WISDOM Project – XIX. Figures of merit for supermassive black hole mass measurements using molecular gas and/or megamaser kinematics

Hengyue Zhang, Martin Bureau, Mark D Smith, M. Cappellari, T. Davis, Pandora Dominiak, J. Elford, Fu-heng Liang, I. Ruffa, Thomas G Williams
{"title":"WISDOM Project – XIX. Figures of merit for supermassive black hole mass measurements using molecular gas and/or megamaser kinematics","authors":"Hengyue Zhang, Martin Bureau, Mark D Smith, M. Cappellari, T. Davis, Pandora Dominiak, J. Elford, Fu-heng Liang, I. Ruffa, Thomas G Williams","doi":"10.1093/mnras/stae1106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The mass (MBH) of a supermassive black hole (SMBH) can be measured using spatially-resolved kinematics of the region where the SMBH dominates gravitationally. The most reliable measurements are those that resolve the smallest physical scales around the SMBHs. We consider here three metrics to compare the physical scales probed by kinematic tracers dominated by rotation: the radius of the innermost detected kinematic tracer Rmin normalised by respectively the SMBH’s Schwarzschild radius (RSchw ≡ 2GMBH/c2, where G is the gravitational constant and c the speed of light), sphere-of-influence (SOI) radius ($R_\\mathrm{SOI}\\equiv GM_\\mathrm{BH}/\\sigma _\\mathrm{e}^2$, where σe is the stellar velocity dispersion within the galaxy’s effective radius) and equality radius (the radius Req at which the SMBH mass equals the enclosed stellar mass, MBH = M*(Req), where M*(R) is the stellar mass enclosed within the radius R). All metrics lead to analogous simple relations between Rmin and the highest circular velocity probed Vc. Adopting these metrics to compare the SMBH mass measurements using molecular gas kinematics to those using megamaser kinematics, we demonstrate that the best molecular gas measurements resolve material that is physically closer to the SMBHs in terms of RSchw but is slightly farther in terms of RSOI and Req. However, molecular gas observations of nearby galaxies using the most extended configurations of the Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array can resolve the SOI comparably well and thus enable SMBH mass measurements as precise as the best megamaser measurements.","PeriodicalId":506975,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","volume":"53 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mass (MBH) of a supermassive black hole (SMBH) can be measured using spatially-resolved kinematics of the region where the SMBH dominates gravitationally. The most reliable measurements are those that resolve the smallest physical scales around the SMBHs. We consider here three metrics to compare the physical scales probed by kinematic tracers dominated by rotation: the radius of the innermost detected kinematic tracer Rmin normalised by respectively the SMBH’s Schwarzschild radius (RSchw ≡ 2GMBH/c2, where G is the gravitational constant and c the speed of light), sphere-of-influence (SOI) radius ($R_\mathrm{SOI}\equiv GM_\mathrm{BH}/\sigma _\mathrm{e}^2$, where σe is the stellar velocity dispersion within the galaxy’s effective radius) and equality radius (the radius Req at which the SMBH mass equals the enclosed stellar mass, MBH = M*(Req), where M*(R) is the stellar mass enclosed within the radius R). All metrics lead to analogous simple relations between Rmin and the highest circular velocity probed Vc. Adopting these metrics to compare the SMBH mass measurements using molecular gas kinematics to those using megamaser kinematics, we demonstrate that the best molecular gas measurements resolve material that is physically closer to the SMBHs in terms of RSchw but is slightly farther in terms of RSOI and Req. However, molecular gas observations of nearby galaxies using the most extended configurations of the Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array can resolve the SOI comparably well and thus enable SMBH mass measurements as precise as the best megamaser measurements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WISDOM 项目 - XIX.利用分子气体和/或巨激光运动学测量超大质量黑洞质量的优越性数字
超大质量黑洞(SMBH)的质量(MBH)可以通过对 SMBH 引力主导区域的空间分辨运动学来测量。最可靠的测量是那些能分辨出 SMBH 周围最小物理尺度的测量。在这里,我们考虑用三个指标来比较以旋转为主的运动追踪器探测到的物理尺度:最内层探测到的运动示踪剂的半径Rmin,分别以SMBH的施瓦兹柴尔德半径(RSchw ≡ 2GMBH/c2,其中G是引力常数,c是光速)、影响球(SOI)半径($R_\mathrm{SOI}\equiv GM_\mathrm{BH}/\sigma _\mathrm{e}^2$、其中,σe 是星系有效半径内的恒星速度弥散)和相等半径(SMBH 质量等于所包围的恒星质量的半径 Req,MBH = M*(Req),其中 M*(R) 是半径 R 所包围的恒星质量)。所有指标都会导致 Rmin 与探测到的最高圆周速度 Vc 之间出现类似的简单关系。采用这些指标来比较使用分子气体运动学测量的 SMBH 质量和使用巨激光运动学测量的 SMBH 质量,我们发现最好的分子气体测量结果所解析的物质,在 RSchw 方面与 SMBH 的物理距离更近,但在 RSOI 和 Req 方面却稍远一些。然而,利用阿塔卡马大型毫米/亚毫米波阵列的最扩展配置对附近星系进行的分子气体观测,可以很好地分辨出 SOI,从而可以获得与最佳巨激光测量一样精确的 SMBH 质量测量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: TESS light curves of cataclysmic variables – III – More superhump systems among old novae and nova-like variables Sulphur storage in cold molecular clouds: the case of the NH4+SH- salt on interstellar dust grains Correction to: The role of environment and AGN feedback in quenching local galaxies: comparing cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to the SDSS Correction to: The environmental dependence of the stellar mass–gas metallicity relation in Horizon Run 5 Correction to: The variability patterns of the TeV blazar PG 1553 + 113 from a decade of MAGIC and multiband observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1