Nicotine information disclosed online by e-cigarette brands popular with young people

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.18332/tpc/186953
Clara Rykaczewski, A. Tackett, Elizabeth G Klein, Jill M Singer, Bo Lu, Loren E Wold, Dylan D Wagner, Megan E Roberts
{"title":"Nicotine information disclosed online by e-cigarette brands popular with young people","authors":"Clara Rykaczewski, A. Tackett, Elizabeth G Klein, Jill M Singer, Bo Lu, Loren E Wold, Dylan D Wagner, Megan E Roberts","doi":"10.18332/tpc/186953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION E-cigarette use is most prevalent among adolescents and young adults – and there are often misperceptions about product risk. The purpose of this study was to determine what nicotine information is provided on e-cigarette brand websites. METHODS Based on national and local surveys, we identified 44 e-cigarette brands commonly used in the US by adolescents and young adults. For each of these brands, their associated websites were analyzed for disclosed nicotine information. Specifically, for each brand’s website, we coded whether there was information on nicotine concentration (recorded if a numerical value was provided such as ‘5% nicotine’), nicotine form (free-base, nicotine salts, or not stated), and nicotine type (tobacco-derived, synthetically derived, or not stated). Coding allowed for both lay (e.g. ‘nic salts’) as well as scientific (e.g. ‘isomers’) terms. RESULTS Of the 44 brands examined, all provided basic information on nicotine concentration (e.g. ‘5% nicotine’). However, 23% of brands did not disclose information on nicotine form (i.e. nicotine salt vs free-base), and 66% of brands did not disclose information on nicotine type (i.e. synthetic vs tobacco-derived). CONCLUSIONS Overall, these results suggest that the e-cigarette industry is not fully informing its consumers about the nicotine in their products. Given that nicotine form and type have implications for e-cigarette addiction potential, these findings highlight a public health concern. There is a need for more comprehensive national regulations for mandating product constituents and emissions disclosures.","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/186953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION E-cigarette use is most prevalent among adolescents and young adults – and there are often misperceptions about product risk. The purpose of this study was to determine what nicotine information is provided on e-cigarette brand websites. METHODS Based on national and local surveys, we identified 44 e-cigarette brands commonly used in the US by adolescents and young adults. For each of these brands, their associated websites were analyzed for disclosed nicotine information. Specifically, for each brand’s website, we coded whether there was information on nicotine concentration (recorded if a numerical value was provided such as ‘5% nicotine’), nicotine form (free-base, nicotine salts, or not stated), and nicotine type (tobacco-derived, synthetically derived, or not stated). Coding allowed for both lay (e.g. ‘nic salts’) as well as scientific (e.g. ‘isomers’) terms. RESULTS Of the 44 brands examined, all provided basic information on nicotine concentration (e.g. ‘5% nicotine’). However, 23% of brands did not disclose information on nicotine form (i.e. nicotine salt vs free-base), and 66% of brands did not disclose information on nicotine type (i.e. synthetic vs tobacco-derived). CONCLUSIONS Overall, these results suggest that the e-cigarette industry is not fully informing its consumers about the nicotine in their products. Given that nicotine form and type have implications for e-cigarette addiction potential, these findings highlight a public health concern. There is a need for more comprehensive national regulations for mandating product constituents and emissions disclosures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受年轻人欢迎的电子烟品牌在网上披露尼古丁信息
引言 电子烟的使用在青少年和年轻成年人中最为普遍--他们往往对产品风险存在误解。本研究旨在确定电子烟品牌网站提供了哪些尼古丁信息。方法 根据全国和地方调查,我们确定了美国青少年常用的 44 个电子烟品牌。我们对每个品牌的相关网站进行了分析,以了解其披露的尼古丁信息。具体来说,对于每个品牌的网站,我们对是否有尼古丁浓度(如果提供了数值,如 "5% 尼古丁",则记录在案)、尼古丁形式(游离碱、尼古丁盐或未说明)和尼古丁类型(烟草衍生、合成衍生或未说明)等信息进行编码。编码允许使用外行术语(如 "尼古丁盐")和科学术语(如 "异构体")。结果 在所调查的 44 个品牌中,所有品牌都提供了尼古丁浓度的基本信息(如 "5%尼古丁")。然而,23%的品牌没有披露尼古丁形式的信息(即尼古丁盐与游离碱),66%的品牌没有披露尼古丁类型的信息(即合成尼古丁与烟草提取尼古丁)。结论 总体而言,这些结果表明电子烟行业没有向消费者充分告知其产品中的尼古丁。鉴于尼古丁的形式和类型会对电子烟成瘾的可能性产生影响,这些研究结果凸显了一个公共卫生问题。有必要制定更全面的国家法规,强制要求披露产品成分和排放情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of e-cigarettes among young adults in Cape Town, South Africa: Insights from focus groups to inform regulations and prevention strategies. Factors associated with support for social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Georgia and Armenia. The history of smoking cessation support in Hungary: A narrative review The history of smoking cessation support in Hungary: A narrative review Marketing of nicotinamide as nicotine replacement in electronic cigarettes and smokeless tobacco.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1