Zakładowe źródła prawa pracy a legalność sporu zbiorowego

Małgorzata Kurzynoga
{"title":"Zakładowe źródła prawa pracy a legalność sporu zbiorowego","authors":"Małgorzata Kurzynoga","doi":"10.4467/25444654spp.24.004.19479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues that where the subject matter of a collective dispute only partially falls within the limits of a legitimate collective dispute, the employer does not have an obligation to enter into negotiations. Taking a different position, that the employer is obliged to negotiate with respect to the elements of the claims that do constitute legitimate subject matter of a collective dispute, as the Supreme Court found in its judgment of 16/03/2022 (II PSKP 47/21), is contrary to the Act on the Resolution of Collective Disputes ,the principles of criminal liability, and the principle of voluntary bargaining recognized in international law. It also carries the risk for the employer that it will not be possible to hold trade union activists acting during such a collective dispute accountable in the future. In addition, the article discusses the possibility for the employer to submit a protective letter to the minister competent for labor matters in order to prevent the appointment of a mediator as a means of legal protection against the continuation of a collective dispute that goes beyond the legitimate subject area of the dispute.","PeriodicalId":515897,"journal":{"name":"Studia z zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654spp.24.004.19479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article argues that where the subject matter of a collective dispute only partially falls within the limits of a legitimate collective dispute, the employer does not have an obligation to enter into negotiations. Taking a different position, that the employer is obliged to negotiate with respect to the elements of the claims that do constitute legitimate subject matter of a collective dispute, as the Supreme Court found in its judgment of 16/03/2022 (II PSKP 47/21), is contrary to the Act on the Resolution of Collective Disputes ,the principles of criminal liability, and the principle of voluntary bargaining recognized in international law. It also carries the risk for the employer that it will not be possible to hold trade union activists acting during such a collective dispute accountable in the future. In addition, the article discusses the possibility for the employer to submit a protective letter to the minister competent for labor matters in order to prevent the appointment of a mediator as a means of legal protection against the continuation of a collective dispute that goes beyond the legitimate subject area of the dispute.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳动法的公司渊源和劳工行动的合法性
文章认为,如果集体争议的主题仅部分属于合法集体争议的范围,则雇主没有义务进行谈判。最高法院在其 2022 年 3 月 16 日的判决(II PSKP 47/21)中认定,雇主有义务就确实构成合法集体争议标的的索赔内容进行谈判,而采取另一种立场则违反了《集体争议解决法》、刑事责任原则以及国际法承认的自愿谈判原则。对雇主而言,这还会带来一种风险,即今后将无法追究在此类集体争议中行事的工会积极分子的责任。此外,文章还讨论了雇主向主管劳动事务的部长提交保护函的可能性,以阻止任命调解员,作为防止集体争议继续超出争议合法主题领域的法律保护手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rozwój nowoczesnych technologii w zatrudnieniu a konieczność wprowadzenia odrębnej instytucji prawnej, jaką jest prawo do bycia offline Polskie związki zawodowe w procesie zarządzania algorytmicznego w środowisku pracy Czy jesteśmy gotowi na sztuczną inteligencję w zatrudnieniu? Prawo kadry zarządzającej i kierowniczej do bycia offline na przykładzie orzeczenia kolumbijskiego trybunału konstytucyjnego Rola systemów eksperckich opartych na SI w interpretacji przepisów prawa pracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1