Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus

Brandon Oto, Robert Baeten, Leon Chen, Puja Dalal, Ria Dancel, Steven Fox, Carl William Lange, Cameron M. Baston, Paul Bornemann, Siddharth P. Dugar, Andrew Goldsmith, M. Herbst, James N. Kirkpatrick, Abhilash Koratala, Michael J Lanspa, Viveta Lobo, Jason Nomura, A. Pustavoitau, Mourad Senussi, Vincent L Sorrell, Frances Mae West, A. Sarwal
{"title":"Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus","authors":"Brandon Oto, Robert Baeten, Leon Chen, Puja Dalal, Ria Dancel, Steven Fox, Carl William Lange, Cameron M. Baston, Paul Bornemann, Siddharth P. Dugar, Andrew Goldsmith, M. Herbst, James N. Kirkpatrick, Abhilash Koratala, Michael J Lanspa, Viveta Lobo, Jason Nomura, A. Pustavoitau, Mourad Senussi, Vincent L Sorrell, Frances Mae West, A. Sarwal","doi":"10.24908/pocus.v9i1.17240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite the growing use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in contemporary medical practice and the existence of clinical guidelines addressing its specific applications, there remains a lack of standardization and agreement on optimal practices for several areas of POCUS use. The Society of Point of Care Ultrasound (SPOCUS) formed a working group in 2022 to establish a set of recommended best practices for POCUS, applicable to clinicians regardless of their training, specialty, resource setting, or scope of practice. Using a three-round modified Delphi process, a multi-disciplinary panel of 22 POCUS experts based in the United States reached consensus on 57 statements in domains including: (1) The definition and clinical role of POCUS; (2) Training pathways; (3) Credentialing; (4) Cleaning and maintenance of POCUS devices; (5) Consent and education; (6) Security, storage, and sharing of POCUS studies; (7) Uploading, archiving, and reviewing POCUS studies; and (8) Documenting POCUS studies. The consensus statements are provided here. While not intended to establish a standard of care or supersede more targeted guidelines, this document may serve as a useful baseline to guide clinicians, leaders, and systems considering initiation or enhancement of POCUS programs.","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"24 23","pages":"95 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v9i1.17240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Despite the growing use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in contemporary medical practice and the existence of clinical guidelines addressing its specific applications, there remains a lack of standardization and agreement on optimal practices for several areas of POCUS use. The Society of Point of Care Ultrasound (SPOCUS) formed a working group in 2022 to establish a set of recommended best practices for POCUS, applicable to clinicians regardless of their training, specialty, resource setting, or scope of practice. Using a three-round modified Delphi process, a multi-disciplinary panel of 22 POCUS experts based in the United States reached consensus on 57 statements in domains including: (1) The definition and clinical role of POCUS; (2) Training pathways; (3) Credentialing; (4) Cleaning and maintenance of POCUS devices; (5) Consent and education; (6) Security, storage, and sharing of POCUS studies; (7) Uploading, archiving, and reviewing POCUS studies; and (8) Documenting POCUS studies. The consensus statements are provided here. While not intended to establish a standard of care or supersede more targeted guidelines, this document may serve as a useful baseline to guide clinicians, leaders, and systems considering initiation or enhancement of POCUS programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗点超声最佳实践:跨学科专家共识
摘要 尽管护理点超声(POCUS)在当代医疗实践中的应用越来越广泛,而且针对其具体应用的临床指南也已出台,但在 POCUS 使用的几个领域中,仍然缺乏标准化和最佳实践的共识。医疗点超声学会(SPOCUS)于 2022 年成立了一个工作小组,旨在为 POCUS 建立一套推荐的最佳实践,适用于临床医生,无论他们接受过何种培训、从事何种专业、拥有何种资源或属于何种执业范围。由美国 22 位 POCUS 专家组成的多学科小组采用三轮改良德尔菲流程,就以下领域的 57 项声明达成共识:(1) POCUS 的定义和临床作用;(2) 培训途径;(3) 资格认证;(4) POCUS 设备的清洁和维护;(5) 同意和教育;(6) POCUS 研究的安全性、存储和共享;(7) POCUS 研究的上传、归档和审查;以及 (8) POCUS 研究的记录。此处提供了共识声明。本文件并非旨在建立护理标准或取代更有针对性的指南,但可作为一个有用的基准,为考虑启动或加强 POCUS 计划的临床医生、领导者和系统提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Application of Point of Care Ultrasound to Screen for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Narrative Review VExUS to Guide Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis: Exploring a Novel Dimension of Point of Care Ultrasound Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Return of the Living Dead Gut – A Case Report of Ischemic Colitis Identified on Point of Care Ultrasound Emergency Physician Performed Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Paracentesis: A Retrospective Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1