Trends in Number and Appropriateness of Prescription Medication Utilization among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the US: 2011-2020

Shaoxi Pan, Shanshan Li, Shaoxiang Jiang, Jung-Im Shin, Gordon G Liu, Hongyan Wu, Beini Lyu
{"title":"Trends in Number and Appropriateness of Prescription Medication Utilization among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the US: 2011-2020","authors":"Shaoxi Pan, Shanshan Li, Shaoxiang Jiang, Jung-Im Shin, Gordon G Liu, Hongyan Wu, Beini Lyu","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Contemporary data on the quantity and quality of medication use among older adults are lacking. This study examined recent trends in number and appropriateness of prescription medication use among older adults in the US. Method Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and March 2020 were used and 6336 adult participants aged 65 and older were included. We examined the number of prescription medication, prevalence of polypharmacy (≥5 prescription drugs), use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), and use of recommended medications (ACEI/ARBs plus beta-blockers among patients with heart failure and ACEI/ARBs among patients with albuminuria). Results There has been a slight increase in the prevalence of polypharmacy (39.3% in 2011-2012 to 43.8% in 2017-2020, p for trend= 0.32). Antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, antidiabetic medications, and antidepressants are the most commonly used medications. There was no substantial change in the use of PIM (17.0% to 14.7%). Less than 50% of older adults with heart failure received ACEI/ARBs plus beta-blockers (44.3% in 2017-2020) and approximately 50% patients with albuminuria received ACEI/ARBs (54.0 in 2017-2020), with no improvement over the study period. Polypharmacy, older age, female, and lower socioeconomic status generally were associated with greater use of PIM but lower use of recommended medications. Conclusions The medication burden remained high among older adults in the US and the appropriate utilization of medications did not improve in the recent decade. Our results underscore the need for greater attentions and interventions to the quality of medication use among older adults.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Contemporary data on the quantity and quality of medication use among older adults are lacking. This study examined recent trends in number and appropriateness of prescription medication use among older adults in the US. Method Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and March 2020 were used and 6336 adult participants aged 65 and older were included. We examined the number of prescription medication, prevalence of polypharmacy (≥5 prescription drugs), use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), and use of recommended medications (ACEI/ARBs plus beta-blockers among patients with heart failure and ACEI/ARBs among patients with albuminuria). Results There has been a slight increase in the prevalence of polypharmacy (39.3% in 2011-2012 to 43.8% in 2017-2020, p for trend= 0.32). Antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, antidiabetic medications, and antidepressants are the most commonly used medications. There was no substantial change in the use of PIM (17.0% to 14.7%). Less than 50% of older adults with heart failure received ACEI/ARBs plus beta-blockers (44.3% in 2017-2020) and approximately 50% patients with albuminuria received ACEI/ARBs (54.0 in 2017-2020), with no improvement over the study period. Polypharmacy, older age, female, and lower socioeconomic status generally were associated with greater use of PIM but lower use of recommended medications. Conclusions The medication burden remained high among older adults in the US and the appropriate utilization of medications did not improve in the recent decade. Our results underscore the need for greater attentions and interventions to the quality of medication use among older adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国居住在社区的老年人使用处方药的数量和适当性趋势:2011-2020 年
背景 缺乏有关老年人用药数量和质量的当代数据。本研究探讨了美国老年人处方药使用数量和适当性的最新趋势。方法 我们使用了 2011 年至 2020 年 3 月间美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据,纳入了 6336 名 65 岁及以上的成年参与者。我们研究了处方药的数量、多重用药(≥5 种处方药)的发生率、潜在不适当药物(PIM)的使用以及推荐药物(心力衰竭患者中的 ACEI/ARBs 加β-受体阻滞剂以及白蛋白尿患者中的 ACEI/ARBs)的使用。结果 多种药物的使用率略有上升(2011-2012 年为 39.3%,2017-2020 年为 43.8%,趋势 p=0.32)。抗高血压药、抗高血脂药、抗糖尿病药和抗抑郁药是最常用的药物。PIM的使用率(从17.0%降至14.7%)没有实质性变化。不到50%的心力衰竭老年人接受了ACEI/ARBs加β-受体阻滞剂治疗(2017-2020年为44.3%),约50%的白蛋白尿患者接受了ACEI/ARBs治疗(2017-2020年为54.0),在研究期间没有改善。多药、高龄、女性和较低的社会经济地位通常与更多使用 PIM 但较少使用推荐药物有关。结论 美国老年人的用药负担仍然很重,近十年来,合理用药的情况并没有改善。我们的研究结果表明,有必要加强对老年人用药质量的关注和干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does sleep moderate the effects of exercise training or complex mental and social activities on cognitive function in adults with chronic stroke? Secondary analysis of a randomized trial The influence of body mass index on biomarkers of cellular senescence in older adults Late-onset caloric restriction improves cognitive performance and restores circadian patterns of neurotrophic, clock and epigenetic factors in the hippocampus of male old rats Longitudinal Changes in Peak Expiratory Flow Predict Risk for Incident Dementia Association between TTV viremia, chronic inflammation, and ischemic heart disease risk: Insights from MARK-AGE and Report-Age projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1