Expanding eligibility and improving quality of cervical cancer screening in Estonia: The 2021 reforms

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105077
Samuel Rigby , Rachel Greenley , Anneli Uuskula , Anna Tisler , Maria Suurna , Maris Jesse , Marc Bardou , Martin McKee , CBIG-SCREEN Consortium
{"title":"Expanding eligibility and improving quality of cervical cancer screening in Estonia: The 2021 reforms","authors":"Samuel Rigby ,&nbsp;Rachel Greenley ,&nbsp;Anneli Uuskula ,&nbsp;Anna Tisler ,&nbsp;Maria Suurna ,&nbsp;Maris Jesse ,&nbsp;Marc Bardou ,&nbsp;Martin McKee ,&nbsp;CBIG-SCREEN Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Estonia has one of the highest death rates from cervical cancer in the European Union despite having had a population-based screening programme for over 15 years.</p><p>In 2021, this high disease burden, alongside a new national cancer prevention plan, prompted a series of cervical cancer screening programme reforms to address low screening uptake and evidence of variable screening test quality.</p><p>The reforms had three main elements: expansion of eligibility to all women aged 30–65 regardless of insurance status; increasing test provision by enabling family physicians to take screening samples and introducing self-sampling; and improving testing procedures, replacing cytology with HPV testing as the primary screening test.</p><p>Although the impact of these changes is yet to be seen, early signs suggest increased programme participation. However, at 51 %, further action to address barriers to uptake will likely be necessary.</p><p>If Estonia is to avoid another period of policy dormancy, as happened between 2006 and 2021, greater clarity on screening programme accountability is required. The establishment of the National Cancer Screening Group may enable this. The first test will be the delivery of an end<span>-</span>to-end evaluation of the reformed programme, with an emphasis on equity of access. The next step will be to develop and deliver solutions that respond to these needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 105077"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024000873/pdfft?md5=9f109599d8c88ee0ad6e6b0b1f285360&pid=1-s2.0-S0168851024000873-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024000873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estonia has one of the highest death rates from cervical cancer in the European Union despite having had a population-based screening programme for over 15 years.

In 2021, this high disease burden, alongside a new national cancer prevention plan, prompted a series of cervical cancer screening programme reforms to address low screening uptake and evidence of variable screening test quality.

The reforms had three main elements: expansion of eligibility to all women aged 30–65 regardless of insurance status; increasing test provision by enabling family physicians to take screening samples and introducing self-sampling; and improving testing procedures, replacing cytology with HPV testing as the primary screening test.

Although the impact of these changes is yet to be seen, early signs suggest increased programme participation. However, at 51 %, further action to address barriers to uptake will likely be necessary.

If Estonia is to avoid another period of policy dormancy, as happened between 2006 and 2021, greater clarity on screening programme accountability is required. The establishment of the National Cancer Screening Group may enable this. The first test will be the delivery of an end-to-end evaluation of the reformed programme, with an emphasis on equity of access. The next step will be to develop and deliver solutions that respond to these needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在爱沙尼亚扩大宫颈癌筛查资格并提高质量:2021 年改革
2021 年,这种高疾病负担以及新的国家癌症预防计划促使爱沙尼亚进行了一系列宫颈癌筛查计划改革,以解决筛查率低和筛查检测质量参差不齐的问题。这些改革有三大要素:将筛查资格扩大到所有 30-65 岁的妇女,无论其保险状况如何;通过让家庭医生采集筛查样本和引入自我采样,增加检测供应;以及改进检测程序,以 HPV 检测取代细胞学检测作为主要筛查检测。如果爱沙尼亚要避免再次出现 2006 年至 2021 年的政策休眠期,就必须进一步明确筛查计划的责任。全国癌症筛查小组的成立可能会促成这一点。第一个考验将是对改革后的计划进行端到端评估,重点是公平获取。下一步将是制定和实施满足这些需求的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
期刊最新文献
How COVID-19 illness perceptions and individual shocks are associated with trust during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa. Implementing integrated care infrastructure: A longitudinal study on the interplay of policies, interorganizational arrangements and interoperability in NHS England. Public contributions to R&D of medical innovations: A framework for analysis. What mechanisms lead to the endurance of health and social care integration? A multiple case study in Italy. The right to health for socioeconomically disadvantaged TB patients in South Korea: An AAAQ framework analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1