Comparison of Clinical Profile and Current Status of the Treatment Nonadherent Persons with Mental Illness: A Study from a Rural Community Mental Health Center in India

Sudhir Babu Sriramalu, A. R. Elangovan, Mohan K. Isaac, J. R. Kalyanasundaram
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Profile and Current Status of the Treatment Nonadherent Persons with Mental Illness: A Study from a Rural Community Mental Health Center in India","authors":"Sudhir Babu Sriramalu, A. R. Elangovan, Mohan K. Isaac, J. R. Kalyanasundaram","doi":"10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_147_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Treatment nonadherence comprises a combination of individual, family, social, treatment center, and illness-related factors. In this context, the present study aims to compare the clinical profile and the current status of persons with mental illness who have discontinued their treatment at a rural community mental health center (RCMHC) in India.\n \n \n \n The persons who discontinued treatment with a diagnosis category of severe mental disorders (SMDs), common mental disorders (CMDs), and substance use disorders (SUDs) who sought treatment at RCMHC are the study population. The present study has followed a comparative research design that compares the clinical profiles of SMDs, CMDs, and SUDs. A survey method of sampling was adopted. A semi-structured interview schedule, clinical global impression (CGI), and errors in drug adherence schedule were used as measures in the study. A home visit approach, telephone contacts, and collateral information were followed to collect the data.\n \n \n \n Out of the 80 respondents, only 16 (20.0%) reported improvement, and the remaining 16 (20.0%) are receiving treatment from various facilities. The rest of the 48 (60.0%) subjects were not on treatment despite being ill. The number of respondents who did not take their medication even for a day was 10 (12.5%), and another 34 (42.5%) subjects completely stopped their medication within a month. CGI-improvement highlights that nearly 47 (58.7%) respondents had shown much and very much improvement while they were on treatment. The CGI-severity of illness rating scale revealed that 54 (67.5%), i.e., nearly 2/3 of the respondents, were currently in the mild-to-extreme mentally ill category.\n \n \n \n Comprehensive psychosocial and community-based approaches will enhance treatment adherence in mental illness.\n","PeriodicalId":55693,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":"10 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_147_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment nonadherence comprises a combination of individual, family, social, treatment center, and illness-related factors. In this context, the present study aims to compare the clinical profile and the current status of persons with mental illness who have discontinued their treatment at a rural community mental health center (RCMHC) in India. The persons who discontinued treatment with a diagnosis category of severe mental disorders (SMDs), common mental disorders (CMDs), and substance use disorders (SUDs) who sought treatment at RCMHC are the study population. The present study has followed a comparative research design that compares the clinical profiles of SMDs, CMDs, and SUDs. A survey method of sampling was adopted. A semi-structured interview schedule, clinical global impression (CGI), and errors in drug adherence schedule were used as measures in the study. A home visit approach, telephone contacts, and collateral information were followed to collect the data. Out of the 80 respondents, only 16 (20.0%) reported improvement, and the remaining 16 (20.0%) are receiving treatment from various facilities. The rest of the 48 (60.0%) subjects were not on treatment despite being ill. The number of respondents who did not take their medication even for a day was 10 (12.5%), and another 34 (42.5%) subjects completely stopped their medication within a month. CGI-improvement highlights that nearly 47 (58.7%) respondents had shown much and very much improvement while they were on treatment. The CGI-severity of illness rating scale revealed that 54 (67.5%), i.e., nearly 2/3 of the respondents, were currently in the mild-to-extreme mentally ill category. Comprehensive psychosocial and community-based approaches will enhance treatment adherence in mental illness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不坚持治疗的精神病患者的临床概况和现状比较:一项来自印度农村社区心理健康中心的研究
不坚持治疗是由个人、家庭、社会、治疗中心和疾病相关因素共同造成的。在此背景下,本研究旨在比较印度一家农村社区精神健康中心(RCMHC)中断治疗的精神病患者的临床概况和现状。 研究对象为在农村社区精神健康中心寻求治疗的、诊断为严重精神障碍(SMDs)、普通精神障碍(CMDs)和药物使用障碍(SUDs)的中断治疗者。本研究采用比较研究设计,对严重精神障碍、常见精神障碍和药物使用障碍的临床概况进行比较。研究采用了调查抽样法。研究采用了半结构化访谈表、临床总体印象(CGI)和服药误差表作为测量指标。通过家访、电话联系和旁证信息等方式收集数据。 在 80 名受访者中,只有 16 人(20.0%)表示病情有所好转,其余 16 人(20.0%)正在接受不同机构的治疗。其余 48 名受访者(60.0%)尽管患病,但并未接受治疗。有 10 名受访者(12.5%)甚至一天都没有服药,另有 34 名受访者(42.5%)在一个月内完全停药。CGI- Improvement 显示,近 47 名受访者(58.7%)在接受治疗期间病情有很大和非常大的改善。CGI-病情严重程度量表显示,54 名受访者(67.5%),即近三分之二的受访者目前属于轻度至极度精神病患者。 以社会心理和社区为基础的综合方法将提高精神病患者的治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
State Initiated Insurance Coverages for Outpatient Therapies to Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in India An Analytical Study on Depression among the Geriatric Population of Rural Field Practice Area of Private Medical College in Andhra Pradesh State Screening for Occupational Stress in Resident Doctors: A Preliminary Study Dementia in South Indian Cinema – A Film Review School Closures and the Impact on Screen Time and Behavior during the Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1