Pseudoaneurysm formation following transarterial embolization of traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula with detachable balloon: An institutional cohort long-term study

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING World journal of radiology Pub Date : 2024-04-28 DOI:10.4329/wjr.v16.i4.94
Prasert Iampreechakul, Korrapakc Wangtanaphat, Songpol Chuntaroj, Yodkhwan Wattanasen, Sunisa Hangsapruek, Punjama Lertbutsayanukul, Pimchanok Puthkhao, S. Siriwimonmas
{"title":"Pseudoaneurysm formation following transarterial embolization of traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula with detachable balloon: An institutional cohort long-term study","authors":"Prasert Iampreechakul, Korrapakc Wangtanaphat, Songpol Chuntaroj, Yodkhwan Wattanasen, Sunisa Hangsapruek, Punjama Lertbutsayanukul, Pimchanok Puthkhao, S. Siriwimonmas","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v16.i4.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n The goal of therapy for traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula (TCCF) is the elimination of fistula while maintaining patency of the parent artery. The treatment for TCCF has evolved from surgery to endovascular management using detachable balloons, coils, liquid embolic agents, covered stents, or flow-diverter stent through arterial or venous approaches. Despite the withdrawal of detachable balloons from the market in the United States since 2004, transarterial embolization with detachable balloons has currently remained the best initial treatment for TCCF in several countries. However, the pseudoaneurysm formation following transarterial detachable balloon embolization has rarely been observed in long-term follow-up.\n AIM\n To determine the occurrence and long-term follow-up of pseudoaneurysm after transarterial detachable balloon for TCCF.\n METHODS\n Between January 2009 and December 2019, 79 patients diagnosed with TCCF were treated using detachable latex balloons (GOLDBAL) of four sizes. Pseudoaneurysm sizes were stratified into five grades for analysis. Initial and follow-up assessments involved computed tomography angiography at 1 month, 6 month, 1 year, and longer intervals for significant cases. Clinical follow-ups occurred semi-annually for 2 years, then annually. Factors analyzed included sex, age, fistula size and location, and balloon size.\n RESULTS\n In our cohort of 79 patients treated for TCCF, pseudoaneurysms formed in 67.1%, with classifications ranging from grade 0 to grade 3; no grade 4 or giant pseudoaneurysms were observed. The majority of pseudoaneurysms did not progress in size, and some regressed spontaneously. Calcifications developed in most large pseudoaneurysms over 5-10 years. Parent artery occlusion occurred in 7.6% and recurrent fistulas in 16.5%. The primary risk factors for pseudoaneurysm formation were identified as the use of specific balloon sizes, with balloon SP and No. 6 significantly associated with its occurrence (P = 0.005 and P = 0.002, respectively), whereas sex, age, fistula size, location, and the number of balloons used were not significant predictors.\n CONCLUSION\n Pseudoaneurysm formation following detachable balloon embolization for TCCF is common, primarily influenced by the size of the balloon used. Despite this, all patients with pseudoaneurysms remained asymptomatic during long-term follow-up.","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v16.i4.