Forbes Magazine's America's Best Banks: Are they best for investors?

G. Filbeck, Dianna C. Preece, Xin Zhao
{"title":"Forbes Magazine's America's Best Banks: Are they best for investors?","authors":"G. Filbeck, Dianna C. Preece, Xin Zhao","doi":"10.1111/acfi.13259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates announcement effects and longer‐term performance associated with the Forbes' America's Best Banks survey release. Although the market reacted positively to the announcement, the overall event window effects were insignificant. Raw and risk‐adjusted returns are statistically insignificant over longer‐time horizons. Investors cannot just use the Best Banks list to earn positive announcement window returns. However, a direct relation exists between movement in survey rank and subsequent accounting profitability measures, suggesting investors may benefit from monitoring movements on the Best Banks list. We also find support for a size effect as smaller, matched sample banks have higher Jensen's alphas than the Forbes larger Best Banks.","PeriodicalId":335953,"journal":{"name":"Accounting & Finance","volume":"102 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates announcement effects and longer‐term performance associated with the Forbes' America's Best Banks survey release. Although the market reacted positively to the announcement, the overall event window effects were insignificant. Raw and risk‐adjusted returns are statistically insignificant over longer‐time horizons. Investors cannot just use the Best Banks list to earn positive announcement window returns. However, a direct relation exists between movement in survey rank and subsequent accounting profitability measures, suggesting investors may benefit from monitoring movements on the Best Banks list. We also find support for a size effect as smaller, matched sample banks have higher Jensen's alphas than the Forbes larger Best Banks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福布斯》杂志评选出的美国最佳银行:它们最适合投资者吗?
本文研究了与福布斯 "美国最佳银行 "调查发布相关的公告效应和长期表现。虽然市场对公告做出了积极反应,但整体事件窗口效应并不显著。在更长的时间跨度上,原始回报率和风险调整后回报率在统计上并不显著。投资者不能仅仅利用最佳银行榜单来赚取积极的公告窗口收益。然而,调查排名的变动与随后的会计盈利能力指标之间存在直接关系,这表明投资者可能会从监控最佳银行名单的变动中获益。我们还发现了规模效应的支持,因为规模较小的匹配样本银行比福布斯较大的最佳银行具有更高的詹森指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keju tradition and major litigation cases: The persistent impact of Confucian norm standard The effect of government‐guided funds on target industries in development zones – Evidence from China Philanthropic forms of corporate social responsibility practices in a multinational company: Colonial and post‐colonial perspectives Rent‐seeking or value‐creating? The impact of managerial autonomy from state‐built corporate pyramids on M&A performance Government procurement and zombie firms' productivity: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1