Mental health profiles of depressive symptoms and personal well-being among active-duty military families.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Family Process Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1111/famp.13003
Catherine Walker O'Neal, Justin A. Lavner, Todd M Jensen, Mallory Lucier‐Greer
{"title":"Mental health profiles of depressive symptoms and personal well-being among active-duty military families.","authors":"Catherine Walker O'Neal, Justin A. Lavner, Todd M Jensen, Mallory Lucier‐Greer","doi":"10.1111/famp.13003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although some research has examined the mental health of individual family members in military families, additional research is needed that considers mental health among multiple members of the family system simultaneously and that characterizes subsets of families with distinct patterns. Mental health patterns of depressive symptoms and well-being in and among families were identified using latent profile analysis with a community sample of 236 military families with a service member (SM) parent, civilian partner, and adolescent. Drawing from the Family Adjustment and Adaptation Response model, we examined several military-related family demands (e.g., relocations, deployments) and capabilities (e.g., family cohesion, social support outside the family) as correlates of the family profiles. Three profiles emerged: thriving families (62.3% of the sample where all three family members reported relatively low depressive symptoms and high personal well-being), families with a relatively distressed SM (24.2%), and families with a relatively distressed adolescent (13.5%). Overall, there were no differences between the groups of families regarding military-related demands, yet there were differences between the groups regarding their capabilities, namely family cohesion and social support. In general, families in the thriving profile tended to have higher family cohesion and social support as reported by multiple family members compared to the other two profiles. Findings can inform the development of family needs assessments and tailored interventions (and intervention points) based on family profiles and current capabilities.","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although some research has examined the mental health of individual family members in military families, additional research is needed that considers mental health among multiple members of the family system simultaneously and that characterizes subsets of families with distinct patterns. Mental health patterns of depressive symptoms and well-being in and among families were identified using latent profile analysis with a community sample of 236 military families with a service member (SM) parent, civilian partner, and adolescent. Drawing from the Family Adjustment and Adaptation Response model, we examined several military-related family demands (e.g., relocations, deployments) and capabilities (e.g., family cohesion, social support outside the family) as correlates of the family profiles. Three profiles emerged: thriving families (62.3% of the sample where all three family members reported relatively low depressive symptoms and high personal well-being), families with a relatively distressed SM (24.2%), and families with a relatively distressed adolescent (13.5%). Overall, there were no differences between the groups of families regarding military-related demands, yet there were differences between the groups regarding their capabilities, namely family cohesion and social support. In general, families in the thriving profile tended to have higher family cohesion and social support as reported by multiple family members compared to the other two profiles. Findings can inform the development of family needs assessments and tailored interventions (and intervention points) based on family profiles and current capabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现役军人家庭中抑郁症状和个人幸福感的心理健康概况。
尽管一些研究已经对军人家庭中单个家庭成员的心理健康进行了调查,但还需要更多的研究来同时考虑家庭系统中多个成员的心理健康,并对具有不同模式的家庭子集进行特征描述。通过对 236 个有军人(SM)父母、平民伴侣和青少年的军人家庭的社区样本进行潜在特征分析,确定了家庭内部和家庭之间抑郁症状和幸福感的心理健康模式。根据家庭调整和适应反应模型,我们研究了与军事有关的家庭需求(如搬迁、部署)和能力(如家庭凝聚力、家庭外的社会支持),将其作为家庭特征的相关因素。结果显示了三种家庭状况:欣欣向荣的家庭(占样本的 62.3%,其中所有三名家庭成员均表示抑郁症状相对较轻且个人幸福感较高)、有一名相对抑郁的 SM 的家庭(24.2%)以及有一名相对抑郁的青少年的家庭(13.5%)。总体而言,各组家庭在与军事相关的需求方面没有差异,但在能力方面,即家庭凝聚力和社会支持方面存在差异。一般来说,与其他两种情况相比,由多名家庭成员报告的茁壮成长型家庭往往具有更高的家庭凝聚力和社会支持。研究结果可为根据家庭概况和当前能力制定家庭需求评估和有针对性的干预措施(及干预点)提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
期刊最新文献
Informant discrepancy profiles of helicopter parenting and adult children's partner-controlling and partner-controlled behaviors. The Milan Approach today. Parental involvement in Mexican-origin adolescents' romantic relationships: An examination of parents' cultural orientations and parent-youth relationships. Relationship quality and educational attainment links to development of cardiometabolic morbidity and multimorbidity across middle adulthood. Prevalence and predictors of help-seeking steps in a nationally representative Dutch sample of romantic couples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1