Intellectual Property as Business Loan Collateral: A Taxonomy of Institutional and Economic Determinants

David Heller, L. Leitzinger, Uwe Walz
{"title":"Intellectual Property as Business Loan Collateral: A Taxonomy of Institutional and Economic Determinants","authors":"David Heller, L. Leitzinger, Uwe Walz","doi":"10.1093/grurint/ikae043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As a promising strategy to secure debt financing, firms can use their intellectual property rights (IPR) as collateral. Despite an ongoing shift to a more technology-based economy, the collateralization of IPR is still trailing behind the use of more traditional asset classes. In this paper, we address the challenges and opportunities of using IPR as collateral from a legal and economic angle by also exploring the role of and consequences for IP law. We develop a new taxonomy, i.e., a classification of the key determinants of using IPR as collateral. The taxonomy defines two pillars that govern the use of IPR collateral that distinguish between institutional and economic determinants. The institutional determinants cover contract law, IPR registries, and banking regulations. The economic determinants constitute the influence of IPR characteristics on the trade-off between the economic costs and benefits of collateralizing IPR. We apply the derived taxonomy to the legal and economic status quo in several industrialized economies to identify potential impediments to IPR-backed debt financing. Taken together, our taxonomy can be viewed as providing guidance for future research in the fields of law and economics on IPR as loan collateral for businesses.","PeriodicalId":506623,"journal":{"name":"GRUR International","volume":"111 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GRUR International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikae043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a promising strategy to secure debt financing, firms can use their intellectual property rights (IPR) as collateral. Despite an ongoing shift to a more technology-based economy, the collateralization of IPR is still trailing behind the use of more traditional asset classes. In this paper, we address the challenges and opportunities of using IPR as collateral from a legal and economic angle by also exploring the role of and consequences for IP law. We develop a new taxonomy, i.e., a classification of the key determinants of using IPR as collateral. The taxonomy defines two pillars that govern the use of IPR collateral that distinguish between institutional and economic determinants. The institutional determinants cover contract law, IPR registries, and banking regulations. The economic determinants constitute the influence of IPR characteristics on the trade-off between the economic costs and benefits of collateralizing IPR. We apply the derived taxonomy to the legal and economic status quo in several industrialized economies to identify potential impediments to IPR-backed debt financing. Taken together, our taxonomy can be viewed as providing guidance for future research in the fields of law and economics on IPR as loan collateral for businesses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为商业贷款抵押品的知识产权:制度和经济决定因素分类法
作为一种有前途的债务融资战略,企业可以将其知识产权作为抵押品。尽管经济正在向更加以技术为基础的方向转变,但知识产权的抵押仍然落后于更传统的资产类别。在本文中,我们从法律和经济角度探讨了将知识产权作为抵押品的挑战和机遇,同时还探讨了知识产权法的作用和后果。我们制定了一种新的分类法,即对使用知识产权作为抵押品的关键决定因素进行分类。该分类法定义了使用知识产权抵押品的两大支柱,区分了制度决定因素和经济决定因素。制度决定因素包括合同法、知识产权注册机构和银行法规。经济决定因素包括知识产权特征对知识产权抵押的经济成本和收益之间权衡的影响。我们将得出的分类法应用于几个工业化经济体的法律和经济现状,以确定知识产权担保债务融资的潜在障碍。综合来看,我们的分类法可为法律和经济学领域未来关于知识产权作为企业贷款抵押品的研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liability for the Offence of Counterfeiting Famous Trade Marks Implications of Missing the Newly Introduced Deadline for Supplementary Protection Application Platform Law as EU Law Consequences of Asserting Rights Under a Patent Later Declared Invalid Admissibility of Advertising Puffery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1