Frequent disengagement and subsequent mortality among people living with HIV and Hepatitis C in Canada: A prospective cohort study

Sahar Saeed, Tyler Thomas, Duy Dinh, Erica Moodie, Joseph Cox, Curtis Cooper, John Gill, V. Martel-Laferrière, Dimitra Panagiotoglou, Sharon Walmsley, Alexander Wong, M. Klein
{"title":"Frequent disengagement and subsequent mortality among people living with HIV and Hepatitis C in Canada: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Sahar Saeed, Tyler Thomas, Duy Dinh, Erica Moodie, Joseph Cox, Curtis Cooper, John Gill, V. Martel-Laferrière, Dimitra Panagiotoglou, Sharon Walmsley, Alexander Wong, M. Klein","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The cascade of care, commonly used to assess HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) health service delivery, has limitations in capturing the complexity of individuals’ engagement patterns. This study examines the dynamic nature of engagement and mortality trajectories among people living with HIV and HCV.\n \n \n \n We used data from the Canadian HIV-HCV Co-Infection Cohort, which prospectively follows 2098 participants from 18 centers bi-annually. Markov multi-state models were used to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with transitioning between the following states: (1) Lost-to-follow-up (LTFU), defined as no visit for 18 months; (2) Re-engaged (re-entry into cohort after being LTFU); (3) Withdrawn from the study (i.e. moved); (4) Death; otherwise remained (5) engaged-in-care.\n \n \n \n 1809 participants met the eligibility criteria and contributed 12,591 person-years from 2003-2022. LTFU was common, with 46% experiencing at least one episode, of whom only 57% re-engaged. One in five (n = 383) participants died during the study. Participants who transitioned to LTFU were twice as likely to die as those who were consistently engaged. Factors associated with transitioning to LTFU included detectable HCV RNA (aHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13, 1.67), evidence of HCV treatment but no sustained virologic response (SVR) result (aHR 1.99, 95% CI 1.56, 2.53) and recent incarceration (aHR 1.94 95% CI 1.58, 2.40). Being Indigenous was a significant predictor of death across all engagement trajectories.\n \n \n \n Disengagement from clinical care was common and resulted in higher death rates. People LTFU were more likely to require HCV treatment highlighting a priority population for elimination strategies.\n","PeriodicalId":510506,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cascade of care, commonly used to assess HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) health service delivery, has limitations in capturing the complexity of individuals’ engagement patterns. This study examines the dynamic nature of engagement and mortality trajectories among people living with HIV and HCV. We used data from the Canadian HIV-HCV Co-Infection Cohort, which prospectively follows 2098 participants from 18 centers bi-annually. Markov multi-state models were used to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with transitioning between the following states: (1) Lost-to-follow-up (LTFU), defined as no visit for 18 months; (2) Re-engaged (re-entry into cohort after being LTFU); (3) Withdrawn from the study (i.e. moved); (4) Death; otherwise remained (5) engaged-in-care. 1809 participants met the eligibility criteria and contributed 12,591 person-years from 2003-2022. LTFU was common, with 46% experiencing at least one episode, of whom only 57% re-engaged. One in five (n = 383) participants died during the study. Participants who transitioned to LTFU were twice as likely to die as those who were consistently engaged. Factors associated with transitioning to LTFU included detectable HCV RNA (aHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13, 1.67), evidence of HCV treatment but no sustained virologic response (SVR) result (aHR 1.99, 95% CI 1.56, 2.53) and recent incarceration (aHR 1.94 95% CI 1.58, 2.40). Being Indigenous was a significant predictor of death across all engagement trajectories. Disengagement from clinical care was common and resulted in higher death rates. People LTFU were more likely to require HCV treatment highlighting a priority population for elimination strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大艾滋病病毒感染者和丙型肝炎患者的频繁脱离与后续死亡率:前瞻性队列研究
通常用于评估 HIV 和丙型肝炎 (HCV) 医疗服务提供情况的级联护理在捕捉个人参与模式的复杂性方面存在局限性。本研究探讨了艾滋病病毒感染者和丙型肝炎病毒感染者参与治疗和死亡轨迹的动态性质。 我们使用了加拿大 HIV-HCV 共同感染队列的数据,该队列每半年对来自 18 个中心的 2098 名参与者进行一次前瞻性跟踪。我们使用马尔可夫多状态模型来评估与在以下状态之间转换相关的社会人口学和临床因素:(1)失去随访(LTFU),定义为 18 个月未就诊;(2)重新参与(LTFU 后重新进入队列);(3)退出研究(即搬家);(4)死亡;否则仍为(5)参与护理。 1809 名参与者符合资格标准,在 2003-2022 年期间贡献了 12,591 人年。失访现象很普遍,46%的人至少失访过一次,其中只有 57% 的人重新参与了护理。五分之一(n = 383)的参与者在研究期间死亡。过渡到 "LTFU "的参与者的死亡几率是持续参与的参与者的两倍。与转入长期治疗相关的因素包括:可检测到的 HCV RNA(aHR 1.37,95% CI 1.13,1.67)、HCV 治疗证据但无持续病毒学应答 (SVR) 结果(aHR 1.99,95% CI 1.56,2.53)以及近期入狱(aHR 1.94,95% CI 1.58,2.40)。在所有参与轨迹中,土著居民都是死亡的重要预测因素。 脱离临床治疗是常见现象,并导致较高的死亡率。LTFU人群更有可能需要接受HCV治疗,这也是消除策略的重点人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Staphylococcus aureus bacterial load and colonization sites with the risk of postoperative S. aureus infection Estimating and explaining the differences in healthcare seeking by symptom burden among persons with presumptive tuberculosis. Findings from a population-based tuberculosis prevalence survey in a high-burden setting in India Higher Prevalence of Immunosuppression Among US Adults: Implications for COVID-19 and Respiratory Pathogen Vaccinations High hepatitis B prevalence and vaccination needs among transgender women and men sex workers in Barcelona, Spain Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine Long-Acting: Overview of Injection Guidance, Injection Site Reactions, and Best Practices for Intramuscular Injection Administration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1