Current practice and safety measures in epilepsy monitoring units in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A cross-sectional study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107361
Bandar N. Aljafen , Ruwa A. Alneseyan , Mohamed H. Bahr , Taim A. Muayqil , Faisal Al-Otaibi
{"title":"Current practice and safety measures in epilepsy monitoring units in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Bandar N. Aljafen ,&nbsp;Ruwa A. Alneseyan ,&nbsp;Mohamed H. Bahr ,&nbsp;Taim A. Muayqil ,&nbsp;Faisal Al-Otaibi","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An increasing number of Epilepsy Monitoring Units (EMU) display various practices and safety protocols. EMU settings should meet clear, standardized safety protocols to avoid seizure adverse events (SAE). We aim to provide the foundational framework facilitating the establishment of unified evidence-based safety regulations to address the practices and safety measures implemented within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this cross-sectional study, EMU directors in the GCC were contacted directly by phone to personally complete an electronic 37-item questionnaire sent via text messages and email. From January 2021–December 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen EMUs from six GCC countries participated in the study. All EMU directors responded to the study. Twelve (70.6%) EMUs monitored adults and children, five (29.4%) monitored adults, and none monitored children only. The number of certified epileptologists in the EMUs ranged from one to eight per unit. Fifteen (88.2%) EMUs applied a continuous observation pattern, whereas two (11.8%) performed daytime only. The precautions most commonly used in the video Electroencephalogram (EEG) were seizure pads and bedside oxygen in 15 EMUs (88.2%). For invasive EEG, seizure pads were used in 9 EMUs (52.9%), %) and IV access in 8 EMUs (47.1%). The occurrence of adverse events varied among EMUs. The most common conditions were postictal psychosis 10 (58.8%), injuries 7 (41.2%), and status epilepticus 6 (35.3%). Falls were mainly related to missed seizures or delayed recognition by video monitors in 8 EMUs (47.1%). The extended EMU stay was because of an insufficient number of recorded seizures in 16 EMUs (94.1%), poor seizure lateralization and localization in 10 (58.8%), and re-introduction of AEDs in nine (52.9%). All EMUs had written acute seizure and status epilepticus management protocols. A postictal psychosis management protocol was available for 10 (58.8%). Medications were withdrawn before admission in 6 EMUs (35.3%). The specific medication withdrawal speed protocol upon admission was available in 7 EMUs (41.2%). Pre-admission withdrawal of medication demonstrated a shorter length of stay in both video and invasive EEG, which was statistically significant (<em>ρ</em> (15) = −.529, <em>p</em> =.029; <em>ρ</em> (7) = −.694, <em>p</em> =.038; respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The practice and safety regulations of EMUs in the GCC vary widely. Each EMU reported the occurrences of SAE and injuries. Precautions, protective measures, and management protocols must be reassessed to minimize the number of SAEs and increase the safety of the EMU.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000767/pdfft?md5=8fb0a9145b25addfa431fba1555a8477&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000767-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An increasing number of Epilepsy Monitoring Units (EMU) display various practices and safety protocols. EMU settings should meet clear, standardized safety protocols to avoid seizure adverse events (SAE). We aim to provide the foundational framework facilitating the establishment of unified evidence-based safety regulations to address the practices and safety measures implemented within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, EMU directors in the GCC were contacted directly by phone to personally complete an electronic 37-item questionnaire sent via text messages and email. From January 2021–December 2021.

