Mental flexibility and epistemic trust through implicit social learning – A meta-model of change processes in psychotherapy with personality disorders

Q2 Psychology Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.32872/cpe.12433
Svenja Taubner, Carla Sharp
{"title":"Mental flexibility and epistemic trust through implicit social learning – A meta-model of change processes in psychotherapy with personality disorders","authors":"Svenja Taubner, Carla Sharp","doi":"10.32872/cpe.12433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This position paper follows the call for transtheoretical meta-models of general clinical change by concentrating on severe mental illness such as Personality Disorders (PDs). We have identified a core process of change related to mental flexibility through implicit learning and propose recommendations for stance and technique that are informed by research on Mentalization-Based-Treatment (MBT) and the learning components as represented in the Mediational Intervention for Sensitizing Caregivers (MISC). While the idea of corrective emotional experience as a general change mechanism involves discriminating between an old and new relationship to update relationship knowledge, the capacity to understand and process corrective emotional experiences may be limited and even iatrogenic in patients with PDs. By integrating MBT and MISC, a meta-model of change is created that allows training in and observation of the granular-level, behaviorally anchored, actions taken by the therapist to open up social learning. Here, social learning is conceptualized as epistemic trust, increasing the client’s reflective functioning during sessions to ultimately enhance cognitive flexibility outside the therapy room. This opens the possibility to implement and observe micro changes in what should be termed now implicit cognitive and emotional corrective experiences. Thus, we propose to shift towards implicit learning within professional relationships; that is, internalizing a new way of thinking about any life-event that requires adaption thereby creating adaptive capacities via mental flexibility as the general change mechanism of Personality Disorder (PD) treatment.","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This position paper follows the call for transtheoretical meta-models of general clinical change by concentrating on severe mental illness such as Personality Disorders (PDs). We have identified a core process of change related to mental flexibility through implicit learning and propose recommendations for stance and technique that are informed by research on Mentalization-Based-Treatment (MBT) and the learning components as represented in the Mediational Intervention for Sensitizing Caregivers (MISC). While the idea of corrective emotional experience as a general change mechanism involves discriminating between an old and new relationship to update relationship knowledge, the capacity to understand and process corrective emotional experiences may be limited and even iatrogenic in patients with PDs. By integrating MBT and MISC, a meta-model of change is created that allows training in and observation of the granular-level, behaviorally anchored, actions taken by the therapist to open up social learning. Here, social learning is conceptualized as epistemic trust, increasing the client’s reflective functioning during sessions to ultimately enhance cognitive flexibility outside the therapy room. This opens the possibility to implement and observe micro changes in what should be termed now implicit cognitive and emotional corrective experiences. Thus, we propose to shift towards implicit learning within professional relationships; that is, internalizing a new way of thinking about any life-event that requires adaption thereby creating adaptive capacities via mental flexibility as the general change mechanism of Personality Disorder (PD) treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过内隐社会学习实现心理灵活性和认识信任--人格障碍心理治疗变化过程的元模型
本立场文件关注人格障碍(PDs)等严重精神疾病,响应了建立一般临床改变的跨理论元模型的号召。我们通过内隐学习确定了一个与心理灵活性相关的核心改变过程,并根据心理化治疗(MBT)的研究以及感化护理人员中介干预(MISC)中的学习内容,提出了立场和技巧方面的建议。作为一种普遍的改变机制,纠正情绪体验的理念涉及对新旧关系的辨别,以更新关系知识,但对于帕金森病患者来说,理解和处理纠正情绪体验的能力可能有限,甚至是先天性的。通过整合 MBT 和 MISC,创建了一种变革元模型,允许对治疗师采取的细粒度、行为锚定行动进行培训和观察,从而开启社会学习。在这里,社会学习被概念化为认识信任,在治疗过程中提高客户的反思功能,最终增强治疗室外的认知灵活性。这就为实施和观察微观变化提供了可能性,这些微观变化现在应被称为内隐认知和情绪矫正体验。因此,我们建议在专业关系中转向内隐式学习;即对任何需要适应的生活事件内化一种新的思维方式,从而通过心理灵活性创造适应能力,作为人格障碍(PD)治疗的一般改变机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Practice Make Perfect? The Effects of an Eight-Week Manualized Deliberate Practice Course With Peer Feedback on Patient-Rated Working Alliance in Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Impulsive Buying and Deferment of Gratification Among Adults With ADHD. Learning a Practical Psychotherapeutic Skill in Higher Education in Sweden: A Conceptual Paper Concerning the Importance of Constructive Alignment When Teaching Therapeutic Alliance. Longitudinal Associations of Experiential and Reflective Dimensions of Meaning in Life With Psychopathological Symptoms. The Effects of Mindfulness-Focused Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Elevated Levels of Stress and Symptoms of Exhaustion Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1