investment in rural health care for government, community and rural health stakeholders, sharing what is learnt, synthesising and identifying evidence for policy and practice, and identifying trends and learning opportunities, which also raise capacity and awareness in the regions. This will allow for adaptation and adoption across rural, remote and Indigenous Australia and ensures the translation of findings for policy, management, funding and delivery in real time.</p><p>RuralHealthConnect aims to improve access, connectivity, relevance and impact of multiple information sources to build evidence for action by rural health care providers, funders, workforce agencies, government departments, NGOs, universities and community members. It is designed to maximise government investment in rural programs, innovative models and workforce strategies, translating the outcomes of innovative rural health initiatives in Australia. Based on a close and ongoing collaboration with the inclusive community of practice, the RuralHealthConnect team will collate, collaboratively synthesise and generate evidence-based resources. RuralHealthConnect will ensure that ALL rural Australian communities and health care stakeholders learn from each other, benefit from high-quality and up-to-date evidence and gain maximum benefit from previous and current government investment and research.</p><p>The <b>RuralHealthConnect</b> will collate relevant contact information, reports, resources, evaluations, research and materials across rural and remote health, workforce and education initiatives. However, the primary value-adding function will be to conduct collaborative syntheses of the stored information and other resources, in an accessible and searchable manner.</p><p>The Hub will make available accessible evidence-based resources in various contemporary formats, in alignment with the needs of key stakeholders and in a practical, timely fashion. These resources will be drawn from collated information and collaborative syntheses and incorporate focused follow-up with stakeholders. The objective is to produce relevant contextual data that can inform models of healthcare delivery and workforce approaches in rural and remote areas of Australia, thus maximising the utility of government funding in this area. In addition, the Hub will have a training and mentoring dimension to make optimal use of the stored data and its unique skill base.</p><p><b>Susi Tegen:</b> Writing – original draft.</p>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"32 2","pages":"411-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.13118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Federal and state governments invest millions of dollars to support the rural health sector to address the myriad of challenges not adequately addressed by the usual funding mechanisms, tools and levers. Rural clinicians, communities, researchers and entities that deliver care in rural Australia currently do not have access to what can learned, trends that are identified and what could be adapted in other communities.

The National Rural Health Alliance (the Alliance) and the Australian Journal of Rural Health (AJRH), with input from the National Rural Health Commissioner, have developed a proposal to address the challenge of inadequate evidence and information sharing and to promote capacity building, adaptation and innovation in rural health care and investment in education and training. The proposal combines the expertise and reach of all three entities and will draw together key rural health stakeholders in a steering committee.

With investment, the proposal aims to address the lack of information shared and learning from government funded research and programs that addresses declining medical and health workforce shortages, models of care, health care access discrepancies and health outcomes in rural areas compared with urban centres. Many initiatives have been implemented over past decade or are currently being trialled to achieve these goals, such as Innovative Models of Care (IMOC), Primary care Rural Integrated Multidisciplinary Models (PRIMM), as well as initiatives funded through the Medical Research Futures Fund (MRFF), the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and other bodies. These projects include rural research initiatives, multidisciplinary models of care, various workforce or distribution programs, community-led initiatives, actions by specific professions, quality improvement activities and innovative models of delivery and care.

Although funding may impact a particular community or individual, there is currently a lack of sharing information about what is being learned, what works, why and what challenges have arisen. Indeed, often individuals or communities are not aware of the array of projects that have been or are funded or where these communities or fund holders are located. This lack of communication means that other rural communities, who may be experiencing similar problems, often do not have access to the findings, lessons and emerging trends. There is insufficient cross-pollination of ideas to build capacity, increase adoption and ensure scale-up for maximum utility and impact on health outcomes.

Up to now, isolated researchers, policy-makers in government, managers, service users, service providers, not-for-profits, local governments, primary health networks (PHNs), workforce agencies, community members and entities that support communities have not been able to benefit from high-quality, multidimensional synthesise and analysis of what has been learned. This has hampered efforts to amend and develop policy and guidelines, to adapt models and approaches, and influence funding priorities to reflect emerging trends for optimal impact. This challenge is limiting the effectiveness and efficiency of innovative rural health care and education/training investment in Australia and beyond. Information exchange to foster cross-pollination of ideas, adaptation and capacity building in other communities is severely lacking.

Communities, not-for-profits, researchers and other stakeholders, including PHNs, workforce agencies, and local government, are not aware of the potential lessons of many previous projects.

The exchange of ideas, practices, resources, frameworks and outcomes fosters evidence-based learning and is fundamental to translational efforts, including scaling projects, especially as initiatives become increasingly community-driven, place-based and participatory.

However, valuable lessons from service and education initiatives are not being adequately translated, published in a suitable timeframe or applied beyond specific contexts to improve future rural health practice and education.

There is a pressing need to maximise the value of investment in rural health care for government, community and rural health stakeholders, sharing what is learnt, synthesising and identifying evidence for policy and practice, and identifying trends and learning opportunities, which also raise capacity and awareness in the regions. This will allow for adaptation and adoption across rural, remote and Indigenous Australia and ensures the translation of findings for policy, management, funding and delivery in real time.

