Prevalence of postpartum depression and its predictors among nursing mothers in selected hospitals in Nsukka, Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK Mental Health and Social Inclusion Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1108/mhsi-12-2023-0138
C. Anosike, Rita Chinenye Osefo, Nnanyelugo Ogechukwu Isiogugu, Emmanuel Chijiekwu Nwachukwu, Ugonna Kyrian Agu, Jonathan Chimaobi Nwaji, Mario-Ephraim Afam Ogbu
{"title":"Prevalence of postpartum depression and its predictors among nursing mothers in selected hospitals in Nsukka, Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey","authors":"C. Anosike, Rita Chinenye Osefo, Nnanyelugo Ogechukwu Isiogugu, Emmanuel Chijiekwu Nwachukwu, Ugonna Kyrian Agu, Jonathan Chimaobi Nwaji, Mario-Ephraim Afam Ogbu","doi":"10.1108/mhsi-12-2023-0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to determine the prevalence and predictors of postpartum depression (PPD) among nursing mothers in Nsukka, Nigeria.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey among nursing mothers in three hospitals in Nsukka, Nigeria. Data was collected using a self-administered Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and sociodemographic form. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square test and binary logistic regression.\n\nFindings\nA total of 270 nursing mothers participated in this survey, giving a response rate of 94.4%. The prevalence of PPD among the study group was 20.0%. However, women who did not have complications during childbirth were about two times (AOR = 0.417, 95% CI = 0.204, 0.852, P = 0.016) less likely to develop symptoms of PPD than women who experienced birth complications. In addition, women who had poor relationships with their partners have approximately seven times (AOR = 6.994, 95% CI = 1.110, 44.059, P = 0.038) higher odds of developing PPD compared with those women who had excellent relationships with their partners.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe sample size was small, hence, might limit the generalizability of its findings beyond the study group. Health-care practitioners should provide appropriate interventions to women at a higher risk of developing PPD on the need to maintain a healthy and supportive relationship with their partners.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides unique insight into PPD among nursing mothers and its determinants from a different regional, socioeconomic, societal expectations, social support system, access to health care and cultural context.\n","PeriodicalId":44476,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-12-2023-0138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to determine the prevalence and predictors of postpartum depression (PPD) among nursing mothers in Nsukka, Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach This study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey among nursing mothers in three hospitals in Nsukka, Nigeria. Data was collected using a self-administered Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and sociodemographic form. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square test and binary logistic regression. Findings A total of 270 nursing mothers participated in this survey, giving a response rate of 94.4%. The prevalence of PPD among the study group was 20.0%. However, women who did not have complications during childbirth were about two times (AOR = 0.417, 95% CI = 0.204, 0.852, P = 0.016) less likely to develop symptoms of PPD than women who experienced birth complications. In addition, women who had poor relationships with their partners have approximately seven times (AOR = 6.994, 95% CI = 1.110, 44.059, P = 0.038) higher odds of developing PPD compared with those women who had excellent relationships with their partners. Research limitations/implications The sample size was small, hence, might limit the generalizability of its findings beyond the study group. Health-care practitioners should provide appropriate interventions to women at a higher risk of developing PPD on the need to maintain a healthy and supportive relationship with their partners. Originality/value This study provides unique insight into PPD among nursing mothers and its determinants from a different regional, socioeconomic, societal expectations, social support system, access to health care and cultural context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚恩苏卡选定医院中哺乳期母亲产后抑郁症的患病率及其预测因素:横断面调查
本研究旨在确定尼日利亚恩苏卡市哺乳期母亲产后抑郁症(PPD)的患病率和预测因素。设计/方法/方法本研究是一项描述性横断面调查,调查对象是尼日利亚恩苏卡市三家医院的哺乳期母亲。数据收集采用自编爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和社会人口学表格。调查结果显示,共有 270 名哺乳期母亲参与了此次调查,回复率为 94.4%。研究组中 PPD 的发病率为 20.0%。然而,与出现分娩并发症的妇女相比,分娩时未出现并发症的妇女出现 PPD 症状的几率要低约两倍(AOR = 0.417,95% CI = 0.204,0.852,P = 0.016)。此外,与伴侣关系不融洽的女性相比,与伴侣关系融洽的女性出现 PPD 的几率要高出约七倍(AOR = 6.994,95% CI = 1.110,44.059,P = 0.038)。医疗保健从业人员应向罹患 PPD 风险较高的妇女提供适当的干预措施,使其认识到与伴侣保持健康和相互支持的关系的必要性。原创性/价值本研究从不同的地区、社会经济、社会期望、社会支持系统、医疗保健和文化背景出发,对哺乳期母亲的 PPD 及其决定因素提供了独特的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Student perceptions of post-pandemic university learning: challenges and benefits Student perceptions of post-pandemic university learning: challenges and benefits Mental health and positive introversion: a positive autoethnographic case study of Mark Weeks Mental health and positive introversion: a positive autoethnographic case study of Mark Weeks “The urge to tell and its consequences”: women’s memoirs of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1