Credit card loss forecasting: Some lessons from COVID

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Forecasting Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1002/for.3137
Partha Sengupta, Christopher H. Wheeler
{"title":"Credit card loss forecasting: Some lessons from COVID","authors":"Partha Sengupta,&nbsp;Christopher H. Wheeler","doi":"10.1002/for.3137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Models developed by banks to forecast losses in their credit card portfolios have generally performed poorly during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in 2020, when large forecast errors were observed at many banks. In this study, we attempt to understand the source of this error and explore ways to improve model fit. We use account-level monthly performance data from the largest credit card banks in the U.S. between 2008 and 2018 to build models that mimic the typical model design employed by large banks to forecast credit card losses. We then fit these on data from 2019 to 2021. We find that COVID-period model errors can be reduced significantly through two simple modifications: (1) including measures of the macroeconomic environment beyond indicators of the labor market, which served as the primary macro drivers used in many pre-pandemic models and (2) adjusting macro drivers to capture persistent/sustained changes, as opposed to temporary volatility in these variables. These model improvements, we find, can be achieved without a significant reduction in model performance for the pre-COVID period, including the Great Recession. Moreover, in broadening the set of macro influences and capturing sustained changes, we believe models can be made more robust to future downturns, which may bear little resemblance to past recessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forecasting","volume":"43 7","pages":"2448-2477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.3137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Models developed by banks to forecast losses in their credit card portfolios have generally performed poorly during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in 2020, when large forecast errors were observed at many banks. In this study, we attempt to understand the source of this error and explore ways to improve model fit. We use account-level monthly performance data from the largest credit card banks in the U.S. between 2008 and 2018 to build models that mimic the typical model design employed by large banks to forecast credit card losses. We then fit these on data from 2019 to 2021. We find that COVID-period model errors can be reduced significantly through two simple modifications: (1) including measures of the macroeconomic environment beyond indicators of the labor market, which served as the primary macro drivers used in many pre-pandemic models and (2) adjusting macro drivers to capture persistent/sustained changes, as opposed to temporary volatility in these variables. These model improvements, we find, can be achieved without a significant reduction in model performance for the pre-COVID period, including the Great Recession. Moreover, in broadening the set of macro influences and capturing sustained changes, we believe models can be made more robust to future downturns, which may bear little resemblance to past recessions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信用卡损失预测:COVID 的一些经验教训
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,银行为预测其信用卡投资组合的损失而开发的模型普遍表现不佳,尤其是在 2020 年,许多银行都出现了较大的预测误差。在本研究中,我们试图了解这一误差的来源,并探索提高模型拟合度的方法。我们使用 2008 年至 2018 年期间美国最大信用卡银行的账户级月度业绩数据,建立了模仿大型银行预测信用卡损失所采用的典型模型设计的模型。然后,我们对 2019 年至 2021 年的数据进行了拟合。我们发现,通过两个简单的修改,COVID 期间的模型误差可以显著减少:(1)除了劳动力市场指标外,还包括宏观经济环境的衡量指标,这些指标是许多大流行前模型中使用的主要宏观驱动因素;(2)调整宏观驱动因素,以捕捉这些变量的持久/持续变化,而不是临时波动。我们发现,在实现这些模型改进的同时,COVID 前时期(包括大衰退时期)的模型性能并没有显著下降。此外,通过扩大宏观影响因素的范围并捕捉持续性变化,我们相信可以使模型在未来的经济衰退中更加稳健,因为未来的经济衰退可能与过去的经济衰退几乎没有相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forecasting is an international journal that publishes refereed papers on forecasting. It is multidisciplinary, welcoming papers dealing with any aspect of forecasting: theoretical, practical, computational and methodological. A broad interpretation of the topic is taken with approaches from various subject areas, such as statistics, economics, psychology, systems engineering and social sciences, all encouraged. Furthermore, the Journal welcomes a wide diversity of applications in such fields as business, government, technology and the environment. Of particular interest are papers dealing with modelling issues and the relationship of forecasting systems to decision-making processes.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Predictor Preselection for Mixed‐Frequency Dynamic Factor Models: A Simulation Study With an Empirical Application to GDP Nowcasting Deep Dive Into Churn Prediction in the Banking Sector: The Challenge of Hyperparameter Selection and Imbalanced Learning Demand Forecasting New Fashion Products: A Review Paper
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1