Exploring the distribution and cognitive profiles of poor readers across varying levels of reading difficulty: implications for identification and support

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Research in Reading Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1111/1467-9817.12454
Mike Sleeman, John Everatt, Alison Arrow, Amanda Denston
{"title":"Exploring the distribution and cognitive profiles of poor readers across varying levels of reading difficulty: implications for identification and support","authors":"Mike Sleeman,&nbsp;John Everatt,&nbsp;Alison Arrow,&nbsp;Amanda Denston","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study explored the impact of different cut-off points used to identify children with reading difficulties on the distribution of these children across the three poor reader groups predicted by the simple view of reading (dyslexia, specific comprehension difficulty and mixed difficulty). Additionally, the study investigated whether the cognitive profiles of these poor reader groups remained consistent across varying levels of reading impairment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included 209 primary school children from New Zealand, in Years 4–6 and aged 8–10 years, who experienced reading comprehension difficulties. Using a two-step cluster analysis, participants were assigned to one of three poor reader groups: dyslexia, specific comprehension difficulty (SCD) and mixed difficulty. We examined the distribution of children across these groups at eight levels of reading comprehension difficulty and conducted strengths and weaknesses profiles at four levels of reading ability across 14 tests that assessed a range of reading-related skills. Additionally, we compared the performance of children in these groups who performed above and below the 10th percentile on a reading comprehension assessment across these tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results showed that the proportion of children assigned to each group varied across the reading levels, with children at the lower end of the reading comprehension continuum more likely to exhibit the mixed difficulty profile than the SCD and dyslexia profiles. Overall, the research found that dyslexia, SCD and mixed difficulty profiles could be identified at all levels of reading comprehension difficulty, though weaknesses in their reading-related skills increased as reading comprehension difficulties also increased.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that struggling readers demonstrate distinct cognitive profiles across all levels of reading ability. These results have important implications for identifying and supporting struggling readers, as well as enhancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of reading difficulties. The possible relationship between the results obtained in this study and tiered models of reading support is discussed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"47 4","pages":"431-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9817.12454","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study explored the impact of different cut-off points used to identify children with reading difficulties on the distribution of these children across the three poor reader groups predicted by the simple view of reading (dyslexia, specific comprehension difficulty and mixed difficulty). Additionally, the study investigated whether the cognitive profiles of these poor reader groups remained consistent across varying levels of reading impairment.

Methods

This study included 209 primary school children from New Zealand, in Years 4–6 and aged 8–10 years, who experienced reading comprehension difficulties. Using a two-step cluster analysis, participants were assigned to one of three poor reader groups: dyslexia, specific comprehension difficulty (SCD) and mixed difficulty. We examined the distribution of children across these groups at eight levels of reading comprehension difficulty and conducted strengths and weaknesses profiles at four levels of reading ability across 14 tests that assessed a range of reading-related skills. Additionally, we compared the performance of children in these groups who performed above and below the 10th percentile on a reading comprehension assessment across these tests.

Results

The results showed that the proportion of children assigned to each group varied across the reading levels, with children at the lower end of the reading comprehension continuum more likely to exhibit the mixed difficulty profile than the SCD and dyslexia profiles. Overall, the research found that dyslexia, SCD and mixed difficulty profiles could be identified at all levels of reading comprehension difficulty, though weaknesses in their reading-related skills increased as reading comprehension difficulties also increased.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that struggling readers demonstrate distinct cognitive profiles across all levels of reading ability. These results have important implications for identifying and supporting struggling readers, as well as enhancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of reading difficulties. The possible relationship between the results obtained in this study and tiered models of reading support is discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索不同阅读难度的贫困读者的分布和认知概况:对识别和支持的影响
本研究探讨了用于识别阅读困难儿童的不同分界点对这些儿童在简单阅读观所预测的三个阅读困难群体(阅读障碍、特定理解困难和混合困难)中的分布所产生的影响。此外,该研究还调查了这些阅读障碍群体的认知特征是否在不同程度的阅读障碍中保持一致。该研究包括 209 名新西兰小学 4-6 年级、8-10 岁、有阅读理解困难的儿童。通过两步聚类分析法,参与者被归入三个阅读障碍群体之一:阅读障碍、特殊理解困难(SCD)和混合困难。我们研究了这些组别中儿童在八个阅读理解困难水平上的分布情况,并通过 14 项评估一系列阅读相关技能的测试,对四个阅读能力水平上的儿童进行了优缺点分析。此外,我们还比较了这些组别中在这些测试的阅读理解能力评估中成绩高于和低于第 10 百分位数的儿童的表现。结果显示,被分配到各个阅读水平组别的儿童比例各不相同,处于阅读理解能力连续统一体低端的儿童更有可能表现出混合难度特征,而不是 SCD 和阅读障碍特征。总之,研究发现,在阅读理解难度的各个水平上,都可以识别出阅读障碍、特殊阅读障碍和混合困难的特征,尽管随着阅读理解难度的增加,他们在阅读相关技能方面的弱点也在增加。这些结果对于识别和支持有学习困难的读者以及加深我们对阅读困难内在机制的理解具有重要意义。我们还讨论了本研究结果与分层阅读支持模式之间可能存在的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information What we have learned about learning to read in a digital age and children's contemporary reading experiences Evidence-based support provided to struggling readers in later primary years in the UK: A scoping review Using orthographic support to reduce the impact of noise on oral vocabulary learning in adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1