Impact of Eucalyptus plantations on ecosystem services in the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2024.100393
Abdurohman Yimam , Asnake Mekuriaw , Dessie Assefa , Woldeamlak Bewket
{"title":"Impact of Eucalyptus plantations on ecosystem services in the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia","authors":"Abdurohman Yimam ,&nbsp;Asnake Mekuriaw ,&nbsp;Dessie Assefa ,&nbsp;Woldeamlak Bewket","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the Northern highlands of Ethiopia, Eucalyptus plantations have been widely established since the 1970s. However, there have been debates and concerns about the impact of these plantations on ecosystem services. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the impact of monoculture Eucalyptus plantations on ecosystem service values (ESVs) in the upper Blue Nile part of Ethiopia. We used Landsat satellite images (captured in 1993, 2004, 2014, and 2023) for land use/cover assessment. The images were classified using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm in the R open-source software. For ecosystem services valuation, we used the benefit transfer method, which allowed us to estimate ESVs by applying both global and local value transfer coefficients. The results show a significant expansion of Eucalyptus plantations, with the highest net change (180%) between 1991 and 2023. The estimated global ESVs ranged from US$206 million in 1991 to US$208 million in 2023, with croplands contributing the largest share (75%). However, specific ESVs related to nutrient cycling, habitat refuge, pollination, and culture declined due to decreasing ESVs of forest land, shrub land, and grazing land over the study period (1991–2023). In addition, ESVs associated with food production declined in the latter period (2014–2023) due to the conversion of croplands into Eucalyptus plantations and shrub lands. This study highlights the need for informed decision-making in land use systems, considering the trade-off between increasing productivity and the loss of other ecosystem functions and services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724000618/pdfft?md5=88a3e2170aa2f09fb7d1445f19315c80&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972724000618-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724000618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Northern highlands of Ethiopia, Eucalyptus plantations have been widely established since the 1970s. However, there have been debates and concerns about the impact of these plantations on ecosystem services. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the impact of monoculture Eucalyptus plantations on ecosystem service values (ESVs) in the upper Blue Nile part of Ethiopia. We used Landsat satellite images (captured in 1993, 2004, 2014, and 2023) for land use/cover assessment. The images were classified using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm in the R open-source software. For ecosystem services valuation, we used the benefit transfer method, which allowed us to estimate ESVs by applying both global and local value transfer coefficients. The results show a significant expansion of Eucalyptus plantations, with the highest net change (180%) between 1991 and 2023. The estimated global ESVs ranged from US$206 million in 1991 to US$208 million in 2023, with croplands contributing the largest share (75%). However, specific ESVs related to nutrient cycling, habitat refuge, pollination, and culture declined due to decreasing ESVs of forest land, shrub land, and grazing land over the study period (1991–2023). In addition, ESVs associated with food production declined in the latter period (2014–2023) due to the conversion of croplands into Eucalyptus plantations and shrub lands. This study highlights the need for informed decision-making in land use systems, considering the trade-off between increasing productivity and the loss of other ecosystem functions and services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桉树种植对埃塞俄比亚上青尼罗河流域生态系统服务的影响
自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,埃塞俄比亚北部高地广泛种植桉树。然而,关于这些种植园对生态系统服务的影响一直存在争议和担忧。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚青尼罗河上游地区单一种植桉树对生态系统服务价值(ESV)的影响。我们使用 Landsat 卫星图像(拍摄于 1993 年、2004 年、2014 年和 2023 年)进行土地利用/覆盖评估。我们使用 R 开源软件中的随机森林(RF)算法对图像进行了分类。在生态系统服务估值方面,我们采用了效益转移法,通过应用全球和本地价值转移系数来估算生态系统服务价值。结果显示,桉树种植面积大幅扩大,1991 年至 2023 年间的净变化最大(180%)。估计的全球 ESV 从 1991 年的 2.06 亿美元到 2023 年的 2.08 亿美元不等,其中耕地所占份额最大(75%)。然而,在研究期间(1991-2023 年),由于林地、灌木林地和牧场的 ESV 值下降,与养分循环、栖息地避难所、授粉和养殖相关的特定 ESV 值也有所下降。此外,在后期(2014-2023 年),由于耕地被转化为桉树种植园和灌木林地,与粮食生产相关的 ESV 也有所下降。本研究强调了在土地利用系统中进行知情决策的必要性,同时考虑到提高生产力与丧失其他生态系统功能和服务之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Umbrella index as a conservation tool across pondscapes: A case study using frogs, aquatic insects, and plants in South Africa Climate change vulnerability and adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers: A financing gap perspective Assessing the efficacy of green walls versus street green lanes in mitigating air pollution: A critical evaluation The hidden development patterns of Africa and their sustainability correlations Effects of extension service on the uptake of climate-smart sorghum production practices: Insights from drylands of Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1