Association between pro-inflammatory diet and abdominal pain: Cross-sectional and case-control study from UK biobank and NHANES 2017-2020.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae028
Laifu Li, Zhuang Yan, Yan Ran, Jiamiao Chen, Lianli Wang, Shiwei Lu, Yating Sun, Fangchen Ye, Fei Dai
{"title":"Association between pro-inflammatory diet and abdominal pain: Cross-sectional and case-control study from UK biobank and NHANES 2017-2020.","authors":"Laifu Li, Zhuang Yan, Yan Ran, Jiamiao Chen, Lianli Wang, Shiwei Lu, Yating Sun, Fangchen Ye, Fei Dai","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThere is a close association between diet and abdominal pain, however, relationship between inflammatory diet and characteristics of abdominal pain has not been characterized yet.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study analyzed baseline data from the UK Biobank, 3-item DHQ-Abdominal Pain Questionnaire (DHQ-3Q) which including abdominal pain in the past three months, severity of abdominal pain, and frequency of abdominal pain, and data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2017 to 2020. Energy-adjusted Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DII), constructed based on 26 or 27 nutrients, was analyzed using continuous or categorical methods. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses examined the association between E-DII and abdominal pain.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn UK Biobank, compared to participants in the lowest quintile of E-DII, the adjusted ORs for the highest quintile were 1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.24; p = 0.022), 1.05 (95% CI 1.00-1.09; p = 0.030), 1.26 (95% CI 1.17-1.36; p < 0.001), and 1.10 (95% CI 1.00-1.20; p = 0.044) for chronic abdominal pain, abdominal pain in the past three months, severity of abdominal pain, and frequency of abdominal pain, respectively. In NHANES, compared to participants in the lowest quintile of E-DII, the adjusted ORs for the highest quintile were 1.46 (95% CI 1.20-1.77; p < 0.001), 1.75 (95% CI 1.20-2.60; p = 0.005), 1.45 (95% CI 1.14-1.87; p = 0.003), and 1.18 (95% CI 0.82-1.72; p = 0.380) for abdominal pain in the past year, upper left abdominal pain, upper middle abdominal pain, and upper right abdominal pain. Additionally, there was a nonlinear correlation between E-DII score and DHQ-3Q (p nonlinear <0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nFollowing a pro-inflammatory diet is linked to a higher likelihood of experiencing abdominal pain, as well as increased severity and frequency of such pain. Therefore, further longitudinal studies are necessary to investigate this relationship.","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is a close association between diet and abdominal pain, however, relationship between inflammatory diet and characteristics of abdominal pain has not been characterized yet. METHODS This study analyzed baseline data from the UK Biobank, 3-item DHQ-Abdominal Pain Questionnaire (DHQ-3Q) which including abdominal pain in the past three months, severity of abdominal pain, and frequency of abdominal pain, and data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2017 to 2020. Energy-adjusted Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DII), constructed based on 26 or 27 nutrients, was analyzed using continuous or categorical methods. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses examined the association between E-DII and abdominal pain. RESULTS In UK Biobank, compared to participants in the lowest quintile of E-DII, the adjusted ORs for the highest quintile were 1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.24; p = 0.022), 1.05 (95% CI 1.00-1.09; p = 0.030), 1.26 (95% CI 1.17-1.36; p < 0.001), and 1.10 (95% CI 1.00-1.20; p = 0.044) for chronic abdominal pain, abdominal pain in the past three months, severity of abdominal pain, and frequency of abdominal pain, respectively. In NHANES, compared to participants in the lowest quintile of E-DII, the adjusted ORs for the highest quintile were 1.46 (95% CI 1.20-1.77; p < 0.001), 1.75 (95% CI 1.20-2.60; p = 0.005), 1.45 (95% CI 1.14-1.87; p = 0.003), and 1.18 (95% CI 0.82-1.72; p = 0.380) for abdominal pain in the past year, upper left abdominal pain, upper middle abdominal pain, and upper right abdominal pain. Additionally, there was a nonlinear correlation between E-DII score and DHQ-3Q (p nonlinear <0.001). CONCLUSION Following a pro-inflammatory diet is linked to a higher likelihood of experiencing abdominal pain, as well as increased severity and frequency of such pain. Therefore, further longitudinal studies are necessary to investigate this relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促炎性饮食与腹痛之间的关系:来自英国生物库和 NHANES 2017-2020 的横断面和病例对照研究。
背景这项研究分析了英国生物库的基线数据、3项DHQ-腹痛问卷(DHQ-3Q)(包括过去3个月的腹痛、腹痛严重程度和腹痛频率)以及2017年至2020年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据。根据26或27种营养素构建的能量调整膳食炎症指数(E-DII)采用连续或分类方法进行分析。结果在英国生物库中,与 E-DII 最低五分位数的参与者相比,最高五分位数的调整 OR 为 1.12(95% CI 1.02-1.24;P = 0.022)、1.05(95% CI 1.00-1.09;p = 0.030)、1.26(95% CI 1.17-1.36;p < 0.001)和 1.10(95% CI 1.00-1.20;p = 0.044),分别为慢性腹痛、过去三个月腹痛、腹痛严重程度和腹痛频率。在 NHANES 中,与 E-DII 最低五分位数的参与者相比,最高五分位数的调整 OR 分别为 1.46 (95% CI 1.20-1.77; p < 0.001)、1.75 (95% CI 1.20-2.60; p = 0.005)、1.45 (95% CI 1.14-1.87; p = 0.003),过去一年腹痛、左上腹痛、中上腹痛和右上腹痛的相关系数分别为 1.18 (95% CI 0.82-1.72; p = 0.380)。此外,E-DII 评分与 DHQ-3Q 之间存在非线性相关性(p 非线性 <0.001)。因此,有必要开展进一步的纵向研究来探讨这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
Case-Based Peer Teaching for Pain Medicine Fellows: A Curriculum for Diverse Residency Backgrounds Exploring new educational approaches in neuropathic pain: Assessing accuracy and consistency of AI responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: Clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Assessment of chronic pain and its association with functional capacity in patients with HTLV-1. Examination of a repaired medial meniscus: ultrasound's forte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1