Non-Operative Versus Operative Treatment of Z-Type Comminuted Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: A Prospective Sub-Stratified Cohort Analysis

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1097/bot.0000000000002821
C. Sabatini, E. Edmonds, J. Nepple, Elizabeth S. Liotta, Katelyn Hergott, C. Perkins, P. Wilson, Ying Li, H. Ellis, Nirav K. Pandya, A. Pennock, David D. Spence, S. Willimon, D. Bae, M. Kocher, Michael T. Busch, David N. Williams, B. Heyworth
{"title":"Non-Operative Versus Operative Treatment of Z-Type Comminuted Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: A Prospective Sub-Stratified Cohort Analysis","authors":"C. Sabatini, E. Edmonds, J. Nepple, Elizabeth S. Liotta, Katelyn Hergott, C. Perkins, P. Wilson, Ying Li, H. Ellis, Nirav K. Pandya, A. Pennock, David D. Spence, S. Willimon, D. Bae, M. Kocher, Michael T. Busch, David N. Williams, B. Heyworth","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of non-operative and operative treatment of adolescents with comminuted ‘Z-type’ mid-shaft clavicle fractures.\n \n \n \n Design: Prospective observational cohort\n \n \n \n Eight tertiary-care pediatric centers\n \n \n \n Patients 10 to 18 years-old who were treated either operatively or non-operatively for a diaphyseal clavicle fracture between 2013 and 2017 were screened/enrolled at the time of injury. The current sub-cohort analysis was derived from a larger adolescent clavicle study population of 907 patients.\n \n \n \n Complications and validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROs):(ASES, QuickDASH, Marx Shoulder Activity Score, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and patient satisfaction score) were compared between operative and non-operative cohorts.\n \n \n \n Eighty-one patients (69 male (85.2%), 12 female; average age 15 years (11.1-18.7); 78 with sports participation (96.2%)), were followed through bony healing and return to sports, while 59 patients (73%) completed two-year follow-up with patient-reported outcomes (PROs), 26 of whom were treated non-operatively and 33 treated operatively. All demographic and fracture characteristics were similar (p>0.05) between the two-year follow-up cohorts except for fracture shortening, which was greater in the operative cohort (23 mm vs 29 mm, p=0.01). After controlling for this potential confounder through both regression and propensity matched sub-group analysis, non-operative versus operative cohorts showed no difference in rates of nonunion (0%), delayed union (0% vs. 2.3%, p=1.0), symptomatic malunion (2.7% vs 0%, p=0.4), refracture (2.7% vs 2.2%, p=1.0), unexpected subsequent surgery (5.4% vs. 11.4%, p=0.45), or clinically significant complications (5.4% vs. 16%, p=0.17). There were no differences in any PROs between cohorts, both before and after controlling for the difference in fracture shortening (all p-values >0.05).\n \n \n \n In this prospective comparison of complications and two-year PROs in adolescents with comminuted Z-type clavicle fractures, non-operative and operative treatment yielded similar outcomes.\n \n \n \n Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of non-operative and operative treatment of adolescents with comminuted ‘Z-type’ mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Design: Prospective observational cohort Eight tertiary-care pediatric centers Patients 10 to 18 years-old who were treated either operatively or non-operatively for a diaphyseal clavicle fracture between 2013 and 2017 were screened/enrolled at the time of injury. The current sub-cohort analysis was derived from a larger adolescent clavicle study population of 907 patients. Complications and validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROs):(ASES, QuickDASH, Marx Shoulder Activity Score, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and patient satisfaction score) were compared between operative and non-operative cohorts. Eighty-one patients (69 male (85.2%), 12 female; average age 15 years (11.1-18.7); 78 with sports participation (96.2%)), were followed through bony healing and return to sports, while 59 patients (73%) completed two-year follow-up with patient-reported outcomes (PROs), 26 of whom were treated non-operatively and 33 treated operatively. All demographic and fracture characteristics were similar (p>0.05) between the two-year follow-up cohorts except for fracture shortening, which was greater in the operative cohort (23 mm vs 29 mm, p=0.01). After controlling for this potential confounder through both regression and propensity matched sub-group analysis, non-operative versus operative cohorts showed no difference in rates of nonunion (0%), delayed union (0% vs. 2.3%, p=1.0), symptomatic malunion (2.7% vs 0%, p=0.4), refracture (2.7% vs 2.2%, p=1.0), unexpected subsequent surgery (5.4% vs. 11.4%, p=0.45), or clinically significant complications (5.4% vs. 16%, p=0.17). There were no differences in any PROs between cohorts, both before and after controlling for the difference in fracture shortening (all p-values >0.05). In this prospective comparison of complications and two-year PROs in adolescents with comminuted Z-type clavicle fractures, non-operative and operative treatment yielded similar outcomes. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年 Z 型粉碎性锁骨骨折的非手术治疗与手术治疗:前瞻性分层队列分析
目的:比较青少年锁骨中轴粉碎性 "Z型 "骨折非手术治疗和手术治疗的临床、影像学和患者报告结果。 设计:前瞻性观察队列 八家三级医疗儿科中心 2013年至2017年期间因锁骨骨骺骨折接受手术或非手术治疗的10至18岁患者在受伤时接受筛查/登记。目前的子队列分析来自于一个由 907 名患者组成的更大的青少年锁骨研究群体。 比较了手术组群和非手术组群的并发症和有效的患者报告结局指标(PROs):(ASES、QuickDASH、马克思肩部活动评分、EQ-5D、EQ-VAS和患者满意度评分)。 81名患者(69名男性(85.2%),12名女性;平均年龄15岁(11.1-18.7);78名参加过运动(96.2%))接受了骨愈合和恢复运动的随访,59名患者(73%)完成了为期两年的患者报告结果(PROs)随访,其中26名患者接受了非手术治疗,33名患者接受了手术治疗。两年随访期间,两组患者的所有人口统计学特征和骨折特征均相似(P>0.05),但骨折缩短率除外,手术治疗组的骨折缩短率更高(23 毫米对 29 毫米,P=0.01)。通过回归分析和倾向匹配亚组分析对这一潜在混杂因素进行控制后,非手术队列与手术队列在骨折不愈合率(0%)、延迟愈合率(0% vs. 2.3%,p=1.0)方面没有差异。2.3%,P=1.0)、症状性骨折(2.7% vs 0%,P=0.4)、再骨折(2.7% vs 2.2%,P=1.0)、意外后续手术(5.4% vs 11.4%,P=0.45)或临床重大并发症(5.4% vs 16%,P=0.17)的发生率均无差异。在控制骨折缩短差异之前和之后,两组患者的任何PRO指标均无差异(所有P值均大于0.05)。 在这项前瞻性的Z型锁骨粉碎性骨折青少年并发症和两年PROs比较中,非手术治疗和手术治疗的结果相似。 治疗等级为二级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Outpatient Upper Extremity Fracture Surgery Is Associated with Increased Post-operative Emergency Department Visits. Lower Extremity Trauma is Associated With an Increased Rate of New Mental Disorder Diagnosis and Suicide Attempt. The Dangers of Distracted Driving: A Substudy of Patient Perception Data From the DRIVSAFE Observational Study. Heritable Thrombophilia and Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism Despite Thromboprophylaxis After Pelvis or Acetabulum Fracture. Timing of radiographic healing for distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1