Verifiable Quantum Advantage without Structure

IF 2.3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Journal of the ACM Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1145/3658665
Takashi Yamakawa, Mark Zhandry
{"title":"Verifiable Quantum Advantage without Structure","authors":"Takashi Yamakawa, Mark Zhandry","doi":"10.1145/3658665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We show the following hold, unconditionally unless otherwise stated, relative to a random oracle: <p><table border=\"0\" list-type=\"bullet\" width=\"95%\"><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>•</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>There are NP <i>search</i> problems solvable by quantum polynomial-time machines but not classical probabilistic polynomial-time machines.</p></td></tr><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>•</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>There exist functions that are one-way, and even collision resistant, against classical adversaries but are easily inverted quantumly. Similar counterexamples exist for digital signatures and CPA-secure public key encryption (the latter requiring the assumption of a classically CPA-secure encryption scheme). Interestingly, the counterexample does not necessarily extend to the case of other cryptographic objects such as PRGs.</p></td></tr><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>•</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>There are unconditional publicly verifiable proofs of quantumness with the minimal rounds of interaction: for uniform adversaries, the proofs are non-interactive, whereas for non-uniform adversaries the proofs are two message public coin.</p></td></tr><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>•</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>Our results do not appear to contradict the Aaronson-Ambanis conjecture. Assuming this conjecture, there exist publicly verifiable certifiable randomness, again with the minimal rounds of interaction.</p></td></tr></table></p>\nBy replacing the random oracle with a concrete cryptographic hash function such as SHA2, we obtain plausible Minicrypt instantiations of the above results. Previous analogous results all required substantial structure, either in terms of highly structured oracles and/or algebraic assumptions in Cryptomania and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":50022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ACM","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ACM","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3658665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We show the following hold, unconditionally unless otherwise stated, relative to a random oracle:

There are NP search problems solvable by quantum polynomial-time machines but not classical probabilistic polynomial-time machines.

There exist functions that are one-way, and even collision resistant, against classical adversaries but are easily inverted quantumly. Similar counterexamples exist for digital signatures and CPA-secure public key encryption (the latter requiring the assumption of a classically CPA-secure encryption scheme). Interestingly, the counterexample does not necessarily extend to the case of other cryptographic objects such as PRGs.

There are unconditional publicly verifiable proofs of quantumness with the minimal rounds of interaction: for uniform adversaries, the proofs are non-interactive, whereas for non-uniform adversaries the proofs are two message public coin.

Our results do not appear to contradict the Aaronson-Ambanis conjecture. Assuming this conjecture, there exist publicly verifiable certifiable randomness, again with the minimal rounds of interaction.

By replacing the random oracle with a concrete cryptographic hash function such as SHA2, we obtain plausible Minicrypt instantiations of the above results. Previous analogous results all required substantial structure, either in terms of highly structured oracles and/or algebraic assumptions in Cryptomania and beyond.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可验证的无结构量子优势
除非另有说明,否则我们将无条件地证明以下相对于随机甲骨文的观点是成立的:-量子多项式时间机器可以解决 NP 搜索问题,但经典概率多项式时间机器却不能。数字签名和 CPA 安全公钥加密(后者需要假设经典 CPA 安全加密方案)也存在类似的反例。有趣的是,这个反例并不一定会延伸到其他密码对象(如 PRGs)的情况。假定存在这个猜想,那么就存在可公开验证的可认证随机性,同样也需要最少轮次的交互。通过用具体的加密哈希函数(如 SHA2)代替随机甲骨文,我们得到了上述结果可信的 Minicrypt 实例。以前的类似结果都需要大量的结构,要么是高度结构化的神谕,要么是 Cryptomania 及其他的代数假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the ACM
Journal of the ACM 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The best indicator of the scope of the journal is provided by the areas covered by its Editorial Board. These areas change from time to time, as the field evolves. The following areas are currently covered by a member of the Editorial Board: Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization; Algorithms and Data Structures; Algorithms, Combinatorial Optimization, and Games; Artificial Intelligence; Complexity Theory; Computational Biology; Computational Geometry; Computer Graphics and Computer Vision; Computer-Aided Verification; Cryptography and Security; Cyber-Physical, Embedded, and Real-Time Systems; Database Systems and Theory; Distributed Computing; Economics and Computation; Information Theory; Logic and Computation; Logic, Algorithms, and Complexity; Machine Learning and Computational Learning Theory; Networking; Parallel Computing and Architecture; Programming Languages; Quantum Computing; Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis of Algorithms; Scientific Computing and High Performance Computing; Software Engineering; Web Algorithms and Data Mining
期刊最新文献
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling Transaction Fee Mechanism Design Sparse Higher Order Čech Filtrations Killing a Vortex Separations in Proof Complexity and TFNP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1