Restrictions applied by WTO countries in international trade in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Małgorzata Fronczek
{"title":"Restrictions applied by WTO countries in international trade in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Małgorzata Fronczek","doi":"10.2478/ijme-2024-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The present article discusses changes in tariff and non-tariff restrictions applied in World Trade Organization (WTO) countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.\n \n \n \n The employed research tools were a review and analysis of literature along with source statistical data of WTO, UNCTAD, OECD, and ITC.\n \n \n \n During the pandemic, the average level of tariffs in the WTO countries did not change significantly. From 2019 to 2021, the standard level of duties amounted to less than 15% in more than 90% of the member states. In contrast, 2020 saw an unprecedented increase since 1995 in the number of new non-tariff measures introduced without prior notification. As a result, the restrictions applied as a whole covered the most significant part of world trade since 2009 (13.6%). The newly introduced restrictive measures affected trade worth US$68.8 billion in 2020, i.e., over half as much as in 2019 (US$46.2 billion).\n \n \n \n A noneconomic factor (pandemic) caused the WTO countries to introduce restrictions that were permitted but eluded normal procedures. This calls into question the effectiveness of liberalization measures within the WTO.\n","PeriodicalId":43388,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2024-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article discusses changes in tariff and non-tariff restrictions applied in World Trade Organization (WTO) countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The employed research tools were a review and analysis of literature along with source statistical data of WTO, UNCTAD, OECD, and ITC. During the pandemic, the average level of tariffs in the WTO countries did not change significantly. From 2019 to 2021, the standard level of duties amounted to less than 15% in more than 90% of the member states. In contrast, 2020 saw an unprecedented increase since 1995 in the number of new non-tariff measures introduced without prior notification. As a result, the restrictions applied as a whole covered the most significant part of world trade since 2009 (13.6%). The newly introduced restrictive measures affected trade worth US$68.8 billion in 2020, i.e., over half as much as in 2019 (US$46.2 billion). A noneconomic factor (pandemic) caused the WTO countries to introduce restrictions that were permitted but eluded normal procedures. This calls into question the effectiveness of liberalization measures within the WTO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世贸组织国家在 COVID-19 大流行病背景下对国际贸易实行的限制
本文讨论了世界贸易组织(WTO)国家在 COVID-19 大流行期间适用的关税和非关税限制的变化。 本文采用的研究工具是文献综述和分析以及世贸组织、联合国贸发会议、经合组织和国际贸易中心的源统计数据。 在大流行期间,世贸组织国家的平均关税水平没有显著变化。从 2019 年到 2021 年,90% 以上的成员国的标准关税水平低于 15%。与此相反,自 1995 年以来,2020 年在未事先通知的情况下推出的新非关税措施数量出现了前所未有的增长。因此,所实施的限制措施总体上覆盖了 2009 年以来世界贸易的最主要部分(13.6%)。新出台的限制性措施影响了 2020 年价值 688 亿美元的贸易,比 2019 年(462 亿美元)高出一半以上。 非经济因素(大流行病)导致世贸组织国家采取了允许但未通过正常程序的限制措施。这不禁让人质疑世贸组织内自由化措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Global value chains before and in times of the COVID-19 pandemic Public participation in rural areas supported by regional governments in the context of sustainable rural development: The case of Poland Determinants of the success of participatory budgets in Poland Restrictions applied by WTO countries in international trade in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic The “autumn effect” in the gold market—does it contradict the Adaptive Market Hypothesis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1