A 3D glacier dynamics–line plume model to estimate the frontal ablation of Hansbreen, Svalbard

José M. Muñoz-Hermosilla, J. Otero, E. De Andrés, Kaian Shahateet, Francisco Navarro, Iván Pérez-Doña
{"title":"A 3D glacier dynamics–line plume model to estimate the frontal ablation of Hansbreen, Svalbard","authors":"José M. Muñoz-Hermosilla, J. Otero, E. De Andrés, Kaian Shahateet, Francisco Navarro, Iván Pérez-Doña","doi":"10.5194/tc-18-1911-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Frontal ablation is responsible for a large fraction of the mass loss from tidewater glaciers. The main contributors to frontal ablation are iceberg calving and submarine melting, with calving often being the largest. However, submarine melting, in addition to its direct contribution to mass loss, also promotes calving through the changes induced in the stress field at the glacier terminus, so both processes should be jointly analysed. Among the factors influencing submarine melting, the formation of a buoyant plume due to the emergence of fresh subglacial water at the glacier grounding line plays a key role. In this study we used Elmer/Ice to develop a 3D glacier dynamics model including calving and subglacial hydrology coupled with a line plume model to calculate the calving front position at every time step. We applied this model to the Hansbreen–Hansbukta glacier–fjord system in southern Spitsbergen, Svalbard, where a large set of data are available for both the glacier and the fjord from September 2008 to March 2011. We found that our 3D model reproduced the expected seasonal cycle of advance–retreat. Besides, the modelled front positions were in good agreement with the observed front positions at the central part of the calving front, with longitudinal differences, on average, below 15 m for the period from December 2009 to March 2011. But there were regions of the front, especially the eastern margin, that presented major differences.\n","PeriodicalId":509217,"journal":{"name":"The Cryosphere","volume":"28 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cryosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1911-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Frontal ablation is responsible for a large fraction of the mass loss from tidewater glaciers. The main contributors to frontal ablation are iceberg calving and submarine melting, with calving often being the largest. However, submarine melting, in addition to its direct contribution to mass loss, also promotes calving through the changes induced in the stress field at the glacier terminus, so both processes should be jointly analysed. Among the factors influencing submarine melting, the formation of a buoyant plume due to the emergence of fresh subglacial water at the glacier grounding line plays a key role. In this study we used Elmer/Ice to develop a 3D glacier dynamics model including calving and subglacial hydrology coupled with a line plume model to calculate the calving front position at every time step. We applied this model to the Hansbreen–Hansbukta glacier–fjord system in southern Spitsbergen, Svalbard, where a large set of data are available for both the glacier and the fjord from September 2008 to March 2011. We found that our 3D model reproduced the expected seasonal cycle of advance–retreat. Besides, the modelled front positions were in good agreement with the observed front positions at the central part of the calving front, with longitudinal differences, on average, below 15 m for the period from December 2009 to March 2011. But there were regions of the front, especially the eastern margin, that presented major differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算斯瓦尔巴群岛汉斯布林正面消融的三维冰川动力线羽流模型
摘要潮汐冰川的大部分质量损失都是锋面消融造成的。造成正面消融的主要因素是冰山崩塌和海底融化,而冰山崩塌往往是最大的因素。不过,海底融化除了直接造成质量损失外,还通过冰川末端应力场的变化促进了冰山崩塌,因此这两个过程应共同分析。在影响海底融化的因素中,冰川接地线处冰川下淡水的出现所形成的浮力羽流起着关键作用。在这项研究中,我们使用 Elmer/Ice 开发了一个三维冰川动力学模型,包括冰川融化和冰川下水文,并结合冰川线羽流模型计算每个时间步的冰川融化前沿位置。我们将该模型应用于斯瓦尔巴群岛斯匹次卑尔根岛南部的汉斯布林-汉斯布克塔冰川-峡湾系统,该冰川和峡湾在 2008 年 9 月至 2011 年 3 月期间都有大量数据。我们发现,我们的三维模型再现了预期的前进-后退季节周期。此外,在 2009 年 12 月至 2011 年 3 月期间,建模的前沿位置与观测到的冰川融化前沿中心部分的前沿位置十分吻合,纵向差异平均低于 15 米。但在前沿的某些区域,尤其是东部边缘,则存在较大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Snow redistribution in an intermediate-complexity snow hydrology modelling framework Spatial variation in the specific surface area of surface snow measured along the traverse route from the coast to Dome Fuji, Antarctica, during austral summer Reanalyzing the spatial representativeness of snow depth at automated monitoring stations using airborne lidar data Spectral induced polarization imaging to monitor seasonal and annual dynamics of frozen ground at a mountain permafrost site in the Italian Alps Characterization of in situ cosmogenic 14CO production, retention and loss in firn and shallow ice at Summit, Greenland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1