The information, control, and value models of mobile health-driven empowerment

IF 2.1 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1111/bioe.13294
Jesse Gray, Seppe Segers, Heidi Mertes
{"title":"The information, control, and value models of mobile health-driven empowerment","authors":"Jesse Gray,&nbsp;Seppe Segers,&nbsp;Heidi Mertes","doi":"10.1111/bioe.13294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mobile health tools are often said to empower users by providing them with the information they need to exercise control over their health. We aim to bring clarity to this claim, and in doing so explore the relationship between empowerment and autonomy. We have identified three distinct models embedded in the empowerment rhetoric: empowerment as information, empowerment as control, and empowerment as values. Each distinct model of empowerment gives rise to an associated problem. These problems, the Problem of Interpretation, the Value Alignment Problem, and the Priority Problem, show that mobile health tools in their current form are either insufficient for empowerment or are self-defeating. These digital health technologies encourage users to adopt an individualized conception of autonomy, one that may weaken the doctor–patient relationship and undermine practices in shared decision making, and ultimately may not deliver on improving the health outcomes for those that need it the most.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":"39 5","pages":"460-466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.13294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile health tools are often said to empower users by providing them with the information they need to exercise control over their health. We aim to bring clarity to this claim, and in doing so explore the relationship between empowerment and autonomy. We have identified three distinct models embedded in the empowerment rhetoric: empowerment as information, empowerment as control, and empowerment as values. Each distinct model of empowerment gives rise to an associated problem. These problems, the Problem of Interpretation, the Value Alignment Problem, and the Priority Problem, show that mobile health tools in their current form are either insufficient for empowerment or are self-defeating. These digital health technologies encourage users to adopt an individualized conception of autonomy, one that may weaken the doctor–patient relationship and undermine practices in shared decision making, and ultimately may not deliver on improving the health outcomes for those that need it the most.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动医疗赋权的信息、控制和价值模式。
人们常说,移动医疗工具能为用户提供控制自身健康所需的信息,从而增强用户的能力。我们的目标是澄清这一说法,并在此过程中探索赋权与自主之间的关系。我们已经确定了三种不同的赋权模式:作为信息的赋权、作为控制的赋权和作为价值观的赋权。每一种不同的赋权模式都会产生一个相关的问题。这些问题,即 "解释问题"、"价值一致性问题 "和 "优先权问题",表明目前形式的移动医疗工具要么不足以增强能力,要么会弄巧成拙。这些数字医疗技术鼓励用户采用个性化的自主概念,这种概念可能会削弱医患关系,破坏共同决策的实践,最终可能无法改善那些最需要帮助的人的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
期刊最新文献
What Is Space Bioethics? Ethical Counseling on Assisted Suicide in German and Swiss Right-To-Die Organizations: Challenges and Perspectives. The Ethics of Wegovy in Pediatric Mental Health. Informed Consent for Research Participation During Space Exploration: Ethical Issues. Clinical Ethicists and Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): Possible Roles and Challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1