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The goal of therapy for traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula (TCCF) is the elimination of fistula while maintaining patency of the parent artery. The treatment for TCCF has evolved from surgery to endovascular management using detachable balloons, coils, liquid embolic agents, covered stents, or flow-diverter stent through arterial or venous approaches. Despite the withdrawal of detachable balloons from the market in the United States since 2004, transarterial embolization with detachable balloons has currently remained the best initial treatment for TCCF in several countries. However, the pseudoaneurysm formation following transarterial detachable balloon embolization has rarely been observed in long-term follow-up. AIM To determine the occurrence and long-term follow-up of pseudoaneurysm after transarterial detachable balloon for TCCF. METHODS Between January 2009 and December 2019, 79 patients diagnosed with TCCF were treated using detachable latex balloons (GOLDBAL) of four sizes. Pseudoaneurysm sizes were stratified into five grades for analysis. Initial and follow-up assessments involved computed tomography angiography at 1 month, 6 month, 1 year, and longer intervals for significant cases. Clinical follow-ups occurred semi-annually for 2 years, then annually. Factors analyzed included sex, age, fistula size and location, and balloon size. RESULTS In our cohort of 79 patients treated for TCCF, pseudoaneurysms formed in 67.1%, with classifications ranging from grade 0 to grade 3; no grade 4 or giant pseudoaneurysms were observed. The majority of pseudoaneurysms did not progress in size, and some regressed spontaneously. Calcifications developed in most large pseudoaneurysms over 5-10 years. Parent artery occlusion occurred in 7.6% and recurrent fistulas in 16.5%. The primary risk factors for pseudoaneurysm formation were identified as the use of specific balloon sizes, with balloon SP and No. 6 significantly associated with its occurrence (P = 0.005 and P = 0.002, respectively), whereas sex, age, fistula size, location, and the number of balloons used were not significant predictors. CONCLUSION Pseudoaneurysm formation following detachable balloon embolization for TCCF is common, primarily influenced by the size of the balloon used. Despite this, all patients with pseudoaneurysms remained asymptomatic during long-term follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用可拆卸球囊经动脉栓塞治疗外伤性颈动脉-海绵窦瘘后假动脉瘤的形成:一项机构队列长期研究
背景创伤性颈动脉海绵瘘(TCCF)的治疗目标是在保持母动脉通畅的同时消除瘘管。TCCF 的治疗方法已从手术发展到通过动脉或静脉途径使用可拆卸球囊、线圈、液体栓塞剂、有盖支架或分流支架进行血管内治疗。尽管可分离球囊自 2004 年起在美国退出市场,但在一些国家,使用可分离球囊进行经动脉栓塞目前仍是治疗 TCCF 的最佳初始疗法。然而,经动脉可分离球囊栓塞术后假性动脉瘤的形成在长期随访中很少被观察到。目的 探讨经动脉可取球囊治疗 TCCF 后假性动脉瘤的发生率和长期随访情况。方法 2009年1月至2019年12月期间,使用四种规格的可分离乳胶球囊(GOLDBAL)治疗了79例确诊为TCCF的患者。假性动脉瘤大小分为五个等级进行分析。初次和随访评估包括 1 个月、6 个月、1 年的计算机断层扫描血管造影,重大病例的评估间隔时间更长。临床随访每半年进行一次,为期两年,之后每年进行一次。分析因素包括性别、年龄、瘘管大小和位置以及球囊大小。结果 在我们治疗的 79 例 TCCF 患者中,67.1% 形成了假性动脉瘤,分级从 0 级到 3 级不等;未观察到 4 级或巨大假性动脉瘤。大多数假性动脉瘤的大小没有增大,有些会自动消退。大多数大的假性动脉瘤在 5-10 年后出现钙化。7.6%的假动脉瘤发生了母动脉闭塞,16.5%的假动脉瘤发生了复发性瘘。假性动脉瘤形成的主要风险因素是使用特定尺寸的球囊,其中 SP 号和 6 号球囊与假性动脉瘤的形成有显著相关性(分别为 P = 0.005 和 P = 0.002),而性别、年龄、瘘管大小、位置和使用球囊的数量则无显著预测作用。结论 可分离球囊栓塞治疗 TCCF 后形成假性动脉瘤很常见,主要受所用球囊大小的影响。尽管如此,所有假性动脉瘤患者在长期随访期间仍无症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World journal of radiology
World journal of radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
8.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence software for assessing brain ischemic penumbra/core infarction on computed tomography perfusion: A real-world accuracy study. Direct visualization of postoperative aortobronchial fistula on computed tomography. Multimodal imaging for the diagnosis of oligodendroglioma associated with arteriovenous malformation: A case report. Perianal tuberculous ulcer with active pulmonary, intestinal and orificial tuberculosis: A case report. Plea to radiologists: Please consider Mahvash disease when encountering an enlarged pancreas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1