Endoscopic Resection of Malignancies in the Upper GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Visceral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1159/000538040
Ulrike Denzer
{"title":"Endoscopic Resection of Malignancies in the Upper GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm","authors":"Ulrike Denzer","doi":"10.1159/000538040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Malignancies in the upper gastrointestinal tract are amenable to endoscopic resection at an early stage. Achieving a curative resection is the most stringent quality criterion, but post-resection risk assessment and aftercare are also part of a comprehensive quality program. Summary: Various factors influence the achievement of curative resection. These include endoscopic assessment prior to resection using chromoendoscopy and HD technology. If resectability is possible, it is particularly important to delineate the lateral resection margins as precisely as possible before resection. Furthermore, the correct choice of resection technique depending on the lesion must be taken into account. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the standard for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric carcinoma. In Western countries, it is becoming increasingly popular to treat Barrett’s neoplasia over 2 cm in size and/or with suspected submucosal infiltration with en bloc resection instead of piece meal resection. After resection, risk assessment based on the histopathological resection determines the patient's individual risk of lymph node metastases, particularly in the case of high-risk lesions. This is categorized according to the current literature. Key Messages: This review presents clinical algorithms for endoscopic resection of esophageal SCC, Barrett’s neoplasia, and gastric neoplasia. The algorithms include the pre-resection assessment of the lesion and the resection margins, the adequate resection technique for the respective lesion, as well as the post-resection risk assessment with an evidence-based recommendation for follow-up therapy and surveillance.","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visceral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malignancies in the upper gastrointestinal tract are amenable to endoscopic resection at an early stage. Achieving a curative resection is the most stringent quality criterion, but post-resection risk assessment and aftercare are also part of a comprehensive quality program. Summary: Various factors influence the achievement of curative resection. These include endoscopic assessment prior to resection using chromoendoscopy and HD technology. If resectability is possible, it is particularly important to delineate the lateral resection margins as precisely as possible before resection. Furthermore, the correct choice of resection technique depending on the lesion must be taken into account. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the standard for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric carcinoma. In Western countries, it is becoming increasingly popular to treat Barrett’s neoplasia over 2 cm in size and/or with suspected submucosal infiltration with en bloc resection instead of piece meal resection. After resection, risk assessment based on the histopathological resection determines the patient's individual risk of lymph node metastases, particularly in the case of high-risk lesions. This is categorized according to the current literature. Key Messages: This review presents clinical algorithms for endoscopic resection of esophageal SCC, Barrett’s neoplasia, and gastric neoplasia. The algorithms include the pre-resection assessment of the lesion and the resection margins, the adequate resection technique for the respective lesion, as well as the post-resection risk assessment with an evidence-based recommendation for follow-up therapy and surveillance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上消化道恶性肿瘤的内窥镜切除术:临床算法
背景:上消化道恶性肿瘤可在早期进行内窥镜切除。实现治愈性切除是最严格的质量标准,但切除术后风险评估和术后护理也是综合质量计划的一部分。摘要:影响实现根治性切除的因素有很多。其中包括在切除前使用色内镜和高清技术进行内镜评估。如果可以切除,那么在切除前尽可能精确地划定侧切除边缘尤为重要。此外,还必须根据病变情况正确选择切除技术。内镜下粘膜下剥离术是食管鳞状细胞癌和胃癌的标准术式。在西方国家,治疗超过 2 厘米和/或疑似粘膜下浸润的巴雷特瘤时,越来越多地采用整体切除术,而不是分块切除术。切除术后,根据组织病理学切除情况进行风险评估,以确定患者发生淋巴结转移的个体风险,尤其是在高风险病变的情况下。这将根据目前的文献进行分类。关键信息:本综述介绍了食管 SCC、Barrett 肿瘤和胃肿瘤内镜切除术的临床算法。这些算法包括对病变和切除边缘的切除前评估、针对相应病变的适当切除技术,以及切除后风险评估和基于证据的后续治疗和监测建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visceral Medicine
Visceral Medicine Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal is unique in its field as it covers the principles of both gastrointestinal medicine and surgery required for treating abdominal diseases. In each issue invited reviews provide a comprehensive overview of one selected topic. Thus, a sound background of the state of the art in clinical practice and research is provided. A panel of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, and pathology discusses different approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the topic covered in the respective issue. Original articles, case reports, and commentaries make for further interesting reading.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter in Patients Undergoing Abdominal and Thoracic Surgeries with Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Urinary Retention. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Still a Complex and Complicated Disease with Many Uncertainties and Challenges. The Role of Magnesium in Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Injury: A Systematic Review. Endoscopic Resection of Neoplasia in the Lower GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm. Endoscopy First: The Best Choice to Optimize Outcomes for Early Gastrointestinal Malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1