RuralHealthConnect aims to improve access, connectivity, relevance and impact of multiple information sources to build evidence for action by rural health care providers, funders, workforce agencies, government departments, NGOs, universities and community members. It is designed to maximise government investment in rural programs, innovative models and workforce strategies, translating the outcomes of innovative rural health initiatives in Australia. Based on a close and ongoing collaboration with the inclusive community of practice, the RuralHealthConnect team will collate, collaboratively synthesise and generate evidence-based resources. RuralHealthConnect will ensure that ALL rural Australian communities and health care stakeholders learn from each other, benefit from high-quality and up-to-date evidence and gain maximum benefit from previous and current government investment and research.

The RuralHealthConnect will collate relevant contact information, reports, resources, evaluations, research and materials across rural and remote health, workforce and education initiatives. However, the primary value-adding function will be to conduct collaborative syntheses of the stored information and other resources, in an accessible and searchable manner.

The Hub will make available accessible evidence-based resources in various contemporary formats, in alignment with the needs of key stakeholders and in a practical, timely fashion. These resources will be drawn from collated information and collaborative syntheses and incorporate focused follow-up with stakeholders. The objective is to produce relevant contextual data that can inform models of healthcare delivery and workforce approaches in rural and remote areas of Australia, thus maximising the utility of government funding in this area. In addition, the Hub will have a training and mentoring dimension to make optimal use of the stored data and its unique skill base.

Susi Tegen: Writing – original draft.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村健康连接:证据、创新和行动网络
联邦政府和州政府投入了数百万澳元支持农村卫生部门应对各种挑战,但通常的资助机制、工具和杠杆无法充分应对这些挑战。全国农村健康联盟(National Rural Health Alliance,简称联盟)和《澳大利亚农村健康杂志》(Australian Journal of Rural Health,简称 AJRH)在全国农村健康专员(National Rural Health Commissioner)的建议下,制定了一项提案,以应对证据和信息共享不足的挑战,并促进农村医疗保健的能力建设、调整和创新,以及对教育和培训的投资。通过投资,该提案旨在解决政府资助的研究和计划缺乏信息共享和学习的问题,这些研究和计划旨在解决农村地区与城市中心地区相比不断下降的医疗卫生劳动力短缺问题、医疗模式问题、医疗服务差异问题以及医疗成果问题。为实现这些目标,过去十年间已实施或正在试行许多举措,如创新护理模式(IMOC)、农村综合多学科初级护理模式(PRIMM),以及由未来医学研究基金(MRFF)、国家健康与医学研究委员会(NHMRC)和其他机构资助的举措。这些项目包括农村研究倡议、多学科护理模式、各种劳动力或分配计划、社区主导的倡议、特定专业的行动、质量改进活动以及创新的交付和护理模式。虽然资金可能会对特定社区或个人产生影响,但目前缺乏有关正在学习什么、什么有效、为什么以及出现了什么挑战的信息共享。事实上,个人或社区往往不知道有哪些项目已经或正在获得资助,也不知道这些社区或资助方位于何处。这种缺乏交流的情况意味着,可能遇到类似问题的其他农村社区往往无法获得相关的研究成果、经验教训和新趋势。迄今为止,孤立的研究人员、政府决策者、管理人员、服务使用者、服务提供者、非营利组织、地方政府、初级卫生网络(PHNs)、劳动力机构、社区成员和支持社区的实体都无法从对所学知识进行的高质量、多维度的综合与分析中获益。这阻碍了修订和制定政策和指导方针、调整模式和方法以及影响供资优先次序以反映新趋势从而产生最佳影响的努力。这一挑战限制了澳大利亚及其他地区创新型农村医疗保健和教育/培训投资的有效性和效率。社区、非营利组织、研究人员和其他利益相关者(包括公共卫生网络、劳动力机构和地方政府)并不了解许多以往项目的潜在经验教训。交流想法、做法、资源、框架和成果可以促进循证学习,对于转化工作(包括扩大项目规模)至关重要,尤其是在各项举措越来越多地由社区驱动、以地方为基础并具有参与性的情况下。然而,从服务和教育举措中汲取的宝贵经验并没有得到充分的转化,也没有在适当的时间框架内出版,或应用于特定环境之外,以改善未来的农村医疗实践和教育。当务之急是最大限度地提高政府、社区和农村医疗利益相关者在农村医疗保健方面的投资价值,分享所学到的知识,综合并确定政策和实践方面的证据,确定趋势和学习机会,同时提高各地区的能力和认识。RuralHealthConnect 旨在改善多种信息来源的访问、连接、相关性和影响,为农村医疗服务提供者、资助者、劳动力机构、政府部门、非政府组织、大学和社区成员的行动提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Does distance to hospital and interhospital transfer negatively impact time to definitive fixation and outcomes in patients with fractured neck of femur in a rural setting? Who stays? Australian alcohol and other drug work and worker characteristics predicting regional, rural and remote job retention. 'They got my back': Thematic analysis of relationship building in nurse home visiting in Aboriginal communities. Imaging personnel are key to improved imaging service delivery in rural areas. The 7Cs to reduce dental hesitancy for culturally and linguistically diverse rural Australians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1