Validity of the Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Yuta Miyazaki, T. Hara, Kazuki Hagiwara, Takuya Nakamura, Akiko Kamimura, Eri Takeshita, Hirofumi Komaki, Katsuhiro Mizuno, Tetsuya Tsuji, Masahiro Abo
{"title":"Validity of the Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy","authors":"Yuta Miyazaki, T. Hara, Kazuki Hagiwara, Takuya Nakamura, Akiko Kamimura, Eri Takeshita, Hirofumi Komaki, Katsuhiro Mizuno, Tetsuya Tsuji, Masahiro Abo","doi":"10.2490/prm.20240016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: Some upper-limb function assessments can evaluate treatments in the non-ambulatory stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities (FCUE) was developed for DMD in Japan. The FCUE is easier to use than the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) and is more detailed than the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of FCUE with other methods of assessment for DMD. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 39 boys with DMD from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry to evaluate the concurrent validity of the FCUE and PUL using non-parametric Spearman rank correlation (ρ). We also determined the concurrent validity of the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale and PUL for comparison. Results: The ρ value between the FCUE and PUL was −0.914 (P<0.001). The FCUE showed robust concurrent validity with the PUL. That correlation between the FCUE and Brooke Upper Extremity Scale gave a ρ value of −0.854 (P<0.001). Conclusions: The FCUE had a higher concurrent validity with the PUL than with the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. The FCUE is considered a valid assessment tool of upper-limb function in boys with DMD. Selecting the best assessment method depends on the severity of the patient’s condition and a balance between assessment accuracy and evaluation time.","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"80 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: Some upper-limb function assessments can evaluate treatments in the non-ambulatory stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities (FCUE) was developed for DMD in Japan. The FCUE is easier to use than the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) and is more detailed than the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of FCUE with other methods of assessment for DMD. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 39 boys with DMD from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry to evaluate the concurrent validity of the FCUE and PUL using non-parametric Spearman rank correlation (ρ). We also determined the concurrent validity of the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale and PUL for comparison. Results: The ρ value between the FCUE and PUL was −0.914 (P<0.001). The FCUE showed robust concurrent validity with the PUL. That correlation between the FCUE and Brooke Upper Extremity Scale gave a ρ value of −0.854 (P<0.001). Conclusions: The FCUE had a higher concurrent validity with the PUL than with the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. The FCUE is considered a valid assessment tool of upper-limb function in boys with DMD. Selecting the best assessment method depends on the severity of the patient’s condition and a balance between assessment accuracy and evaluation time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症上肢功能分类的有效性
摘要 目的:一些上肢功能评估可以对杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)非行走阶段的治疗进行评估。上肢功能分类(FCUE)是日本针对 DMD 而开发的。FCUE 比上肢功能量表 (PUL) 更容易使用,比布鲁克上肢功能量表 (Brooke Upper Extremity Scale) 更详细。本研究旨在确定 FCUE 与其他 DMD 评估方法的并发有效性。方法:这项回顾性研究回顾了国家神经病学和精神病学中心的 39 名 DMD 男孩的病历,使用非参数斯皮尔曼秩相关性 (ρ) 评估了 FCUE 和 PUL 的并发有效性。我们还测定了布鲁克上肢量表和 PUL 的并发有效性,以进行比较。结果FCUE和PUL之间的ρ值为-0.914(P<0.001)。FCUE与PUL显示出很强的并发有效性。FCUE与布鲁克上肢量表之间的相关性ρ值为-0.854(P<0.001)。结论与布鲁克上肢量表相比,功能性评定UE与PUL的并发效度更高。FCUE 被认为是评估 DMD 男孩上肢功能的有效工具。选择最佳评估方法取决于患者病情的严重程度以及评估准确性和评估时间之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Delayed Postoperative Rehabilitation on Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Relationship between Physical Function and Quality of Life in Elderly People Requiring Long-term Care. Preoperative Posterior Pelvic Tilt Angle is Associated with Decreased Gait Speed and Hip Function in Older Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis. Refractory Severe Anti-SRP Myopathy that Improved with Long-term Rehabilitation Therapy: A Case Report. Therapeutic Intervention for Trunk Control Impairments in Central Nervous System Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Methods and Efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1