M. F. Grande-Ratti, María C Llamedo, Agustina B Pires, María V Giuffre, Brenda N Garrido, Agustina Saldarini, Pedro Touzas, Bernardo Martínez, Ignacio M Bluro
{"title":"[Gender perspective in the care experience and in the results of patients who consult for chest pain in an emergency department].","authors":"M. F. Grande-Ratti, María C Llamedo, Agustina B Pires, María V Giuffre, Brenda N Garrido, Agustina Saldarini, Pedro Touzas, Bernardo Martínez, Ignacio M Bluro","doi":"10.24875/ACM.23000212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nClinical practice guidelines suggest performing an electrocardiogram (EKG) in patients with chest pain within the first 10 minutes in the emergency department, warning about subdiagnosis in women. Possible differences based on sex were analyzed.\n\n\nMethod\nAn observational and retrospective study in an Emergency Department, with adult patients admitted to the Chest Pain Unit in 2021.\n\n\nResults\nThere were 1,469 patients, of whom 774 were men (52.7%). The men were younger (60 vs. 65 years), were less overweight (17.18 vs. 22.16%), and had more previous admissions to the Coronary Unit (12 vs. 7%), compared to women. No gender differences were observed in EKG performance (91 vs. 90%), EKG time (median 4.1 vs. 4.5 minutes), or delay in care attention (median 25 vs. 26 minutes). In terms of healthcare resources, men underwent more biomarkers: troponins (63 vs. 55%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.35; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.10-1.67) and creatine phosphokinase (24.8 vs. 19.1%), received more aspirin (6.7 vs. 3.1%), nitrates/nitrites (6 vs. 3%), and hospitalization (17.18 vs. 10.50%; OR: 1.76; 95%CI; 1.30-2.40). Of 206 hospitalized, 112 had a final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (54%), more men than women (81 vs. 31). There were no significant differences in revascularization time, medication schedule at discharge, hospital stay, or mortality.\n\n\nConclusions\nGender did not affect precordial pain care, diagnosis, and treatment times, highlighting the quality of hospital care.","PeriodicalId":93885,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.23000212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Clinical practice guidelines suggest performing an electrocardiogram (EKG) in patients with chest pain within the first 10 minutes in the emergency department, warning about subdiagnosis in women. Possible differences based on sex were analyzed.
Method
An observational and retrospective study in an Emergency Department, with adult patients admitted to the Chest Pain Unit in 2021.
Results
There were 1,469 patients, of whom 774 were men (52.7%). The men were younger (60 vs. 65 years), were less overweight (17.18 vs. 22.16%), and had more previous admissions to the Coronary Unit (12 vs. 7%), compared to women. No gender differences were observed in EKG performance (91 vs. 90%), EKG time (median 4.1 vs. 4.5 minutes), or delay in care attention (median 25 vs. 26 minutes). In terms of healthcare resources, men underwent more biomarkers: troponins (63 vs. 55%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.35; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.10-1.67) and creatine phosphokinase (24.8 vs. 19.1%), received more aspirin (6.7 vs. 3.1%), nitrates/nitrites (6 vs. 3%), and hospitalization (17.18 vs. 10.50%; OR: 1.76; 95%CI; 1.30-2.40). Of 206 hospitalized, 112 had a final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (54%), more men than women (81 vs. 31). There were no significant differences in revascularization time, medication schedule at discharge, hospital stay, or mortality.
Conclusions
Gender did not affect precordial pain care, diagnosis, and treatment times, highlighting the quality of hospital care.