Comparing e-bike and conventional bicycle use patterns in a public bike share system: A case study of Richmond, VA

Yifan Yang , Elliott Sloate , Nashid Khadem , Celeste Chavis , Vanessa Frías-Martínez
{"title":"Comparing e-bike and conventional bicycle use patterns in a public bike share system: A case study of Richmond, VA","authors":"Yifan Yang ,&nbsp;Elliott Sloate ,&nbsp;Nashid Khadem ,&nbsp;Celeste Chavis ,&nbsp;Vanessa Frías-Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2024.100023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bicycle-sharing systems have emerged as a viable transportation alternative in numerous urban areas, owing to their multifaceted benefits. These benefits include reduced transportation expenses, health improvements, and decreased emission levels. While extensive research has been conducted on travel behaviors in shared bicycle systems, there is currently a lack of research on travel behaviors changes with the introduction of e-bikes. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the similarities and differences between e-bike (pedelec) and conventional bicycle use in a bike share system in Richmond City, Virginia.</p><p>The results show that pedelecs are generally associated with longer trip distances, shorter trip times, higher speeds, and lower rates of uphill elevation change. The origin–destination analysis considering the business, mixed use, residential, and other uses shows extremely similar trends, with a large number of trips staying within either business or residential locations or mixed use. The roadway use analysis shows that pedelecs are used farther outside of the city than bikes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000147/pdfft?md5=8ca78b7bcb43a1d013dc453a0e38479a&pid=1-s2.0-S2950105924000147-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bicycle-sharing systems have emerged as a viable transportation alternative in numerous urban areas, owing to their multifaceted benefits. These benefits include reduced transportation expenses, health improvements, and decreased emission levels. While extensive research has been conducted on travel behaviors in shared bicycle systems, there is currently a lack of research on travel behaviors changes with the introduction of e-bikes. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the similarities and differences between e-bike (pedelec) and conventional bicycle use in a bike share system in Richmond City, Virginia.

The results show that pedelecs are generally associated with longer trip distances, shorter trip times, higher speeds, and lower rates of uphill elevation change. The origin–destination analysis considering the business, mixed use, residential, and other uses shows extremely similar trends, with a large number of trips staying within either business or residential locations or mixed use. The roadway use analysis shows that pedelecs are used farther outside of the city than bikes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较公共自行车共享系统中电动自行车和传统自行车的使用模式:弗吉尼亚州里士满案例研究
自行车共享系统因其多方面的好处,已成为许多城市地区可行的交通替代方案。这些好处包括减少交通费用、改善健康状况和降低排放水平。虽然对共享单车系统中的出行行为进行了大量研究,但目前还缺乏对引入电动自行车后出行行为变化的研究。本研究对弗吉尼亚州里士满市共享单车系统中电动自行车(脚踏车)与传统自行车使用的异同进行了全面分析。结果显示,脚踏车一般与较长的出行距离、较短的出行时间、较高的速度和较低的上坡坡度变化率相关。考虑到商业、混合用途、住宅和其他用途的出发地-目的地分析显示出极其相似的趋势,大量出行停留在商业、住宅或混合用途区域。道路使用分析表明,三轮车在城外的使用率高于自行车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing an E-Bike City: An automated process for network-wide multimodal road space reallocation Scooting into place: How comfort on different infrastructure types influences shared e-scooter trip making A deep reinforcement learning solution to help reduce the cost in waiting time of securing a traffic light for cyclists Bike users’ route choice behaviour: Expectations from electric bikes versus reality in Greater Helsinki Overtaking on rural roads – Cyclists' and motorists' perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1