The effect of the different waves of COVID-19 pandemic on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers.

Ghanshyam Goyal, Sujoy Majumdar, Usashi Biswas Bose, Ms Rekha Shrivastava, J.J. Mukherjee, S. Banka, S. Kapoor, Edward Jude
{"title":"The effect of the different waves of COVID-19 pandemic on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers.","authors":"Ghanshyam Goyal, Sujoy Majumdar, Usashi Biswas Bose, Ms Rekha Shrivastava, J.J. Mukherjee, S. Banka, S. Kapoor, Edward Jude","doi":"10.1177/15347346241237284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nCOVID-19 pandemic has massively impacted human health. We studied the effect of COVID-19 on outcome of Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).\n\n\nOBJECTIVES AND METHODS\nWe recruited 483 people with DFUs from June 2020 to April 2022 (pandemic) together with a matched group of 226 people with DFU from March 2019 to March 2020 (pre-pandemic). Primary endpoint was outcome of ulcers-healed or amputation (major/minor). It was sub-analysed into 3 waves of COVID-19. Secondary endpoint was healing of individual types of DFUs. Basic anthropometric data included site and type of ulcer (ischemic or neuropathic), duration, presence or absence of infection and Wagner's grading of DFUs was collected for all patients. Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy was done by monofilament testing and peripheral arterial disease by handheld Doppler and ankle brachial index (ABI). Standardized treatment protocol was provided. All patients were monitored for 6 months.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn the pandemic group 323 (66.9%) patients in whom ulcers healed, 70 (14.5%) underwent minor amputation, 11 (2.2%) major amputation, 29 (6%) were lost to follow up, 22 (4.6%) were not healed. Rate of healing of DFU was higher (66.9% vs 53.5%) and rate of amputation was lower (16.7% vs 23.4%) in the pandemic group than in the pre-pandemic group (P = 0.001 and 0.037 respectively). Rate of healing in first, second and third wave was 65.4%, 75.2%, 58.3% respectively (P = 0.001). Neuropathic ulcers though less prevalent (49.8% vs 57.8%) in the first two waves than in the third wave, healing was better (79.3% vs 75.6%) in the first two waves than in the third wave (P = 0.085 and 0.488 respectively). Similarly, amputation rates in ischemic and neuro-ischemic ulcers were greater in the third wave than first two waves (46.7% vs 15.7%, P = 0.049).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, healing of neuropathic ulcers was better, especially in the first and second waves and travel restriction may have accounted for this. However, worsening of ischemic and neuro-ischemic ulcers was observed with more amputation in these two groups. Conversely, in the third wave withdrawal of lockdown led to worsening of DFUs resulting in less healing and more amputation.","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241237284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIMS COVID-19 pandemic has massively impacted human health. We studied the effect of COVID-19 on outcome of Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). OBJECTIVES AND METHODS We recruited 483 people with DFUs from June 2020 to April 2022 (pandemic) together with a matched group of 226 people with DFU from March 2019 to March 2020 (pre-pandemic). Primary endpoint was outcome of ulcers-healed or amputation (major/minor). It was sub-analysed into 3 waves of COVID-19. Secondary endpoint was healing of individual types of DFUs. Basic anthropometric data included site and type of ulcer (ischemic or neuropathic), duration, presence or absence of infection and Wagner's grading of DFUs was collected for all patients. Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy was done by monofilament testing and peripheral arterial disease by handheld Doppler and ankle brachial index (ABI). Standardized treatment protocol was provided. All patients were monitored for 6 months. RESULTS In the pandemic group 323 (66.9%) patients in whom ulcers healed, 70 (14.5%) underwent minor amputation, 11 (2.2%) major amputation, 29 (6%) were lost to follow up, 22 (4.6%) were not healed. Rate of healing of DFU was higher (66.9% vs 53.5%) and rate of amputation was lower (16.7% vs 23.4%) in the pandemic group than in the pre-pandemic group (P = 0.001 and 0.037 respectively). Rate of healing in first, second and third wave was 65.4%, 75.2%, 58.3% respectively (P = 0.001). Neuropathic ulcers though less prevalent (49.8% vs 57.8%) in the first two waves than in the third wave, healing was better (79.3% vs 75.6%) in the first two waves than in the third wave (P = 0.085 and 0.488 respectively). Similarly, amputation rates in ischemic and neuro-ischemic ulcers were greater in the third wave than first two waves (46.7% vs 15.7%, P = 0.049). CONCLUSION During the COVID-19 pandemic, healing of neuropathic ulcers was better, especially in the first and second waves and travel restriction may have accounted for this. However, worsening of ischemic and neuro-ischemic ulcers was observed with more amputation in these two groups. Conversely, in the third wave withdrawal of lockdown led to worsening of DFUs resulting in less healing and more amputation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同波次的 COVID-19 大流行对糖尿病足溃疡预后的影响。
目的COVID-19大流行对人类健康产生了巨大影响。我们在 2020 年 6 月至 2022 年 4 月(大流行)期间招募了 483 名糖尿病足溃疡患者,并在 2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月(大流行前)期间招募了 226 名糖尿病足溃疡患者。主要终点是溃疡愈合或截肢(大/小)的结果。该研究分为 COVID-19 的 3 个阶段。次要终点是各类型 DFU 的愈合情况。所有患者的基本人体测量数据包括溃疡部位和类型(缺血性或神经性)、持续时间、有无感染以及 DFU 的瓦格纳分级。通过单丝测试诊断周围神经病变,通过手持多普勒和踝肱指数(ABI)诊断周围动脉疾病。提供了标准化的治疗方案。结果 在大流行组中,溃疡愈合的患者有 323 人(66.9%),70 人(14.5%)进行了轻微截肢,11 人(2.2%)进行了大截肢,29 人(6%)失去随访,22 人(4.6%)未愈合。与大流行前相比,大流行组的 DFU 愈合率更高(66.9% 对 53.5%),截肢率更低(16.7% 对 23.4%)(P = 0.001 和 0.037)。第一、第二和第三波的愈合率分别为 65.4%、75.2% 和 58.3%(P = 0.001)。神经性溃疡虽然在前两波的发病率(49.8% 对 57.8%)低于第三波,但在前两波的愈合率(79.3% 对 75.6%)却高于第三波(P = 0.085 和 0.488)。同样,缺血性和神经缺血性溃疡的截肢率在第三波中也高于前两波(46.7% vs 15.7%,P = 0.049)。结论在 COVID-19 大流行期间,神经病理性溃疡的愈合情况较好,尤其是在第一波和第二波中,这可能与旅行限制有关。然而,在这两组中,缺血性和神经缺血性溃疡的愈合情况有所恶化,截肢人数增多。与此相反,在第三波治疗中,取消封锁导致 DFUs 恶化,导致愈合更差,截肢更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing. Analysis of Genetic Risk Factors Associated with Charcot Foot Based on the FinnGen Study R9 Data: A Wide-angle Mendelian Randomization Study. Manifestations of Endocrine Disease in the Lower Extremities: Beyond the Diabetic Foot. Evolving Strategies in the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers. Early Tissue Resection Versus Watchful Waiting After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1