Performance Measurement: Machine Learning as a Complement to DEA for Continuous Efficiency Estimation

Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.11113/mjfas.v20n2.3310
Yousef Khoubrane, Noor Asiah Ramli, Siti Shaliza Mohd Khairi
{"title":"Performance Measurement: Machine Learning as a Complement to DEA for Continuous Efficiency Estimation","authors":"Yousef Khoubrane, Noor Asiah Ramli, Siti Shaliza Mohd Khairi","doi":"10.11113/mjfas.v20n2.3310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a well-established non-parametric technique for performance measurement to access the efficiency of Decision-Making Units (DMUs). However, its inability to predict the efficiency values of new DMUs without re-conducting the analysis on the entire dataset has led to the integration of Machine Learning (ML) in previous studies to address this limitation. Yet, such integration often lacks a thorough evaluation of ML's adaptability in replacing current DEA process. This paper presents the results of an empirical study that employed eight ML models, two DEA variants, and a dataset of S&P500 companies. The findings demonstrated ML’s  remarkable precision in predicting efficiency values derived from a single DEA run and comparable performance in predicting the efficiency of new DMUs, thus eliminating the need for repeated DEA. This discovery highlights ML’s robustness as a complementary tool for DEA in continuous efficiency estimation, rendering the practice of re-conducting DEA unnecessary. Notably, boosting models within the Ensemble Learning category consistently outperformed other models, highlighting their effectiveness in the context of DEA efficiency prediction. Particularly, CatBoost demonstrated its superiority as the top-performing model, followed by LightGBM in the second position in most cases. When extended to five enlarged datasets, it shows that the model exhibits superior R² values in the CRS scenario.   ","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"69 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v20n2.3310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a well-established non-parametric technique for performance measurement to access the efficiency of Decision-Making Units (DMUs). However, its inability to predict the efficiency values of new DMUs without re-conducting the analysis on the entire dataset has led to the integration of Machine Learning (ML) in previous studies to address this limitation. Yet, such integration often lacks a thorough evaluation of ML's adaptability in replacing current DEA process. This paper presents the results of an empirical study that employed eight ML models, two DEA variants, and a dataset of S&P500 companies. The findings demonstrated ML’s  remarkable precision in predicting efficiency values derived from a single DEA run and comparable performance in predicting the efficiency of new DMUs, thus eliminating the need for repeated DEA. This discovery highlights ML’s robustness as a complementary tool for DEA in continuous efficiency estimation, rendering the practice of re-conducting DEA unnecessary. Notably, boosting models within the Ensemble Learning category consistently outperformed other models, highlighting their effectiveness in the context of DEA efficiency prediction. Particularly, CatBoost demonstrated its superiority as the top-performing model, followed by LightGBM in the second position in most cases. When extended to five enlarged datasets, it shows that the model exhibits superior R² values in the CRS scenario.   
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
绩效衡量:机器学习作为持续效率估算 DEA 的补充
数据包络分析法(DEA)是一种成熟的非参数技术,用于衡量决策单位(DMU)的效率。然而,由于其无法在不对整个数据集重新进行分析的情况下预测新 DMU 的效率值,因此在以往的研究中引入了机器学习(ML)来解决这一局限性。然而,这种整合往往缺乏对 ML 在替代当前 DEA 过程中的适应性的全面评估。本文介绍了一项实证研究的结果,该研究采用了八个 ML 模型、两个 DEA 变体和一个 S&P500 公司数据集。研究结果表明,ML 在预测单次 DEA 运行得出的效率值方面具有极高的精确度,在预测新 DMU 的效率方面也有不相上下的表现,因此无需重复进行 DEA。这一发现凸显了 ML 在连续效率估计中作为 DEA 补充工具的稳健性,使重新进行 DEA 的做法变得没有必要。值得注意的是,"集合学习 "类别中的 "助推 "模型的表现始终优于其他模型,这凸显了它们在 DEA 效率预测方面的有效性。其中,CatBoost 模型表现尤为突出,成为表现最好的模型,LightGBM 在大多数情况下紧随其后,位居第二。当扩展到五个扩大的数据集时,结果表明该模型在 CRS 情景下表现出更优越的 R² 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1