Results

Seventeen EMUs from six GCC countries participated in the study. All EMU directors responded to the study. Twelve (70.6%) EMUs monitored adults and children, five (29.4%) monitored adults, and none monitored children only. The number of certified epileptologists in the EMUs ranged from one to eight per unit. Fifteen (88.2%) EMUs applied a continuous observation pattern, whereas two (11.8%) performed daytime only. The precautions most commonly used in the video Electroencephalogram (EEG) were seizure pads and bedside oxygen in 15 EMUs (88.2%). For invasive EEG, seizure pads were used in 9 EMUs (52.9%), %) and IV access in 8 EMUs (47.1%). The occurrence of adverse events varied among EMUs. The most common conditions were postictal psychosis 10 (58.8%), injuries 7 (41.2%), and status epilepticus 6 (35.3%). Falls were mainly related to missed seizures or delayed recognition by video monitors in 8 EMUs (47.1%). The extended EMU stay was because of an insufficient number of recorded seizures in 16 EMUs (94.1%), poor seizure lateralization and localization in 10 (58.8%), and re-introduction of AEDs in nine (52.9%). All EMUs had written acute seizure and status epilepticus management protocols. A postictal psychosis management protocol was available for 10 (58.8%). Medications were withdrawn before admission in 6 EMUs (35.3%). The specific medication withdrawal speed protocol upon admission was available in 7 EMUs (41.2%). Pre-admission withdrawal of medication demonstrated a shorter length of stay in both video and invasive EEG, which was statistically significant (ρ (15) = −.529, p =.029; ρ (7) = −.694, p =.038; respectively).

Conclusion

The practice and safety regulations of EMUs in the GCC vary widely. Each EMU reported the occurrences of SAE and injuries. Precautions, protective measures, and management protocols must be reassessed to minimize the number of SAEs and increase the safety of the EMU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海湾合作委员会国家癫痫监测单位的现行做法和安全措施:横断面研究
背景越来越多的癫痫监护室(EMU)采用各种不同的做法和安全协议。EMU 的设置应符合明确、标准化的安全协议,以避免癫痫发作不良事件 (SAE)。我们的目标是提供基础框架,促进建立统一的循证安全法规,以解决海湾合作委员会(GCC)内实施的做法和安全措施。方法在这项横断面研究中,我们通过电话直接联系了海湾合作委员会的癫痫监测室主任,让他们亲自填写通过短信和电子邮件发送的 37 项电子问卷。结果来自六个海湾合作委员会国家的 17 所教育管理大学参与了这项研究。所有教育管理单位的负责人都对研究做出了回应。12家(70.6%)癫痫监护病房同时监护成人和儿童,5家(29.4%)监护成人,没有一家只监护儿童。每个监护病房的认证癫痫专家人数从1人到8人不等。15个监护室(88.2%)采用连续观察模式,而2个监护室(11.8%)仅在白天进行观察。在视频脑电图(EEG)中,最常用的预防措施是癫痫发作垫和床边吸氧,有15个监护病房(88.2%)采用了这种方法。在有创脑电图检查中,9 个监护病房(52.9%)使用了癫痫发作垫,8 个监护病房(47.1%)使用了静脉通路。)各监护病房的不良事件发生率各不相同。最常见的情况是发作后精神病 10 例(58.8%)、受伤 7 例(41.2%)和癫痫状态 6 例(35.3%)。在8个监护病房(47.1%)中,跌倒主要与错过癫痫发作或视频监控器识别延迟有关。有16个监护病房(94.1%)因记录的癫痫发作次数不足,10个监护病房(58.8%)因癫痫发作侧位和定位不清,9个监护病房(52.9%)因重新使用AEDs而延长了监护病房的逗留时间。所有监护病房都制定了书面的急性发作和癫痫状态管理方案。有10所监护病房(58.8%)制定了发作后精神病治疗方案。6所监护病房(35.3%)在入院前已停药。有7个监护病房(41.2%)在入院时制定了具体的停药速度方案。入院前停药缩短了视频和有创脑电图的住院时间,具有统计学意义(ρ (15) = -.529, p =.029; ρ (7) = -.694, p =.038;分别为)。每个监测单位都报告了 SAE 和伤害的发生情况。必须重新评估预防措施、保护措施和管理规程,以最大限度地减少 SAE 的数量,提高监护病房的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cannabis use, sleep and mood disturbances among persons with epilepsy – A clinical and polysomnography study from a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center Evaluating the late seizures of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion via monitoring using continuous electroencephalogram Validation of hemispherectomy outcome prediction scale in treatment of medically intractable epilepsy MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers of response to modified Atkins diet in treatment of adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1