Perceived barriers and enablers to utilising the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme for adults with an intellectual disability and their families: A scoping review

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1111/jar.13240
Alice Zubrinich, Gideon de Jong, Nasim Salehi, Richard Lakeman
{"title":"Perceived barriers and enablers to utilising the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme for adults with an intellectual disability and their families: A scoping review","authors":"Alice Zubrinich,&nbsp;Gideon de Jong,&nbsp;Nasim Salehi,&nbsp;Richard Lakeman","doi":"10.1111/jar.13240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The introduction of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in Australia in 2013 promised significant improvements in the lives of adults with intellectual disabilities. Although the scheme enables support, there are challenges associated with establishing eligibility and administering funds. This scoping review explored perceived barriers and enablers to effectively utilising the NDIS for adults with intellectual disabilities and their families.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review of the empirical literature on the NDIS and intellectual disabilities included nine studies in this review. These papers were subjected to thematic analysis and the findings were presented as a narrative synthesis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The key themes identified were: (1) Limited understanding of the NDIS process; (2) Language use and capacity assumptions; (3) Unrealistic goals and progress, and difficulty utilising plans; (4) Expectations of families and associated workloads; (5) Opening up opportunities not previously available; (6) Knowledgeable planners who actively seek to involve adults and their families.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although qualitative studies demonstrate that adults with an intellectual disability and their families are largely satisfied with the increased opportunities the NDIS has afforded them, there are various areas in which accessibility to services can be improved. In order for the NDIS to continue to improve, the results from this scoping review underline the need for adults with an intellectual disability and their support systems to have their voices heard and be utilised.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.13240","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The introduction of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in Australia in 2013 promised significant improvements in the lives of adults with intellectual disabilities. Although the scheme enables support, there are challenges associated with establishing eligibility and administering funds. This scoping review explored perceived barriers and enablers to effectively utilising the NDIS for adults with intellectual disabilities and their families.

Method

A scoping review of the empirical literature on the NDIS and intellectual disabilities included nine studies in this review. These papers were subjected to thematic analysis and the findings were presented as a narrative synthesis.

Results

The key themes identified were: (1) Limited understanding of the NDIS process; (2) Language use and capacity assumptions; (3) Unrealistic goals and progress, and difficulty utilising plans; (4) Expectations of families and associated workloads; (5) Opening up opportunities not previously available; (6) Knowledgeable planners who actively seek to involve adults and their families.

Conclusion

Although qualitative studies demonstrate that adults with an intellectual disability and their families are largely satisfied with the increased opportunities the NDIS has afforded them, there are various areas in which accessibility to services can be improved. In order for the NDIS to continue to improve, the results from this scoping review underline the need for adults with an intellectual disability and their support systems to have their voices heard and be utilised.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障成人及其家庭在使用澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划时遇到的障碍和推动因素:范围审查
背景 澳大利亚于 2013 年推出国家残疾保险计划(NDIS),承诺大幅改善智障成人的生活。尽管该计划能够提供支持,但在确定资格和管理资金方面仍存在挑战。本范围界定综述探讨了智障成人及其家庭在有效利用 NDIS 时所遇到的障碍和推动因素。 方法 对有关 NDIS 和智障的实证文献进行的范围界定审查将九项研究纳入了本审查。对这些文献进行了主题分析,并以叙述性综合报告的形式介绍了分析结果。 结果 确定的关键主题有(1) 对 NDIS 程序的理解有限;(2) 语言使用和能力假设;(3) 不切实际的目标和进展,以及利用计划的困难;(4) 家庭的期望和相关的工作量;(5) 提供以前没有的机会;(6) 积极寻求成人及其家庭参与的有知识的规划者。 结论 尽管定性研究表明,智障成人及其家人对 NDIS 为他们带来的更多机会基本满意,但仍有许多方面可以改进服务的可及性。为了使 NDIS 继续得到改善,本次范围界定审查的结果突出表明,有必要倾听智障成人及其支持系统的意见并加以利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent Validity of Abbreviated Walk Tests Among Adults With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disability Adapting Complicated Grief Therapy for Use With People With Intellectual Disabilities: An Action Research Study Correction to “‘A Potentially Ticking Time Bomb’—Barriers for Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease in People With Intellectual Disabilities” Using a Capability Approach to Explore How People With Intellectual Disabilities Can Lead Flourishing Lives ‘It's Not Like a One-Way Street’: Using Photovoice to Understand How College Students With Intellectual Disability Experience Interdependence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1